FiremanEd42 Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 Not saying that Sanchez is better than Luck, but talk about overrated. Luck has a 55% completion percentage and 28 turnovers yet is considered an MVP candidate by ESPN Hes actually on pace to have 34 turnovers by himself--Its amazing how this Colts team is 9-4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 Oh boy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicious89x Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 OH DIS GUN BE GOOD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiremanEd42 Posted December 10, 2012 Author Share Posted December 10, 2012 Id also be willing to say that 2011 Sanchez was statisitcly better than 2012 Luck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 Id also be willing to say that 2011 Sanchez was statisitcly better than 2012 Luck I'm not sure how much longer we'll be willing to listen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiremanEd42 Posted December 10, 2012 Author Share Posted December 10, 2012 Lets also not discount the head to head matchup between the two--Sanchez 35-Luck 9 I'd take Luck over Sanchez moving forward, but I dont think there is that big of a gap between the two Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicious89x Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 Lets also not discount the head to head matchup between the two--Sanchez 35-Luck 9 I'd take Luck over Sanchez moving forward, but I dont think there is that big of a gap between the two The gap is closing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsjetsjetss Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 Lets also not discount the head to head matchup between the two--Sanchez 35-Luck 9 I'd take Luck over Sanchez moving forward, but I dont think there is that big of a gap between the two even if this was true a rookie qb vs a 4 year starter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZachEY Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 Obvious troll is still obvious Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SayNoToDMC Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 I liked you better when you where trolling at the stadium Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pac Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 Lets also not discount the head to head matchup between the two--Sanchez 35-Luck 9 I'd take Luck over Sanchez moving forward, but I dont think there is that big of a gap between the two Little advice.. when riling up the natives make sure you believe what you're saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 Lets also not discount the head to head matchup between the two--Sanchez 35-Luck 9 I'd take Luck over Sanchez moving forward, but I dont think there is that big of a gap between the two Luck is taller, thats about the only difference I see. Good thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicious89x Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 Little advice.. when riling up the natives make sure you believe what you're saying. Go ahead, tell him about dem statz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SayNoToDMC Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 Luck is taller, thats about the only difference I see. Good thread. And RG3 is just a little faster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbatesman Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 And RG3 is just a little faster That and R3 has a much darker complexion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pac Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 Go ahead, tell him about dem statz. I don't do good with facts and figurin'. can't wrap my head around all those #'s and words. sensory overload. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 Kirk Cousins is already better than Sanchez. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pac Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 Kirk Cousins is already better than Sanchez. Little advice.. when riling up the natives make sure you believe what you're saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicious89x Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 That and R3 has a much darker complexion. What are you trying to say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 Little advice.. when riling up the natives make sure you believe what you're saying. I can't believe you typed out HTML tags to make that joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 What are you trying to say. That RG3 has a darker complexion than Mark Sanchez. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crusher Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Not saying that Sanchez is better than Luck, but talk about overrated. Luck has a 55% completion percentage and 28 turnovers yet is considered an MVP candidate by ESPN Hes actually on pace to have 34 turnovers by himself--Its amazing how this Colts team is 9-4. Yeah four years in the league and Luck has barely improved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 That RG3 has a darker complexion than Mark Sanchez. Remember that time you posted that wicked racist picture of the black kid with the watermelon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Remember that time you posted that wicked racist picture of the black kid with the watermelon? Nope. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatriotReign37 Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Yeah four years in the league and Luck has barely improved. Word Peyton Manning had 31 turnovers in his rookie season. http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/stats/_/id/1428/peyton-manning Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Remember that time you posted that wicked racist picture of the black kid with the watermelon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FloridaJetsFan Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Not saying that Sanchez is better than Luck, but talk about overrated. Bullpussy!!!! Sanchez is SO much better than Luck!! Luck couldn't carry Sancez's jock!!! History will prove us right! You just wait Sucka!