Jump to content

College Sports

Talk college sports here...


797 topics in this forum

    • 146 replies
    • 1,490 views
    • 109 replies
    • 4,324 views
    • 178 replies
    • 4,921 views
    • 5 replies
    • 263 views
    • 11 replies
    • 498 views
    • 37 replies
    • 773 views
    • 4 replies
    • 266 views
    • 78 replies
    • 1,359 views
    • 0 replies
    • 275 views
    • 24 replies
    • 625 views
  1. HOCKEY EAST 1 2 3 4 12

    • 388 replies
    • 20,155 views
    • 6 replies
    • 756 views
    • 4 replies
    • 314 views
    • 347 replies
    • 8,309 views
    • 3 replies
    • 693 views
    • 8 replies
    • 559 views
    • 184 replies
    • 4,457 views
    • 2 replies
    • 480 views
    • 0 replies
    • 372 views
    • 11 replies
    • 691 views
    • 2 replies
    • 495 views
  2. NCAA Uber-Woke

    • 7 replies
    • 875 views
    • 224 replies
    • 11,137 views
    • 2 replies
    • 456 views
    • 1 reply
    • 411 views
    • 14 replies
    • 492 views
    • 3 replies
    • 423 views
    • 37 replies
    • 1,269 views
  3. Greg Schiano

    • 27 replies
    • 1,017 views
    • 0 replies
    • 496 views
  4. Betting on NCAA hoops?

    • 0 replies
    • 463 views
    • 0 replies
    • 512 views
    • 6 replies
    • 851 views
    • 2 replies
    • 712 views
    • 6 replies
    • 912 views
  • Posts

    • 1. I believe you’re making the argument it’s not a good idea to make a value play on a tackle in a very strong tackle class because in a team is bad scenario having the tackle spot filled is less appealing than having the top ten pick to a GM candidate. I’ve asked multiple times if that means the Jets would be able to hire a meaningfully worse GM candidate, since the job will - as we agree - be a bad job anyway, and it really only matters if the job is less appealing if they’re going to be able to hire a significantly worse candidate for that reason. Nobody’s said yes to that one. That being the case, the GM appeal argument doesn’t really move the needle for me in terms of considering whether to be aggressive this year in adding a tackle in a strong class. I think you can argue against, and I get where you’re coming from with the idea, but again I think it’s a concern that functionally doesn’t really result in any difference for the team so it’s not something I’d weigh heavily. 2. You pulled that one out of thin air. I honestly have no clue how next year’s tackle class looks, but that was never part of the argument. I think the caliber of tackle who’s going to go in the 20’s this year would usually go in the teens, which I believe I said.
    • With the 46th pick, the Indianapolis Colts select T J Tampa, CB, Iowa St. @King P Giants is OTC @JustInFudge Jags is on deck..                         With the 46th pick the Indianapolis Colts select T J Tampa, CB, Iowa St. @King P is OTC  @JustInFudge is on deck        
  • Available Subscriptions

×
×
  • Create New...