Matt39 Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 Just said our offense couldn't compete with some D1 teams. Agree? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 Just said our offense couldn't compete with some D1 teams. Agree? Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GlennFoley Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 Just said our offense couldn't compete with some D1 teams. Agree? *Chuckles* I know for a fact USC's offense is better then ours.. Texas, Minnesota, Michigan, UCLA, Northwestern, Wisconsin, all are better as well.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 If Bollinger was on Southern Montana they would still take him out on passing downs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormshadow19 Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 Salisbury is an idiot. There's no way any college team can hang with any NFL team. The Jets look bad because they're going against NFL teams. If they were going against college teams, they'd dominate. Men against boys? That's one of the most ignorant things I've ever heard that moron say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 Most of the time I would agree but not in this case. This offense is the worst I think I have ever seen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GlennFoley Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 Salisbury is an idiot. There's no way any college team can hang with any NFL team. The Jets look bad because they're going against NFL teams. If they were going against college teams, they'd dominate. Men against boys? That's one of the most ignorant things I've ever heard that moron say. Give me a break... USC, Minnesota, Wisconisn, and even Northwestern's oline is BIGGER then ours. Im sure there are a bunch of other DIV 1 teams as well that have bigger olines then we do.. Brooks and Curtis, Coles, and JMAC all would be luck if they got any playing time @ USC.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smizzy Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 Wyoming would torch us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJ Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 Only a fool would bet on ANY college teams O against any team's D in the NFL. They would get dealt in a quick hurry. It's apples and pomegranates. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormshadow19 Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 Give me a break... USC, Minnesota, Wisconisn, and even Northwestern's oline is BIGGER then ours. Im sure there are a bunch of other DIV 1 teams as well that have bigger olines then we do.. Brooks and Curtis, Coles, and JMAC all would be luck if they got any playing time @ USC.. Wow... because we all know bigger means they're automatically better Minnesota? Wisconsin? Northwestern? Man, I knew that Jets fans were a bit off, but this is ridiculous. Nothing but a bunch of drama queens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gun Of Bavaria Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 You're going to dive into the Big 10 for offenses that could beat ours? Christ Foley, at least have a little brains and pick Big 12, ACC or something like that. Big 10 offenses suck donkey balls. Foley reading your posts are about as enjoyable as eating aluminum foil. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GlennFoley Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 Only a fool would bet on ANY college teams O against any team's D in the NFL. They would get dealt in a quick hurry. It's apples and pomegranates. You're telling me that USC's offense could not score more then 3 pts against a defense that was allowing 400+ yds to teams like the Saints and the Dolphins? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GlennFoley Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 Matt Leinart>>Brooks Bollinger Reggie Bush>>Curtis Martin Dwayne Jarrett+Steve Smith>>Coles+Justin McCairens USC TE- has to be better then Doug Jolley USC Oline>Kendall, Goodwin, Moore, Gragg, Jones I don't see the argument... We don't even have one legit NFL starter on this offense.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormshadow19 Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 Matt Leinart>>Brooks Bollinger Reggie Bush>>Curtis Martin Dwayne Jarrett+Steve Smith>>Coles+Justin McCairens USC TE- has to be better then Doug Jolley USC Oline>Kendall, Goodwin, Moore, Gragg, Jones I don't see the argument... We don't even have one legit NFL starter on this offense.. Everything you just said is totally wrong. In terms of potential? Yeah, Leinhert and Bush could be better. They're not right now. Well... ok, Matt's better than Brooks. But Brooks wasn't even the best QB on his college team, but that's besides the point. The USC offensive line would be eaten alive by the Jets front four. What don't you understand about the Men against Boys thing? USC would be lucky to score, let alone move the ball. And, to that point, the Jets aren't even the worst team in the NFL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJ Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 You're telling me that USC's offense could not score more then 3 pts against a defense that was allowing 400+ yds to teams like the Saints and the Dolphins? Here's a way to think of it - how many of USC's starting 22 are going to be starters in the NFL? Out of the best NCAA teams in history, how many of those guys on a specific team ever started in the pro's? We are a poor example of a starting 22 right now but the numbers don't lie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LionelRichie Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 Everything you just said is totally wrong. In terms of potential? Yeah, Leinhert and Bush could be better. They're not right now. Well... ok, Matt's better than Brooks. But Brooks wasn't even the best QB on his college team, but that's besides the point. The USC offensive line would be eaten alive by the Jets front four. What don't you understand about the Men against Boys thing? USC would be lucky to score, let alone move the ball. And, to that point, the Jets aren't even the worst team in the NFL. 99 times out of 100 i would agree with this statement. but this jets offense is terrible, it may not be as good as usc. for all of his idiotic posts foley does have a point - how much worse can USC possibly be than the jets. 3 points vs NE, 3 points vs. carolina, 0 vs. denver - having guys like bush, white, leinert gives usc a chance to score at least 3 points and probably more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.