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lupz27 Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Not saying that Sanchez is better than Luck, but talk about overrated. Luck has a 55% completion percentage and 28 turnovers yet is considered an MVP candidate by ESPN Hes actually on pace to have 34 turnovers by himself--Its amazing how this Colts team is 9-4. It's called bring a rookie QB along the right way! Let him throw it, and continually throw it, he turns it over, you coach him, and tell him keep doing what your doing, and take every mistake you make along the way as a learning tool. The Colts did this with P Manning, the Giants did it with Eli. The Jets told Sanchez from day 1 not to turn it over, and killed him every time he did, and took the reigns in every mistake he made, IMO this is part if the reason Sanchez sucks so bad. When you draft a QB in the 1st round to be your franchise QB from day 1, you have to know this comes with losing, and bad play AKA turnovers, bad decision making, you let them do it, coach them up, and never implement stupid rules on him while he is playing in the game, the goal is for the QB to get better playing his way, and keeping his confidence, never doubting his ability on the field. This is where the Jets went really really really wrong with Sanchez, they never let him make mistakes, they put to much pressure on him to be a SB winning caliber QB from day 1. If your not willing to deal with the lumps, and growing pains that come with starting a rookie QB from day 1, you don't draft him to start, you either pass on the whole idea, or you get a Vet to bridge the gap for 1-4 years, depending on how raw said QB is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bassmaster2 Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Sanchez did win alot of games for the Jets , he is not a great QB but where are the good wideouts, the wideouts is the problem ,no one can beat man coverage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jets62 Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Ha is this little Jamal at recess? Classic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jets62 Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Lets also not discount the head to head matchup between the two--Sanchez 35-Luck 9 I'd take Luck over Sanchez moving forward, but I dont think there is that big of a gap between the two Please you gotta be kidding! Luck is bigger, stronger arm, more accurate and has much better pocket presence. No comparison. Call up the Colts and tell them they could have Sanchez and we'll take Luck, see what they say. Not a big gap? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 It's called bring a rookie QB along the right way! Let him throw it, and continually throw it, he turns it over, you coach him, and tell him keep doing what your doing, and take every mistake you make along the way as a learning tool. The Colts did this with P Manning, the Giants did it with Eli. The Jets told Sanchez from day 1 not to turn it over, and killed him every time he did, and took the reigns in every mistake he made, IMO this is part if the reason Sanchez sucks so bad. When you draft a QB in the 1st round to be your franchise QB from day 1, you have to know this comes with losing, and bad play AKA turnovers, bad decision making, you let them do it, coach them up, and never implement stupid rules on him while he is playing in the game, the goal is for the QB to get better playing his way, and keeping his confidence, never doubting his ability on the field. This is where the Jets went really really really wrong with Sanchez, they never let him make mistakes, they put to much pressure on him to be a SB winning caliber QB from day 1. If your not willing to deal with the lumps, and growing pains that come with starting a rookie QB from day 1, you don't draft him to start, you either pass on the whole idea, or you get a Vet to bridge the gap for 1-4 years, depending on how raw said QB is. Where the Jets went wrong with Sanchez was in drafting him. He was never ever ever going to be a good QB. Too stupid, too mopey, and no instincts whatsoever. You could give him the game's best OC, QBC, OL, WRs, RBs, and TE; he'd still be among the league's worst. There was no coaching him and there is no coaching him and never will be any coaching him. Total garbage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lupz27 Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Where the Jets went wrong with Sanchez was in drafting him. He was never ever ever going to be a good QB. Too stupid, too mopey, and no instincts whatsoever. You could give him the game's best OC, QBC, OL, WRs, RBs, and TE; he'd still be among the league's worst. There was no coaching him and there is no coaching him and never will be any coaching him. Total garbage. That's a little overboard, but you may be right he would never be a good QB no matter what. But I think he would have had a much better chance if he was drafted by a team that had no problem losing for a year, or two, and built the offense around him, and added weapons on offense to TRY, and develop him further. Like I said your probably right he was never going to be good regardless, and this is in no way to defend Mark, because if he was a good QB he would have been at least serviceable by now, even with all the issues I explained. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 That's a little overboard, but you may be right he would never be a good QB no matter what. But I think he would have had a much better chance if he was drafted by a team that had no problem losing for a year, or two, and built the offense around him, and added weapons on offense to TRY, and develop him further. Like I said your probably right he was never going to be good regardless, and this is in no way to defend Mark, because if he was a good QB he would have been at least serviceable by now, even with all the issues I explained. I would have a better chance of hitting the lottery by buying 1000 tickets instead of 1. Still not going to win either way, though. That's how I see it with Sanchez. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.05f3dc52804d5fd84cf09ccfcd7bd10b.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.