Tim Tebow ruined the JETS
#7
Posted 02 December 2012 - 04:09 PM
If there was no Tebow, Rex makes a move benching Sanchez sooner and the Jets make the play with McElroy. Tebow locked in Sanchez.
All today did was drop the Jets down the draft order list, Greg Mac might be smart enough to not turn it over, and that makes beating the likes of Arizona, Jax, Tenn, pretty much a given, but he will make guys pine for the Chad Pennington days when the Jets need to throw to win against the likes of NE, Denver, and such, he doesn't have the arm to win a shoot out unfortunately, it's a shame to because I do like him as a leader, and his knowledge, and smarts on when to do what with the ball.
#11
Posted 02 December 2012 - 06:03 PM
All today did was drop the Jets down the draft order list, Greg Mac might be smart enough to not turn it over, and that makes beating the likes of Arizona, Jax, Tenn, pretty much a given, but he will make guys pine for the Chad Pennington days when the Jets need to throw to win against the likes of NE, Denver, and such, he doesn't have the arm to win a shoot out unfortunately, it's a shame to because I do like him as a leader, and his knowledge, and smarts on when to do what with the ball.
That will literally never happen.
The truth is the skillset he has is the perfect skillset for a backup QB and it's very unlikely the Jets ever make him their "franchise" guy. At this point you let him finish out the season to see how he really does, but go into the offseason with the understanding that the Jets still need to be looking for a new long-term solution at QB.
Excuses are the tools of the incompetent.
#13
Posted 02 December 2012 - 06:37 PM
Rex ruined the Jets, not Tebow. It doesn't matter who is on the roster, the coach is supposed to back the guys that give him the best chance of winning. Rex is the only human who didn't see a change was necessary.
He was forced to use Tebow as the #2...thus making Sanchez the best option.

#14
Posted 02 December 2012 - 08:57 PM
That will literally never happen.
The truth is the skillset he has is the perfect skillset for a backup QB and it's very unlikely the Jets ever make him their "franchise" guy. At this point you let him finish out the season to see how he really does, but go into the offseason with the understanding that the Jets still need to be looking for a new long-term solution at QB.
The problem is Greg Mac will win some of these easy games because he won't turn the ball over, and we will finish 8-8, and pick around 15-20 in the draft, you let Sanchez finish the year we prob lose today, and a few more, and finish 6-10 at best with a much better pick, and that's just the start, an 8-8 finish might actually save some people's jobs around here, and that would suck.
#19
Posted 02 December 2012 - 11:20 PM
PSL's are a good investment.
Luol Deng is more efficient than Carmelo Anthony.
(Chandler)'s a nice piece as long as he's the 7th most important player on your roster....I think they're going to be disappointed when they see he's just a pumped-up Drew Gooden.
#20
Posted 03 December 2012 - 02:21 AM
I don't know if being in a shootout with NE or Denver is the best way to beat teams like that, you have to stop them with your defense. If you want to beat NE, play defense and protect the ball. I don't remember too many shootouts where NE lost, the Chargers beat them in a shootout years ago, and the Colts in the playoffs, but that was more of a comeback, I'm sure there more but my point is that it doesn't happen often and that isn't the way you beat those kind of teams.All today did was drop the Jets down the draft order list, Greg Mac might be smart enough to not turn it over, and that makes beating the likes of Arizona, Jax, Tenn, pretty much a given, but he will make guys pine for the Chad Pennington days when the Jets need to throw to win against the likes of NE, Denver, and such, he doesn't have the arm to win a shoot out unfortunately, it's a shame to because I do like him as a leader, and his knowledge, and smarts on when to do what with the ball.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


















