Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
FiremanEd42

Andrew Luck vs Mark Sanchez

Recommended Posts

FiremanEd42    12

Not saying that Sanchez is better than Luck, but talk about overrated.

Luck has a 55% completion percentage and 28 turnovers yet is considered an MVP candidate by ESPN

Hes actually on pace to have 34 turnovers by himself--Its amazing how this Colts team is 9-4.

  • Downvote 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Registered members do not see this ad. Click here to create your free account today.
Registered members do not see this ad. Click here to create your free account today.
slats    96,058

Id also be willing to say that 2011 Sanchez was statisitcly better than 2012 Luck

I'm not sure how much longer we'll be willing to listen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
FiremanEd42    12

Lets also not discount the head to head matchup between the two--Sanchez 35-Luck 9

I'd take Luck over Sanchez moving forward, but I dont think there is that big of a gap between the two

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Vicious89x    121,412

Lets also not discount the head to head matchup between the two--Sanchez 35-Luck 9

I'd take Luck over Sanchez moving forward, but I dont think there is that big of a gap between the two

The gap is closing?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jetsjetsjetss    110

Lets also not discount the head to head matchup between the two--Sanchez 35-Luck 9

I'd take Luck over Sanchez moving forward, but I dont think there is that big of a gap between the two

even if this was true

a rookie qb

vs a 4 year starter?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Pac    26,340

Lets also not discount the head to head matchup between the two--Sanchez 35-Luck 9

I'd take Luck over Sanchez moving forward, but I dont think there is that big of a gap between the two

Little advice..

when riling up the natives make sure you believe what you're saying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
JiF    125,351

Lets also not discount the head to head matchup between the two--Sanchez 35-Luck 9

I'd take Luck over Sanchez moving forward, but I dont think there is that big of a gap between the two

Luck is taller, thats about the only difference I see.

Good thread.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
JiF    125,351

And RG3 is just a little faster

That and R3 has a much darker complexion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Pac    26,340

Go ahead, tell him about dem statz.

I don't do good with facts and figurin'. can't wrap my head around all those #'s and words. sensory overload.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Pac    26,340

Kirk Cousins is already better than Sanchez.

Little advice..

when riling up the natives make sure you believe what you're saying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
T0mShane    90,849

Little advice..

when riling up the natives make sure you believe what you're saying.

I can't believe you typed out HTML tags to make that joke.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
JiF    125,351

What are you trying to say.

That RG3 has a darker complexion than Mark Sanchez.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Crusher    188,864

Not saying that Sanchez is better than Luck, but talk about overrated.

Luck has a 55% completion percentage and 28 turnovers yet is considered an MVP candidate by ESPN

Hes actually on pace to have 34 turnovers by himself--Its amazing how this Colts team is 9-4.

Yeah four years in the league and Luck has barely improved.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
T0mShane    90,849

That RG3 has a darker complexion than Mark Sanchez.

Remember that time you posted that wicked racist picture of the black kid with the watermelon?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
JiF    125,351

Remember that time you posted that wicked racist picture of the black kid with the watermelon?

Nope.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
FloridaJetsFan    671

Not saying that Sanchez is better than Luck, but talk about overrated.

Bullpussy!!!! Sanchez is SO much better than Luck!! Luck couldn't carry Sancez's jock!!! History will prove us right! You just wait Sucka!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lupz27    8,656

Not saying that Sanchez is better than Luck, but talk about overrated.

Luck has a 55% completion percentage and 28 turnovers yet is considered an MVP candidate by ESPN

Hes actually on pace to have 34 turnovers by himself--Its amazing how this Colts team is 9-4.

It's called bring a rookie QB along the right way! Let him throw it, and continually throw it, he turns it over, you coach him, and tell him keep doing what your doing, and take every mistake you make along the way as a learning tool.

The Colts did this with P Manning, the Giants did it with Eli.

The Jets told Sanchez from day 1 not to turn it over, and killed him every time he did, and took the reigns in every mistake he made, IMO this is part if the reason Sanchez sucks so bad.

When you draft a QB in the 1st round to be your franchise QB from day 1, you have to know this comes with losing, and bad play AKA turnovers, bad decision making, you let them do it, coach them up, and never implement stupid rules on him while he is playing in the game, the goal is for the QB to get better playing his way, and keeping his confidence, never doubting his ability on the field.

This is where the Jets went really really really wrong with Sanchez, they never let him make mistakes, they put to much pressure on him to be a SB winning caliber QB from day 1. If your not willing to deal with the lumps, and growing pains that come with starting a rookie QB from day 1, you don't draft him to start, you either pass on the whole idea, or you get a Vet to bridge the gap for 1-4 years, depending on how raw said QB is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bassmaster2    46

Sanchez did win alot of games for the Jets , he is not a great QB but where are the good wideouts, the wideouts is the problem ,no one can beat man coverage

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

×