This makes no sense to me, which is why it makes perfect sense the jets almost did it.
http://espn.go.com/b...rvin-not-coples
Think it's true? Or an exaggerated rumor
125 replies to this topic
#2
SenorGato
-
- Members
- 17,587 posts
Schottenhomer
Posted 29 April 2012 - 11:49 PM
Wouldnt be too surprising...produced in college...at 6'3" has good height...very strong workout numbers...moves well on tape...Still, who gives a sh*t? He's not a certified Ware-esque freak and he's got his own off the field (and on the field) issues.
If they wanted Irvin the gap between him and Coples couldn't have been large. OTOH, I don't mind ESPN/others crapping on Los Yets right now...they'll all be back on the wagon again soon enough...let them enjoy blowing the Pats for now since the Brady era is coming to an end sooner rather than later.
If they wanted Irvin the gap between him and Coples couldn't have been large. OTOH, I don't mind ESPN/others crapping on Los Yets right now...they'll all be back on the wagon again soon enough...let them enjoy blowing the Pats for now since the Brady era is coming to an end sooner rather than later.
We sick an' tired of-a your ism-skism game. Dyin' 'n' goin' to heaven in-a Jesus' name, Lord. We know when we understand:<br />
Almighty God is a living man. - Bob Marley "Get up Stand up"
#3
pointman
-
- Members
- 4,027 posts
sandwiches are good.
Posted 29 April 2012 - 11:57 PM
Cimini wrote it, so more like total bullsh*t made up by a moron.This makes no sense to me, which is why it makes perfect sense the jets almost did it.
http://espn.go.com/b...rvin-not-coples
Think it's true? Or an exaggerated rumor
#5
Irish Jet
-
- Members
- 22,781 posts
Clobberin' Time
- LocationCraggy Island
Posted 30 April 2012 - 12:02 AM
LOL at Cimini, what an utter ****.
Even if it is true, I can't see why we'd have taken him then, my guess is we still would have tried to trade down. At least with Coples you new he'd be off the board pretty soon.
Even if it is true, I can't see why we'd have taken him then, my guess is we still would have tried to trade down. At least with Coples you new he'd be off the board pretty soon.
Team Rex
#8
SenorGato
-
- Members
- 17,587 posts
Schottenhomer
Posted 30 April 2012 - 12:08 AM
Exactly what I thought when I saw this.
+1
Thought I remember him saying something along these lines...
We sick an' tired of-a your ism-skism game. Dyin' 'n' goin' to heaven in-a Jesus' name, Lord. We know when we understand:<br />
Almighty God is a living man. - Bob Marley "Get up Stand up"
#11
SenorGato
-
- Members
- 17,587 posts
Schottenhomer
Posted 30 April 2012 - 12:39 AM
14 sacks (including 16 in 2010). I guess he had -2 in 2011
Was waiting for this to get a mention. Cimini sucks at being a troll, but Jet fans appreciate mediocrity and pay attention to it.
We sick an' tired of-a your ism-skism game. Dyin' 'n' goin' to heaven in-a Jesus' name, Lord. We know when we understand:<br />
Almighty God is a living man. - Bob Marley "Get up Stand up"
#13
GREENBEAN
-
- Members
- 2,507 posts
I may or may not like things
Posted 30 April 2012 - 06:12 AM
Yes, that you are a total waste of life that has no business writing about the Jets.
Right? A picture is developing? We could have taken Ingram or upshaw or whoever we wanted to take. Only 15 players had been taken up to that point. What is this picture? That we secretly hate our draft pick? This is ridiculous NY media crap.
Now that the draft is over, I'm looking forward to taking a nice vacation from all of this until training camp. It will be so nice not to hear the NY beat writers trying to create stories when there aren't any in the offseason. Ugh.....
Why must the Jets make it possible for me to be ridiculed at work EVERY SINGLE YEAR??????
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
#14
Integrity28
-
- Members
- 25,185 posts
I love it when Idzik's plan comes together.
- Locationwrong guy in the wrong place at the wrong time
Posted 30 April 2012 - 06:13 AM
I'm surprised this article took this long to surface. I assumed he would have had it written before the draft, and just plug in any old name and hit "send".
"Idz a process."
#15
JayKwaz
-
- Members
- 536 posts
the original Jackass
- LocationRiverhead, NY
Posted 30 April 2012 - 06:26 AM
I am a big Bruce Irvin fan, I have talked about wanting him a few times in the draft forum. Taking him in the first is just crazy, second would have been high but I would have since to me he was a high third. I would have to thonk this is a seahawk source trying to confirm to everyone why they picked him where they did.
In Rex I trust
#17
Jets Voice of Reason
-
- Members
- 5,096 posts
Are you listening?
Posted 30 April 2012 - 06:45 AM
Writer with no sources. He pretty much proved that before the draft. I'll wait and see If a legit report comes out.
Remember that time a few months ago when I said I had blue balls, and you, well, you gave a brother a hand?
That would be it for me..
#20
BroadwayJoe12
-
- Members
- 4,821 posts
JN's Mookie Blaylock
Posted 30 April 2012 - 07:50 AM
This again. Yes, maybe they preferred Irvin over Coples, but with St. Louis absolutely primed for a trade up, if the Jets valued one that much higher over the other, moving up a few spots to get THE guy you want, it's not that much. You don't sit around, you go get him. It's not as if seattle traded up and grabbed him, they traded back and sat in front of us for a handful of picks.
I don't see why it matters that we had players rated above our draft pick, it happens every year and happened to every single team in this draft minus Indy and Washington. Why is this time so special?
I don't see why it matters that we had players rated above our draft pick, it happens every year and happened to every single team in this draft minus Indy and Washington. Why is this time so special?
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
