Jump to content

  •  

Welcome to JetNation.com


Sign In  Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter

Create Account
Welcome to JetNation.com, your home for New York Jets talk. We are an independent site, which means we aren't affiliated with the NY Jets or SNY. The opinions here are never censored. We want you to join in on the conversation, but don't worry this is a simple and FREE process. Be apart of JetNation.com by signing in or creating an account. When you create an account, you can also opt to use your existing Facebook or Twitter login.
  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get email updates
  • Get your own profile page and make new friends
  • Send personal messages to other members.
Also be sure to check us out on Facebook and Twitter.
 
Guest Message by DevFuse

Photo
- - - - -

Anyone else rooting for a total implosion?


  • Please log in to reply
41 replies to this topic

#1 LionelRichie

LionelRichie

    Veteran

  • Members
  • 4,914 posts

Posted 16 November 2012 - 02:43 PM

The season is over. The only remaining question is just how ugly does this get and who the scapegoat for this debacle is?

The longer Rex stays with Sanchez and Sanchez keeps sucking the greater the theater. Almost impossible to excuse 8 consecutive quarters without an offensive TD - yet Rex swears that "Mark gives us the best chance to win". At some point he will have to give Tebow a shot. As soon as that happens the questions turn to Mark's future and his $8.5M guaranteed, which shines the spotlight on Tannenbaum's incompetence.

I really hope this gets ugly. It will at least be fun to watch.
  • 0

#2 Jetsfan80

Jetsfan80

    Hall Of Famer

  • Members
  • 46,742 posts

Posted 16 November 2012 - 02:45 PM

I know the rule as a fan is never to root for a tanking. But if its the best thing for the longterm future of the franchise, why is that the case?

Sure, maybe only a few GM's, coaches, and free agents are going want to come here if we go 5-11. But this organization needs change from the top down, and the only way to purge ourselves of Mike Tannenbaum and the culture that's been created here is to start over. Finishing with less than 7 wins will probably do the trick, and get us a top 10 pick to boot.

Having said that, when Sunday rolls around, I'll still find myself watching and, at least outwardly, rooting hard to beat Schottenheimer and the Rams. Too much pride on a gameday to do anything else.

Edited by Jetsfan80, 16 November 2012 - 02:49 PM.

  • 0

sheesh, I'm a doosh.


#3 Bugg

Bugg

    Of counsel whack job

  • Members
  • 14,894 posts

Posted 16 November 2012 - 02:46 PM

I would never do so. Even under Kotite.

Until now. It's clear if the Jets somehwo put any lipstick on this pig, Woody will try to bring back the same cast of goons.

Lose out in embarrassing fashion. Blow it all up.
  • 0
Objective-Glendale, Arizona

Super Bowl 49-February, 2015

#4 THE ILK

THE ILK

    almost banned yo

  • Banned
  • 18,971 posts
  • LocationThe Hall of Doom

Posted 16 November 2012 - 02:48 PM

If thats what it takes to get rid of everybody, then yes.
  • 0

Posted Image


#5 Blackout

Blackout

    Circle Of Bosses

  • Members
  • 33,134 posts
  • Locationhome

Posted 16 November 2012 - 02:54 PM

If thats what it takes to get rid of everybody, then yes.

you want a 0 player roster???
  • 0
Blackout, on 16 Oct 2014 - 10:28 PM, said: i HATE saying this but CJ2k is now CJ 0.5K at this point

#6 afosomf

afosomf

    mon

  • Members
  • 21,668 posts

Posted 16 November 2012 - 02:57 PM

I would never do so. Even under Kotite.

Until now. It's clear if the Jets somehwo put any lipstick on this pig, Woody will try to bring back the same cast of goons.

Lose out in embarrassing fashion. Blow it all up.


But bugg these are meaningful games in November, as a fan you should be happy mon
  • 0

#7 THE ILK

THE ILK

    almost banned yo

  • Banned
  • 18,971 posts
  • LocationThe Hall of Doom

Posted 16 November 2012 - 02:57 PM

you want a 0 player roster???


