10 years from now, the NFL will be playing Flag Football.
They are now talking about eliminating all blocking below the waist, so flags may very well be on the way. Thank God for boxing, bull fighting and rugby.
Posted 11 December 2012 - 03:34 PM
10 years from now, the NFL will be playing Flag Football.
Posted 11 December 2012 - 06:49 PM
Want to eliminate high speed collisions ? Take the carbon fiber helmets away.. and use something that reminds the players not to lead with their head.. maybe put a nose ring in the helmet so if they lead with it, it tazes them ?
Posted 11 December 2012 - 07:06 PM
just put flags on them
the nfl is in a tough spot. they are popular because of the violence, but they are getting sued by players because of the violence
whatever
go knicks !
Posted 11 December 2012 - 11:52 PM
It's all whitewashing. In a few years, they'll come out with a helmet designed in conjunction with engineers from Mercedes Benz, and they'll say they solved the concussion problem. Nobody gives a sh*t about the health of the players, including the players. Mike Webster didn't cost the NFL a red cent in lost ticket sales.
Edited by RutgersJetFan, 11 December 2012 - 11:56 PM.
(Chandler)'s a nice piece as long as he's the 7th most important player on your roster....I think they're going to be disappointed when they see he's just a pumped-up Drew Gooden.
Posted 11 December 2012 - 11:59 PM
I agree to an extent, but over the long term, (we're talking a few decades here), there's bound to be some real problems because parents are eventually going to start steering their kids away from the sport. If you had a son, would you really push him towards playing football? Not like if he actually wanted to play, that's different; I'm talking about a parent just signing their kid up because, well, they're a kid and you want them out of the ****ing house, and most of the best athletes in the world have been going at their respective sport since at least their early teens, or even earlier. I can't even begin to imagine the number of kids that wind up having a long career through HS and college because their parents pushed it on them from day one. That's definitely going to shift as time goes on and the NFL has to make sure that doesn't happen. Yes, the league is a money making machine, but that's only right now and it hasn't always been that way. If it doesn't ensure that over the long term it's going to have the best athletes in the world composing its rosters, it's only creating a means for its end.
Posted 12 December 2012 - 12:06 AM
this is the start not just of losing players its the start of a new primetime american sport. Take away what makes the NFL the NFL and people are going to start to not watch. NFL is now biggest league in the USA but we may start to see an evolution to another sport maybe soccer or something
Edited by RutgersJetFan, 12 December 2012 - 12:07 AM.
(Chandler)'s a nice piece as long as he's the 7th most important player on your roster....I think they're going to be disappointed when they see he's just a pumped-up Drew Gooden.
Posted 12 December 2012 - 12:08 AM
Meh, professionals may be smart enough to know the risks going in, but high school and college kids are insanely dumb. If the league wants to take the lead on tweaking some aspects of the game to help combat teenagers falling victim to paralysis, so be it. I'm not a fan of Goodell or Schiano, but their intentions are in the right place with this one.
Edited by jetsjetsjetss, 12 December 2012 - 12:09 AM.
Posted 12 December 2012 - 12:17 AM
I feel you the results are something we can root for but i think the means of getting there are dumb. I know for a fact with a little more effort the gear they wear could be designed to be much safer. Heck when they did that study couple of years ago NFL standard helmets were ranked almost last in protection compared to high school helmets.
getting rid of kickoffs is bleh. Lets try finding a way to protect while doing what they have been.
Edited by RutgersJetFan, 12 December 2012 - 12:18 AM.
(Chandler)'s a nice piece as long as he's the 7th most important player on your roster....I think they're going to be disappointed when they see he's just a pumped-up Drew Gooden.
Posted 12 December 2012 - 12:24 AM

1969 NY Jets
New York Giants just won a championship yet I'm still the third most-talked-about quarterback in my own city.- -- Giants QB Eli Manning
Posted 12 December 2012 - 12:30 AM
I already said I thought the idea was stupid. But it's pretty clear that something has to be changed. The reality of things is that head and spinal injuries only get the attention they need at the pro level, but are needed most at the high school and collegiate levels because that's the group that's the most susceptible to brain and spinal damage in football for obvious reasons. I love how the game is played, but it's pretty obvious that we can't keep everything the same when you've got kids between 14-22 suffering from multiple concussions, getting paralyzed, and dying. And the NFL is the only entity with the money, resources, and most importantly the influence to effectuate any real sort of change because so many of the lower institutions function as factories for colleges, and then colleges for the pros.
Posted 12 December 2012 - 12:37 AM
Posted 12 December 2012 - 12:41 AM
what are you suggesting then?
no one is going to argue that people getting hurt is a bad thing. Problem is its easy to say something but harder to find a solution. This is their solution and im not into it. Id rather see money being spent on specific equipment like a neck brace /newer helmet then changing an aspect of the game. If a scientist says its not possible so be it change away but for right now where there is evidence about better equipment im all for putting all the eggs in that basket
Edited by RutgersJetFan, 12 December 2012 - 12:41 AM.
(Chandler)'s a nice piece as long as he's the 7th most important player on your roster....I think they're going to be disappointed when they see he's just a pumped-up Drew Gooden.
Posted 12 December 2012 - 12:47 AM
It's not a solution, it's an idea. The only way you solve for things like this is through dialogue and experimentation. It's not an easy fix because the rules and aspects of the game are so engrained in every level and facet, from the employees down to the equipment. Though I think this specific idea is particularly bad and wouldn't do much, at the very least it triggers dialogue, which is what always comes first in anything. If you're looking for suggestions and solutions, I'm afraid you're asking the wrong questions, because the first step is identifying exactly what has to be changed, which is what they're currently doing.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users