Jump to content

  •  

Photo
- - - - -

Green and White Scrimmage


  • Please log in to reply
284 replies to this topic

#261 dbatesman

dbatesman

    Epic Failgoat

  • Members
  • 5,586 posts

Posted 06 August 2012 - 10:42 AM

"Fully healthy" being the operative phrase. Gates is 32, and hasn't been able to stay on the field the last two years. Gonzalez is 36, hasn't had a YAC number over 3.2 since '06, and never once in his career posted the 5.0 YAC number Keller had last season. Gonzalez is a first ballot HoF'er, but there's not a GM in the league who takes him over Keller today.


This is utter lunacy. Keller is terrible and Gonzalez was one of the best TEs in football last season.

This is like having a cat with leukemia.


#262 slats

slats

    anti-guard

  • Moderators
  • 15,997 posts
  • LocationAcross the Universe

Posted 06 August 2012 - 10:45 AM

This is utter lunacy. Keller is terrible and Gonzalez was one of the best TEs in football last season.


Utter lunacy is calling Keller terrible. Gonzalez is on his last legs, and Keller's getting better.
back in my room
wish you were dead
you bawl like the baby
in Eraserhead

#263 dbatesman

dbatesman

    Epic Failgoat

  • Members
  • 5,586 posts

Posted 06 August 2012 - 10:49 AM

Utter lunacy is calling Keller terrible. Gonzalez is on his last legs, and Keller's getting better.


His last legs were still good enough to be 4th in DYAR and 10th in DVOA last season. Keller was 32nd in both, and he's actually getting marginally worse (31st/30th in 2009, 27th/29th in 2010). I don't have the PFF numbers but I'd bet they'll tell you the same story.

This is like having a cat with leukemia.


#264 Matt39

Matt39

    straight cash homie

  • Members
  • 15,817 posts

Posted 06 August 2012 - 10:51 AM

His last legs were still good enough to be 4th in DYAR and 10th in DVOA last season. Keller was 32nd in both, and he's actually getting marginally worse (31st/30th in 2009, 27th/29th in 2010). I don't have the PFF numbers but I'd bet they'll tell you the same story.


Holy crap...32?

I didnt even think he was that bad. Just figured average.

#265 dbatesman

dbatesman

    Epic Failgoat

  • Members
  • 5,586 posts

Posted 06 August 2012 - 10:55 AM

Holy crap...32?

I didnt even think he was that bad. Just figured average.


Me too. His catch rate is absolutely abysmal, which in all fairness is partially on Sanchez, but even removing that from the equation probably wouldn't be enough to push him out of the bottom 10.

This is like having a cat with leukemia.


#266 Jetsfan80

Jetsfan80

    Hall Of Famer

  • Members
  • 25,788 posts

Posted 06 August 2012 - 10:59 AM

Utter lunacy is calling Keller terrible. Gonzalez is on his last legs, and Keller's getting better.


I'll take Gonzalez on his last legs any day, and every GM in the league would agree with me.

sheesh, I'm a doosh.


#267 Damaged89

Damaged89

    shut it down.

  • Members
  • 1,861 posts

Posted 06 August 2012 - 11:05 AM

I think I like Fitzpatrick a little more than you do, and adding Mario Williams certainly puts the Bills in that contender realm. But any team that overpays the Jets trash (Brad Smith) and gets their ass beaten by them (Jets have won 7 of last 8) has to earn the trash-talking priveleges.



Fitzpatrick reminds me of Chad Pennington. I do think he's better than Sanchez but that doesn't mean much.

Williams is good but not 100 million dollars good.

#268 Jetsfan80

Jetsfan80

    Hall Of Famer

  • Members
  • 25,788 posts

Posted 06 August 2012 - 11:36 AM

Williams is good but not 100 million dollars good.


No non-QB is worth that kind of money.

sheesh, I'm a doosh.


#269 HDKostempski

HDKostempski

    Practice Squad Player

  • Members
  • 212 posts
  • LocationJamestown, NY

Posted 06 August 2012 - 12:04 PM

Bad teams dont go to the AFC Championship game 2 years in a row or havent had a losing season in 5 years.

You want to call the Jets average, or slightly above which is more accurate. I'll listen. But all credibility goes out the window when you call a team who competes for or makes the playoffs each year a "bad" team.

Bad teams are teams like the Rams, Dolphags, Browns or Bills. The Jets arent in that category no matter how hard you try.


It's what the team does in the current season that means something, not what it did the season before or the season before that or the season five years ago.

Both the Jets and Colts made the playoffs in 2009 and 2010. Fact.

Did that fact prevent the Colts from imploding in 2011?

Did that fact enable the Jets to make the playoffs in 2011?

The Colts are a crappy team. The Jets have the look of one that could just as crappy. Maybe they won't be, but don't bet more than you can afford to lose on it.

#270 dbatesman

dbatesman

    Epic Failgoat

  • Members
  • 5,586 posts

Posted 06 August 2012 - 12:07 PM

The Colts are a crappy team. The Jets have the look of one that could just as crappy.


I'm as big a pessimist as anyone, but get ahold of yourself, brochacho.

This is like having a cat with leukemia.


#271 JiF

JiF

    New Beginnings with Rex Ryan

  • Members
  • 31,173 posts
  • LocationSomewhere between Heaven and Hell

Posted 06 August 2012 - 12:22 PM

It's what the team does in the current season that means something, not what it did the season before or the season before that or the season five years ago.

Both the Jets and Colts made the playoffs in 2009 and 2010. Fact.

Did that fact prevent the Colts from imploding in 2011?

Did that fact enable the Jets to make the playoffs in 2011?

The Colts are a crappy team. The Jets have the look of one that could just as crappy. Maybe they won't be, but don't bet more than you can afford to lose on it.