I could live with 0 players from this roster.
  • 0

Posted Image


#8 Integrity28

Integrity28

    Told you so.

  • Members
  • 34,324 posts
  • Locationwrong guy in the wrong place at the wrong time

Posted 16 November 2012 - 03:15 PM

I could live with 0 players from this roster.


Mangold is the only player on this team I'd argue on behalf of.

I firmly believe that the best CB in football does nothing but tie up money that should be spent on the other 23 starting positions. No team with the best CB in football wins the SB, however, the team with the best QBs in football seem to have a huge advantage.
  • 2

"Idz a process."

 

Posted Image


#9 THE ILK

THE ILK

    almost banned yo

  • Banned
  • 18,971 posts
  • LocationThe Hall of Doom

Posted 16 November 2012 - 03:20 PM

Mangold is the only player on this team I'd argue on behalf of.

I firmly believe that the best CB in football does nothing but tie up money that should be spent on the other 23 starting positions. No team with the best CB in football wins the SB, however, the team with the best QBs in football seem to have a huge advantage.


Losing Mangold would suck, but worth it, if it meant everybody else was gone too.
  • 0

Posted Image


#10 kay_gee

kay_gee

    full time Jets fan, part time troll

  • Writers \ Bloggers
  • 2,541 posts
  • Locationlive from New York

Posted 16 November 2012 - 03:20 PM

you want a 0 player roster???


I'd guess that with a 0 player roster, we'd average more points.
  • 0

#11 peebag

peebag

    What? Me Worry?

  • Members
  • 1,425 posts

Posted 16 November 2012 - 03:50 PM

I root for the Jets no matter what....it's a sickness I guess....
  • 0

#12 whodeawhodat

whodeawhodat

    2nd Year Veteran

  • Members
  • 1,415 posts
  • LocationI was up above it, now I'm down in it.

Posted 16 November 2012 - 03:53 PM

no, not yet. Give me a couple of weeks and I may be there. I really would like them to fire Luigi. Pitching shutouts as the OC should get your sh*t pushed in...
  • 0

#13 Stonehands

Stonehands

    Jet Fan

  • Members
  • 2,959 posts

Posted 16 November 2012 - 03:56 PM

I could live with 0 players from this roster.


Not even Nick Folk?
  • 0

#14 Smashmouth

Smashmouth

    Make us proud Wrecks

  • Members
  • 13,326 posts
  • LocationDallas Tx.

Posted 16 November 2012 - 04:02 PM

yes
  • 0

Proud Member of the AVM


#15 slowmoe57

slowmoe57

    Keep Smiling

  • Members
  • 5,806 posts
  • LocationAurora Illinois

Posted 16 November 2012 - 04:04 PM

Root for my team to lose the last 7 games to draft an unproven rookie or make trades that probably won't work anyway? PASS
Same Question -- too see personel changes -- maybe

Edited by slowmoe57, 16 November 2012 - 04:07 PM.

  • 0
Posted Image
Remember weed will get you through times of no money
better than money will get you through times of no weed
TFFFB

#16 flgreen

flgreen

    3rd Year Veteran

  • Members
  • 17,184 posts

Posted 16 November 2012 - 04:08 PM

If this were last year's draft, with Luck and RG III at the top of the draft I'd be all in. This draft has the weakest top end in recent memory, no point
  • 1

#17 afosomf

afosomf

    mon

  • Members
  • 21,668 posts

Posted 16 November 2012 - 04:12 PM

Root for my team to lose the last 7 games to draft an unproven rookie or make trades that probably won't work anyway? PASS
Same Question -- too see personel changes -- maybe


i suggest you listen to tanny interview on WFAn with Lumpy, u may change your mind to Yes Yes Yes
  • 0

#18 PatriotReign37

PatriotReign37

    500 warning points and counting.

