Only way we score points is if Cromartie is playing quarterback, running back, receiver, and blocks for himself.
Thursday Night Football Fins vs Bills
#21
Posted 16 November 2012 - 09:09 AM
#22
Posted 16 November 2012 - 09:20 AM
There's been a bunch.
Tampa was
Arizona was
Atlanta is
New Orleans was
Houston is
During the Dungy years, Tampa couldnt win in cold weather to save their lives. Their record was atrocious. That was the on going talk of their failures every time they stepped foot in cold weather. They had like an 0 for something record in games played in less than 50 degrees. They lost like 4 playoff games in a row in cold weather vs. teams like the Packers and Eagles. They finally broke that streak Gruden's first year. They were in fact, one of the worst all time cold weather teams.
When has Atlanta even been good enough to consider a good cold weather team? Go ahead and throw Arizona into the group as well. What big win in the cold have they ever had? New Orleans too. Every road playoff game they've played since Brees got there, they lost (Seattle, San Fran, Chicago). The year they won it all they had home field advantage.
So yeah, Houston's playing well in the cold. You got that one right.
Edited by JiF, 16 November 2012 - 10:24 AM.
#23
Posted 16 November 2012 - 10:18 AM
Back to the game last night, just saw a clip of Philbins press conference. At LEAST that guy is straight up about wtf is going on in his organization.. "We sucked" *to paraphrase*, he was more explicit...he didn't stand there with Tannehill's *numbers* and yuk him up.. He may start Moore soon..
Edited by Jetsouth, 16 November 2012 - 10:19 AM.
#24
Posted 16 November 2012 - 10:26 AM
Tampa did suck and for all intents and purposes (unless the Freeman thing is real) still will suck in cold weather, mostly because Tampa is more or less the second coming of the JETS, one SB and done... (for now) the Bucs suc and always will..
Back to the game last night, just saw a clip of Philbins press conference. At LEAST that guy is straight up about wtf is going on in his organization.. "We sucked" *to paraphrase*, he was more explicit...he didn't stand there with Tannehill's *numbers* and yuk him up.. He may start Moore soon..
Didnt see the presser but I just dont see that happening. You cant commit to a rookie and then yank him because of a few bad games. When you commit to him during the preseason, you're all in and willing to take the lumps that come with starting a rookie.
That would be a very foolish move.
#25
Posted 16 November 2012 - 10:30 AM
Just got a feeling.. Philbin is like a psycho history teacher or something that got pushed into coaching the football team. He yanked friggin RB for that fumble, just sayin.. He may want to try sitting Tannehill and see if Moore has anything to offer.Didnt see the presser but I just dont see that happening. You cant commit to a rookie and then yank him because of a few bad games. When you commit to him during the preseason, you're all in and willing to take the lumps that come with starting a rookie.
That would be a very foolish move.
I am not saying it is the right thing to do.. personally, I thought at least the rookie acted like he wanted to be there, and he actually made some decent throws in protect mode. I am saying Philbin is a psycho.
Edited by Jetsouth, 16 November 2012 - 10:32 AM.
#26
Posted 16 November 2012 - 10:38 AM
Just got a feeling.. Philbin is like a psycho history teacher or something that got pushed into coaching the football team. He yanked friggin RB for that fumble, just sayin.. He may want to try sitting Tannehill and see if Moore has anything to offer.
I am not saying it is the right thing to do.. personally, I thought at least the rookie acted like he wanted to be there, and he actually made some decent throws in protect mode. I am saying Philbin is a psycho.
Ha! I dont know enough about Philbin to make a prediction one way or the other, but I feel like if you're going to start a rookie, who had 1 season of starter experience in college that you are expecting rough patches of games and you're going to live with them...otherwise, why not start Moore from the jump?
#28
Posted 16 November 2012 - 10:51 AM
Can't recall without looking, but wasn't Moore injured..and that is more or less how Tannehill won the 1 spot ?
No. Garrard was injured.
Did you watch Hard Knocks? Philpin said Tannenhill won the starting job. Moore took it like a champ.
FWIW - I wouldnt mind getting Moore in the offseason.
#29
Posted 16 November 2012 - 11:07 AM
No..I didn't watch it, but I remember now.. still I wouldn't put it past this guy he doesn't really seem like he very tolerant of mistakes.No. Garrard was injured.
Did you watch Hard Knocks? Philpin said Tannenhill won the starting job. Moore took it like a champ.
FWIW - I wouldnt mind getting Moore in the offseason.
#30
Posted 16 November 2012 - 11:09 AM
No. Garrard was injured.
Did you watch Hard Knocks? Philpin said Tannenhill won the starting job. Moore took it like a champ.
FWIW - I wouldnt mind getting Moore in the offseason.
Matt Moore>Sanchez. At this point i would not mind picking him up as a FA either. He has torn us apart in the past.
#31
Posted 16 November 2012 - 12:59 PM
The year they won the superbowl they beat Chicago and Philly in dec and Jan, two cold ass places. A good team is a good team.
You guys act like a warm climate team has only guys from that city on it. Half the players on a team grow up in the cold and play college in the cold.
You're right. Tampa makes two teams.
It's very rare, you'll have to admit. When Arizona and San Diego come to Met Life in December, they won't play well.
Doesn't mean they won't win, but.....
BD
#32
Posted 16 November 2012 - 07:54 PM
You're right. Tampa makes two teams.
It's very rare, you'll have to admit. When Arizona and San Diego come to Met Life in December, they won't play well.
Doesn't mean they won't win, but.....
BD
Agreed after I looked into it more warm weather teams as a whole have done worse but over the last ten years the teams with the worst cold weather records are the jets, browns, skins and Bills. Of course this isn't a true measure cause they're just sh*tty teams and they play more games in the cold then warm weather teams.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