All credibility, which was extremely little, is completely and utterly out the window. No matter what you post, from this point forward is going to result in the following response:

Derpity Derp Derp De-Derp

Congrats!
Posted Image

#272 T0mShane

T0mShane

    Of the ilk.

  • Members
  • 17,093 posts

Posted 06 August 2012 - 12:25 PM

Can we start talking about Friday's game? If the first team O doesn't average 4+ ypc, I might start panicking.
Well, that's the internet, man: 9 billion tough guys who secretly want to touch your pee-pee.

#273 dbatesman

dbatesman

    Epic Failgoat

  • Members
  • 5,586 posts

Posted 06 August 2012 - 12:32 PM

Can we start talking about Friday's game?



This is like having a cat with leukemia.


#274 afosomf

afosomf

    mon

  • Members
  • 21,667 posts

Posted 06 August 2012 - 01:07 PM

It's what the team does in the current season that means something, not what it did the season before or the season before that or the season five years ago.

Both the Jets and Colts made the playoffs in 2009 and 2010. Fact.

Did that fact prevent the Colts from imploding in 2011?

Did that fact enable the Jets to make the playoffs in 2011?

The Colts are a crappy team. The Jets have the look of one that could just as crappy. Maybe they won't be, but don't bet more than you can afford to lose on it.



the big difference between colts and jets is the chance the colts become great again is very high ,while jets navigate in muddy waters

#275 RutgersJetFan

RutgersJetFan

    Leisureforce

  • Members
  • 13,416 posts

Posted 06 August 2012 - 02:08 PM

His last legs were still good enough to be 4th in DYAR and 10th in DVOA last season. Keller was 32nd in both, and he's actually getting marginally worse (31st/30th in 2009, 27th/29th in 2010). I don't have the PFF numbers but I'd bet they'll tell you the same story.


Drop percentage has been pretty bad, but an interesting one that they recently tracked was Yards per Route Run and Keller was somewhere in the 16-20 range, (below guys like Daniels or Lewis). The thing I found interesting about that particular metric is that it was an interesting take on the correlation between conventional production and opportunities, and the list was pretty legit. Graham and Gronk were so far ahead of everyone it wasn't even funny, Evan Moore deserved more opportunities (which has been long known), ditto for Finley and Jared Cook.

With Keller, the stat basically inferred that he's not producing nearly what he should be when taking into account the opportunities he's been afforded over the past 3 seasons. While the formula was very basic, (yards/routes), the fact that FO's numbers wholly support some of the interpretations help make it a telling stat, (things like Fred Davis is probably pretty good, Heath Miller is probably overrated...etc).

The thing about Keller is he still produces yards, and from the TE position that's always going to be overvalued in today's league. He's going to get overpaid next offseason and it's not going to be by us. I thought we should have explored trading him before the draft, because the comp pick we're going to get for losing him (probably a 4th) isn't going to be as high as what we could have gotten by a some semi-desperate GM.

(Chandler)'s a nice piece as long as he's the 7th most important player on your roster....I think they're going to be disappointed when they see he's just a pumped-up Drew Gooden.


#276 slats

slats

    anti-guard

  • Moderators
  • 15,997 posts
  • LocationAcross the Universe

Posted 06 August 2012 - 03:20 PM

His last legs were still good enough to be 4th in DYAR and 10th in DVOA last season. Keller was 32nd in both, and he's actually getting marginally worse (31st/30th in 2009, 27th/29th in 2010). I don't have the PFF numbers but I'd bet they'll tell you the same story.


Meh, I don't know. They had to sample a lot of guys with a lot less production than Keller to rank higher in nerd numbers. Keller was 6th in the league in yards, 9th in yards/catch, and 9th in catches among NFL TEs. He's doing something right despite catches passing from Sanchez in Schottenheimer's offense.
back in my room
wish you were dead
you bawl like the baby
in Eraserhead

#277 RutgersJetFan

RutgersJetFan

    Leisureforce

  • Members
  • 13,416 posts

Posted 06 August 2012 - 03:28 PM

Meh, I don't know. They had to sample a lot of guys with a lot less production than Keller to rank higher in nerd numbers.


Those aren't sample sets.

(Chandler)'s a nice piece as long as he's the 7th most important player on your roster....I think they're going to be disappointed when they see he's just a pumped-up Drew Gooden.


#278 Vicious89x

Vicious89x

    Master Banned

  • Members
  • 16,883 posts

Posted 06 August 2012 - 03:52 PM

It's what the team does in the current season that means something, not what it did the season before or the season before that or the season five years ago.

Both the Jets and Colts made the playoffs in 2009 and 2010. Fact.

Did that fact prevent the Colts from imploding in 2011?

Did that fact enable the Jets to make the playoffs in 2011?

The Colts are a crappy team. The Jets have the look of one that could just as crappy. Maybe they won't be, but don't bet more than you can afford to lose on it.


If the jets lost Sanchez and Tebow our drop-off would not be as steep as losing Manning.

#279 RutgersJetFan

RutgersJetFan

    Leisureforce

  • Members
  • 13,416 posts

Posted 06 August 2012 - 03:56 PM

If the jets lost Sanchez and Tebow our drop-off would not be as steep as losing Manning.


Dare I say, it might even be an upgrade?

(Chandler)'s a nice piece as long as he's the 7th most important player on your roster....I think they're going to be disappointed when they see he's just a pumped-up Drew Gooden.


#280 HDKostempski

HDKostempski

    Practice Squad Player

  • Members
  • 212 posts
  • LocationJamestown, NY

Posted 06 August 2012 - 06:14 PM

Dare I say, it might even be an upgrade?


McElroy???




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users