Proposed Trade: Sanchez for Romo
#23
Posted 23 November 2012 - 01:14 PM
Are y suggesting Romi is awesome??
Yes, that's exactly what I meant. I don't know why I just didn't phrase it that way. I wasn't saying he was awesome relative to Sanchez, absolutely not, I meant he is awesome like Peyton Manning is awesome.
Edited by Gastineau Lives, 23 November 2012 - 01:15 PM.
#25
Posted 23 November 2012 - 01:41 PM
Yes, that's exactly what I meant. I don't know why I just didn't phrase it that way. I wasn't saying he was awesome relative to Sanchez, absolutely not, I meant he is awesome like Peyton Manning is awesome.
If you put Romo on the current Jet team, with the same offensive coaching and personnel, Romo would suck just as bad as Sanchez, he is horrendous, just as horrendous as Sanchez is.
He has far better personnel around him, and a better offensive system, but make no mistake, he matches Shanchezs suckage, suck for suck
#27
Posted 23 November 2012 - 01:45 PM
If you put Romo on the current Jet team, with the same offensive coaching and personnel, Romo would suck just as bad as Sanchez, he is horrendous, just as horrendous as Sanchez is.
He has far better personnel around him, and a better offensive system, but make no mistake, he matches Shanchezs suckage, suck for suck
We already kind of see what Romo would like like paired with Rex's defense. Except Dallas has a great pass rusher, and at this point a better secondary.
Long story short, if the defense gives up 4 scores - the QB is going to make a mess playing catchup. Romo and Sanchez are the same type of player.
Also this trade would never happen, so who cares.
"Idz a process."

#31
Posted 23 November 2012 - 03:17 PM
Id obviously take him over Sanchez however.
Edited by Matt39, 23 November 2012 - 03:18 PM.
#37
Posted 23 November 2012 - 05:46 PM
Cause why would you want to throw it to a top 5 TE of all time?Romo is really good at putting up garbage time numbers. When the game is actually close, he's just throwing the ball to Witten for no reason and making other dumb decisions.
Id obviously take him over Sanchez however.
#39
Posted 23 November 2012 - 06:24 PM
Possibly. But time seems to be about up for both of these guys in their respective cities, so......
I think the difference is that Romo would get to be a starter somewhere else: Arizona, St Louis, Jacksonville, maybe Tennessee or maybe even the Jets. Sanchez would be a backup if he went anywhere else.
If you put Romo on the current Jet team, with the same offensive coaching and personnel, Romo would suck just as bad as Sanchez, he is horrendous, just as horrendous as Sanchez is.
He has far better personnel around him, and a better offensive system, but make no mistake, he matches Shanchezs suckage, suck for suck
I totally disagree.
Even when the Jets had much better personnel on offense than they do now, Sanchez's play was, at best, mediocre. You can't even argue that part of that was because he was a rookie because a lot of rookies have put up far better numbers than Sanchez ever has: Matt Ryan, Joe Flacco, Andy Dalton, Andrew Luck, RG III, and Russell Wilson all looked or are looking much more competent as rookie starters than Sanchez did -- and better than Sanchez looks now.
A part of Romo's problems this year stem from the Cowgirls' lack of a decent OL and a plague of injuries to their RBs. There's absolutely NO doubt that Romo can read defenses, find the open receiver, and lead his team. Sanchez hasn't demonstrated any of that; his "successes" have come when throwing against prevent defenses or against totally crappy passing Ds like the Bills and NE (until the Pats retooled their D recently).
Romo's a gunslinger, and he thinks he can make every pass, so he tries to force the ball into tight windows. That's a big weakness, but it stems from his drive to win. Sanchez, OTOH, frequently throws INTs because he throws late because he simply doesn't see and process what he sees fast enough and accurately enough to make the throws at the right time.
Romo at his worst is still a much better QB than Sanchez has been or will be.
We already kind of see what Romo would like like paired with Rex's defense. Except Dallas has a great pass rusher, and at this point a better secondary.
Long story short, if the defense gives up 4 scores - the QB is going to make a mess playing catchup. Romo and Sanchez are the same type of player.
Also this trade would never happen, so who cares.
Again, I disagree. They are NOT "the same type of player" at all. See above. Romo has most of the intangibles you want in a QB as well as good physicals. Sanchez is lacking just about all of the intangibles that successful QBs need, and he may NOT be as good physically as Romo.
#40
Posted 23 November 2012 - 09:46 PM
If you put Romo on the current Jet team, with the same offensive coaching and personnel, Romo would suck just as bad as Sanchez, he is horrendous, just as horrendous as Sanchez is.
He has far better personnel around him, and a better offensive system, but make no mistake, he matches Shanchezs suckage, suck for suck
No. Romo has at least some semblance of pocket presence, ability to escape, improvise, better accuracy, better down the field, a better arm, throw in the face of pressure, not fumble every third time he gets sacked, ability to move his team down the field without a SEMBLANCE of a running game AND the ability to not run into his right guards a$$hole, fall flat on his back and fumble. Add to that the ability to not be a whiny, mopey little bitch and I would have to say he's much better than Sanchez.
Edited by Gastineau Lives, 23 November 2012 - 09:49 PM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
















