Jump to content

  •  

Photo
- - - - -

Daily Newz: tebow asking for release if GMC starts


  • Please log in to reply
46 replies to this topic

#41 Gastineau Lives

Gastineau Lives

    99 & 44/100ths% pure beast

  • Members
  • 1,597 posts

Posted 18 December 2012 - 11:53 PM

I've never despised my own team like I do this Jet team. I've hated teams for being sh*tty, but this is a completely different animal. Rex is a fat ****ing buffoon. They should all be out of jobs next year.

It will take years to get the stink off of this franchise. Only a complete housecleaning with Lysol will do it. Get all of these cockroaches out of here. Not only are they bad at their jobs but they are useless as people.

I wish I could set Rex, Tannenbaum, Sanchez, Sparano and Woody adrift on a raft floating on an endless sea, with nothing but their sh*tty, stupid selves to keep them company for eternity. ****s.

Edited by Gastineau Lives, 18 December 2012 - 11:57 PM.


#42 jetsjetsjetss

jetsjetsjetss

    2nd Year Veteran

  • Members
  • 1,870 posts

Posted 19 December 2012 - 02:02 AM

Screw that. If the Jets fed Tebow that line of crap and you want to blast them for that, that's one thing and I won't argue that. But you don't turn around and give him the start just to make sure he doesn't feel bad. That's the same kind of bullsh*t logic that kept Sanchez as the starter to begin with. The bottom line is, the Jets already know what they have in Tebow. The entire league already knows what it has in Tebow. And it's not good. The Jets have to figure out what they have in the one guy on this roster who as least shown some semblance of being able to accurately throw a football, even if the odds are he's not what they're really looking for in a QB.

I don't blame Tebow for being pissed if that's what he was promised, but the Jets need to make the best move for their team at this point, and not worry about the feelings of a guy with one foot already out the door. Especially if the coaching staff never wanted him there to begin with.


didnt rex say gmac gives the team the best chance of winning?!?!?! Sanchez part 2?!?!?!

#43 dbatesman

dbatesman

    Epic Failgoat

  • Members
  • 5,614 posts

Posted 19 December 2012 - 02:10 AM

didnt rex say gmac gives the team the best chance of winning?!?!?! Sanchez part 2?!?!?!


It's a prime situation for Rex to save his ass. If McElroy wins the last two games, Rex makes the case that he was somehow held back from playing him sooner. If McElroy blows it, he adds it to the "This Roster Sucks" file he's presenting to Woody in three weeks.

This is like having a cat with leukemia.


#44 JetsFanInDenver

JetsFanInDenver

    Transition Player

  • Members
  • 6,550 posts

Posted 19 December 2012 - 02:10 AM

Ten years down the road when NFL Network is doing a show about the most boneheaded moves a team made in the NFL, the Tebow move will be right up there in the Top 3. I still cannot fathom a football reason why the JETS traded for Tebow.

#45 GimmeShelter

GimmeShelter

    NFL Alumni

  • Members
  • 9,010 posts

Posted 19 December 2012 - 06:12 AM

This is bs, a lot has changed since they made that promise. He is a little bitch if this is true.


Correct they got to see up close and daily in practice that he is not a NFL QB.

#46 JetPotato

JetPotato

    Practice Squad Player

  • Members
  • 197 posts

Posted 19 December 2012 - 08:30 AM

All I know is this, if Tim Tebow says that Mike Tannenbaum and Woody Johnson misled him, I'm inclined to believe the guy for 2 reasons. 1) I firmly believe that he has never told a lie in his life. And 2) Mike Tannenbaum and Woody Johnson are bad people.


He lies every time he refers to himself as a quarterback

#47 Lurking Troll

Lurking Troll

    Practice Squad Player

  • Members
  • 129 posts

Posted 19 December 2012 - 09:04 AM

But the Jets have to give McElroy a start to see if he can average 29 passing yards a game or if he peaked in that miracle win.

Edited by Lurking Troll, 19 December 2012 - 09:04 AM.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users