• Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


dbatesman last won the day on December 21 2015

dbatesman had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

33,990 Very Popular

About dbatesman

  • Rank
    The GENIUS of Mac
  • Birthday

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

20,908 profile views
  1. I want to add something before people jump in to yap about pro-style offenses and arm talent and progressions and next year's QB class is so much better: please don't. I am completely done with "scouting" conversations in re: QB prospects. They're clearly just a big game of ookie cookie for draft nerds, and absolutely none of us, myself included, has even the slightest ******* idea what we're talking about. From now on, my criteria are as follows: 1. Did he start a bunch of games? 2. Did he complete a bunch of passes? If the answer to both is yes, just draft the guy. I'm done trying to suss out more than that from Youtube cutups and Mayock quotes.
  2. I don't see anything wrong with Watson.
  3. You keep saying things like this. If Maccagnan passes on a legit QB prospect at 6 because of Hackenberg, then he's dumber than even I thought.
  4. totes magotes
  5. lmao another "working class hero" hating on a guy just because he's successful
  6. This is the first time I can say this unironically: well done, Whofans
  7. WOw, had not thought it this way...SickJets, thank's
  8. Here's that website you like explaining why Sperm and Dom are right and you're a dissembling yutz: http://www.ganggreennation.com/2017/2/17/14634880/how-ryan-clady-really-cost-the-jets-a-fourth-round-pick
  9. Over the final four games of the season, he totalled 5 tackles, 4 passes defended and 1 interception, but he looked weak at the line and stiff when turning to cover. Coming out of college he was considered a poor athlete with marginal speed and we definitely saw that over the final weeks.
  10. He must not have read this phenomenal article from something called "Gang Green Nation," in which the author says Burris "looked very solid" and then provides no evidence whatsoever to back it up.
  11. Super excited for the response "But the past becomes the present, which becomes the future, so how can you even draw this distinction. QED"