Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

***Official 2013 Draft Thread***


47 posts in this topic

Posted · Report post

Yes....it's time

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Finally, I was calling for one after Miami but I guess we where 2-1

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited) · Report post

Finally, I was calling for one after Miami but I guess we where 2-1

defense = bad

offense = competing fo the worst in the nfl

so who do the jets pick with the top 5 pick they will probably have?

hopefully whoever it is mike tannenbaum isn't the one picking

Edited by neckdemon
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited) · Report post

Honestly the team is so bad you might as well start over. There's not one position outside of center I wouldnt take.

Take the BPA no matter what position.

Edited by New York Mick
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

ANYONE BUT A USC QB

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Geno Smith

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

i knew this thread wasn't premature.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

This thread is premature. Lol.

We don't know how the Jets are going to finish, or who's going to be doing the drafting when the time comes. I think they'll finish in the 7-9 range, and I hope that's not good enough for Tannenbaum to keep his job. If he does, I think you'll see some desperation from him. Not only will he defer salary cap pain but he'll draft specifically for need, and that's the absolute worst way to draft.

I'm with Mick on this one:

Honestly the team is so bad you might as well start over. There's not one position outside of center I wouldnt take.

Take the BPA no matter what position.

And not just this year, but every year.

When you draft for need instead of taking the Best Available Player, you are by definition taking a lesser player. Years of doing this creates a weaker team, and each year new needs develop because you've ignored better prospects to fill specific perceived needs.

This is where the Jets are right now. It has to come to an end. It won't if Tannenbaum keeps his job.

The Jets need a strong front office, that dictates to the head coach rather than drafting to his desires.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I really don't care what happens with the pick as long as it's not Mike Tannenbaum making it.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Im in favor of Drafting Tanny's walkin papers mon

BTW where are all the "in tanny we trust posters" they should show him some support mon, they have loved his draftpiks thruout the yrs Coples Hill......Revis Mangold

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited) · Report post

This thread is premature. Lol.

We don't know how the Jets are going to finish, or who's going to be doing the drafting when the time comes. I think they'll finish in the 7-9 range, and I hope that's not good enough for Tannenbaum to keep his job. If he does, I think you'll see some desperation from him. Not only will he defer salary cap pain but he'll draft specifically for need, and that's the absolute worst way to draft.

I'm with Mick on this one:

And not just this year, but every year.

When you draft for need instead of taking the Best Available Player, you are by definition taking a lesser player. Years of doing this creates a weaker team, and each year new needs develop because you've ignored better prospects to fill specific perceived needs.

This is where the Jets are right now. It has to come to an end. It won't if Tannenbaum keeps his job.

The Jets need a strong front office, that dictates to the head coach rather than drafting to his desires.

i dont necessarily agree with this. I say draft for need once you have a franchise QB. A all pro corner is only going to do so much for us as we see. We need the face of the franchise (a good one) for foreseeable future. Once we have that we take best players and build around the franchise QB.

Edited by jetsjetsjetss
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited) · Report post

ANYONE BUT A USC QB

Barkley's probably going to be available where were drafting. Are you excited now about what are fo could potentially do? Cause I'm not. Barkley sucks.

Edited by artemusclyde
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

QBs in this draft are meh. I'm sure if Rex and Tanny are here, we'll draft defense.

Needs are thus: QB, TE, WR, OG, OT, OLB, S

That all depends on what happens with our free agents and who gets cut.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

QBs in this draft are meh. I'm sure if Rex and Tanny are here, we'll draft defense.

Needs are thus: QB, TE, WR, OG, OT, OLB, S

That all depends on what happens with our free agents and who gets cut.

lord if we draft defense in the first round i'm gonna be pissed

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

lord if we draft defense in the first round i'm gonna be pissed

So if a blue chip stud is available at pick 5, but he is a defender, and by far the BAP you would rather reach for an offensive player, and pass on the Defensive stud, and if they don't you would be pissed?

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

lord if we draft defense in the first round i'm gonna be pissed

So if a blue chip stud is available at pick 5, but he is a defender, and by far the BAP you would rather reach for an offensive player, and pass on the Defensive stud, and if they don't you would be pissed?

yea i agree with lup. Our offense isnt doing anything without a better QB. Maybe if there is a megatron like WR we could take him but other then that id pass. Id like to see a linebacker if someone gets to us.

wonder what barkley is gonna have happen to him. He was like so friken good if we have 16 and he falls to us can we really pass? USC Qbs suck tho

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Barkley's probably going to be available where were drafting. Are you excited now about what are fo could potentially do? Cause I'm not. Barkley sucks.

If you have developed a healthy hate for Sanchez, Barkley will give you insight into what true hate feels like.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

i completely don't agree with the idea that our offense is sh*t so don't bother upgrading any of it unless we can get a qb first. and for lupz.....in that very very specific and totally unlikely scenario where there is a defensive player that is far and away the only player that should be considered because he is so freaking outstanding that no one else left on the board compares (strange how he would have fallen to us in this case, but for the sake of argument i'll play along) then we should trade back and pick up some more picks since we could use as many as we can get....and since this player is so ****ing great everyone will be dying to give us their picks to buy the chance to draft this guy.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Barkley's probably going to be available where were drafting. Are you excited now about what are fo could potentially do? Cause I'm not. Barkley sucks.

i would rather draft a 50 year old Charles barkey than draft a 23 year old Matt barkley

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

QBs in this draft are meh. I'm sure if Rex and Tanny are here, we'll draft defense.

Needs are thus: QB, TE, WR, OG, OT, OLB, S

That all depends on what happens with our free agents and who gets cut.

Hello Chad Henne.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Hello Chad Henne.

forhead vagina would be a significant upgrade over sanchez

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited) · Report post

So the QBs in the 2013 draft class isn´t the sh*t. And since we have a very expensive Sanchez for one more year (thanks Tanny), the smart thing might be to look in another direction. LB, OL, HB?

But if we a least cover the possible QBs, i think that Collin Klein and Geno Smith are two of the best ones thus far. And my question for you guys is what type of a QB should be the best fit in the Jets. A RG3 type (Klein) or the pocket passer Smith?

I haven´t seen enough of anyone of them as it is not an option for me to see any college games at all. So I am very much interested to get your feedback on the pros and cons for each player. Does Klein have the arm, accuracy, anitcipation etc? I know he can run.

I know for sure I don´t want Matt Barkley.

EDIT. Please take into consideration that Klein will cost us a lot less.

Edited by CM28
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Hello Chad Henne.

:face:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

continue to draft ACC players that formula seems to work well mon

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.