If its Pats vs Giants III
#2
Posted 10 December 2012 - 11:45 PM
42-14
Looks like we might see it again--I actually think Pats win this time around since the Giants pass rush hasnt been there all season
the Pats can't stop Nicks and Cruz AND Marty B all at once
"Maybe I'll die dumb....and leave behind a beautiful corpse known for my hand and my balls like Cy Young" - Royce da 5'9
#3
Posted 10 December 2012 - 11:52 PM
Whoever comes out of the AFC will whip up on the Falcons
#7
Posted 11 December 2012 - 09:13 AM
LOL, wishful thinking. Giants have easiest path to division title
which is why they'll blow it this year.
#8
Posted 11 December 2012 - 09:28 AM
#10
Posted 11 December 2012 - 09:33 AM
What sucks is we're probably looking at Patriots Giants part 3.
#11
Posted 11 December 2012 - 09:42 AM
#12
Posted 11 December 2012 - 09:43 AM
Giants still have to play Atlanta and Baltimore
And both of those teams are struggling. Giants are getting to play teams when they're struggling. Any other year and the Saints probably win on Sunday, but that team is a shell of what they were last year. Amazing what losing a coach can do.
#13
Posted 11 December 2012 - 09:45 AM
And both of those teams are struggling. Giants are getting to play teams when they're struggling. Any other year and the Saints probably win on Sunday, but that team is a shell of what they were last year. Amazing what losing a coach can do.
True. But the Giants are also a really good team. If Nicks is 100% they'll be fine. I think they know they're going to make it...and once theyre in those pass rushers they have always turn it up a bit.
The Giants are talented as hell. Sucks for us.
#14
Posted 11 December 2012 - 09:45 AM
This is their year. Book it.
Pats v GB - Pats win. Just like a predicted preseason.
#15
Posted 11 December 2012 - 09:53 AM
Giants beat the Pats because they were a one dimensional team. The Giants matched up well with them because the Pats pass so much and the Giants strength is their pass rush, not their run-D. Now the Pats have a pretty good rushing attack so the Pats are probably thinking "fine, put all your best pass rushers on the field and we'll just keep running it up the middle".
#16
Posted 11 December 2012 - 09:59 AM
Here's the thing though...
Giants beat the Pats because they were a one dimensional team. The Giants matched up well with them because the Pats pass so much and the Giants strength is their pass rush, not their run-D. Now the Pats have a pretty good rushing attack so the Pats are probably thinking "fine, put all your best pass rushers on the field and we'll just keep running it up the middle".
Yep. This Pats team is different. They can run, they can stop the run and Talib gives them a chance to play man on the outside vs. a guy like Nicks. Plus, now they've got a ton of speed at LB'er, so all those little intermediate routes that you could kill the Pats with the last couple of seasons arent as easy to find. They give up big passing plays down field, but thats also where they create a lot of turnovers.
I think you're about to watch the Pats straight dominate the rest of the season.
#18
Posted 11 December 2012 - 10:17 AM
True. But the Giants are also a really good team. If Nicks is 100% they'll be fine. I think they know they're going to make it...and once theyre in those pass rushers they have always turn it up a bit.
The Giants are talented as hell. Sucks for us.
If David Wilson has earned 20 touches per, nobody is stopping that O. The missing running game has been their issue all year.
#19
Posted 11 December 2012 - 10:20 AM
If David Wilson has earned 20 touches per, nobody is stopping that O. The missing running game has been their issue all year.
Bradshaw is 26 and looks finished.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users