  • Members
  • 9,975 posts
  • LocationThe road to Seacacus

Posted 16 November 2012 - 04:15 PM

Mangold is the only player on this team I'd argue on behalf of.

I firmly believe that the best CB in football does nothing but tie up money that should be spent on the other 23 starting positions. No team with the best CB in football wins the SB, however, the team with the best QBs in football seem to have a huge advantage.


A great QB and the right HC can do miracles.

Revis is a great CB and I would love him on the Pats, but not for the amount of money he wants. The whole team would suffer just to pay him. The highest paid player should be the QB.
  • 0

#19 slowmoe57

slowmoe57

    Keep Smiling

  • Members
  • 5,806 posts
  • LocationAurora Illinois

Posted 16 November 2012 - 04:16 PM

i suggest you listen to tanny interview on WFAn with Lumpy, u may change your mind to Yes Yes Yes

Ha at work now someone post it here I will listen -- promise
As fed up as I am I could never root for them to lose.
  • 0
Posted Image
Remember weed will get you through times of no money
better than money will get you through times of no weed
TFFFB

#20 PatriotReign37

PatriotReign37

    500 warning points and counting.

  • Members
  • 9,975 posts
  • LocationThe road to Seacacus

Posted 16 November 2012 - 04:18 PM

If this were last year's draft, with Luck and RG III at the top of the draft I'd be all in. This draft has the weakest top end in recent memory, no point


There always seems to be a QB that is a hidden gem in each draft.

Russell Wilson went in the 3rd round.
  • 0

#21 BroadwayJoe12

BroadwayJoe12

    JN's Rust Cohle

  • Members
  • 8,656 posts

Posted 16 November 2012 - 04:51 PM

Mangold is the only player on this team I'd argue on behalf of.

I firmly believe that the best CB in football does nothing but tie up money that should be spent on the other 23 starting positions. No team with the best CB in football wins the SB, however, the team with the best QBs in football seem to have a huge advantage.


It's clear pretty much everyone should be made available, but I don't see how you can present an argument to save mangold and not revis. The center is arguably the one position on the line that gets the least return on it's investment; there is the least drop from the elite centers to the league average. That's completely not the case for CB. If someone blows us away for revis, I think you have to listen, but there's no compensation that will be able to mask his loss, considering Wilson has been such a fail. If we hit on Wilson and kept Cro, then I think you can trade Revis, but at this point signing him to a long term deal is probably better than losing him for a 3rd round compensatory pick.
  • 0

#22 HessStation

HessStation

    FightThePower

  • Members
  • 24,063 posts

Posted 16 November 2012 - 05:07 PM

Mangold is the only player on this team I'd argue on behalf of.

I firmly believe that the best CB in football does nothing but tie up money that should be spent on the other 23 starting positions. No team with the best CB in football wins the SB, however, the team with the best QBs in football seem to have a huge advantage.

agreed on Mangold being the only player I'd care about.
  • 0

#23 Gastineau Lives

Gastineau Lives

    JetNation Radio Has Been

  • Members
  • 4,062 posts

Posted 16 November 2012 - 05:08 PM

For the first time in thirty years, yes. Absolutely. I hate this team personally.
  • 0
"Those eight weeks I spent as co-host of JetNation Radio were among the happiest of my life. Oh, and F Tom Shane."

#24 neckdemon

neckdemon

    Franchise Player

  • Members
  • 7,995 posts
  • LocationNJ

Posted 16 November 2012 - 05:25 PM

But bugg these are meaningful games in November, as a fan you should be happy mon


did you become a rastafarian recently?
  • 1

#25 flgreen

flgreen

    3rd Year Veteran

  • Members
  • 17,184 posts

Posted 16 November 2012 - 08:50 PM

There always seems to be a QB that is a hidden gem in each draft.

Russell Wilson went in the 3rd round.


So what's the point of tanking if the likes of the great Wilson can be had in the 3rd?
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users