Jump to content

  •  

Photo
- - - - -

Disturbing Jets Stats


  • Please log in to reply
26 replies to this topic

#1 Maxman

Maxman

    Mr. Jet Nation

  • Administrators
  • 54,183 posts
  • LocationJN Server Room

Posted 27 December 2012 - 03:18 AM

The Jets are -16 on the season is sacks to sacks allowed.

Another disturbing Jets stat. No receivers with 1,000 yards, only 1 receiver with over 325 yards receiving. That is hard to believe.
<br />

#2 SayNoToDMC

SayNoToDMC

    In search of terminally ill online girlfriend

  • Members
  • 3,637 posts

Posted 27 December 2012 - 03:25 AM

Sad thing is neither of these stats stand out as surprising. I thought the sack differential would be worse, especially after last week. Did we get the credit for Brandon Moore's ass's 2 sacks?

Edited by SayNoToDMC, 27 December 2012 - 03:26 AM.

Posted Image


#3 Maxman

Maxman

    Mr. Jet Nation

  • Administrators
  • 54,183 posts
  • LocationJN Server Room

Posted 27 December 2012 - 04:50 AM

Sad thing is neither of these stats stand out as surprising. I thought the sack differential would be worse, especially after last week. Did we get the credit for Brandon Moore's ass's 2 sacks?


The sack diff was definitely hurt by giving up 52 sacks last week. Luckily Wilkerson and Coples have been bringing in sacks the past few weeks.

I would have to look but it will be interesting where the Jets # 2 WR ends up yard wise. It could be in historically low territory. That is scary stuff 325 yards for your # 2 WR. I can't even really comprehend that.
<br />

#4 SayNoToDMC

SayNoToDMC

    In search of terminally ill online girlfriend

  • Members
  • 3,637 posts

Posted 27 December 2012 - 05:32 AM

The sack diff was definitely hurt by giving up 52 sacks last week. Luckily Wilkerson and Coples have been bringing in sacks the past few weeks.

I would have to look but it will be interesting where the Jets # 2 WR ends up yard wise. It could be in historically low territory. That is scary stuff 325 yards for your # 2 WR. I can't even really comprehend that.


Sanchez and Tanny have no place getting paid for what they do right now but you're the one I feel bad for. sh*t like this gives Courtney viable ammunition on the podcast, our offense is really a joke

Edited by SayNoToDMC, 27 December 2012 - 05:32 AM.

Posted Image


#5 pointman

pointman

    sandwiches are good.

  • Members
  • 4,028 posts

Posted 27 December 2012 - 07:22 AM

Holmes, Braylon, Kerley, Keller... not bad. Not great, but not bad. If we can get someone to throw them the ball... f it.

#6 Jetfan13

Jetfan13

    older but better

  • Members
  • 6,128 posts

Posted 27 December 2012 - 10:27 AM

Holmes, Braylon, Kerley, Keller... not bad. Not great, but not bad. If we can get someone to throw them the ball... f it.


Holmes out since week 5 or 6, Edwards played 1 game, Kerley not bad, Keller missed about 6 or 7 games....Marino would suck with that suporting staff. Cant blame Sanchez for having no-one to throw to.
24 hours in a day, 24 beers in a case. Coincidence? I think not.

#7 JiF

JiF

    New Beginnings with Rex Ryan

  • Members
  • 31,203 posts
  • LocationSomewhere between Heaven and Hell

Posted 27 December 2012 - 10:37 AM

The Jets are -16 on the season is sacks to sacks allowed.

Another disturbing Jets stat. No receivers with 1,000 yards, only 1 receiver with over 325 yards receiving. That is hard to believe.


Did you see the stat about not having a Super Bowl appereance in 40+ years? Thats a distrubing one too...
Posted Image

#8 faba

faba

    Moderator

  • Moderators
  • 22,310 posts
  • LocationHolmdel

Posted 27 December 2012 - 10:42 AM

The whole offense was disturbing this year to our defense
Treat people with how you want to be treated-with respect.

#9 Jetscode1

Jetscode1

    Veteran

  • Members
  • 6,086 posts
  • LocationNorth America; Western Hemisphere; the Earth; the Solar System; the Universe; the Mind of God

Posted 27 December 2012 - 11:13 AM

The sack diff was definitely hurt by giving up 52 sacks last week. Luckily Wilkerson and Coples have been bringing in sacks the past few weeks.

I would have to look but it will be interesting where the Jets # 2 WR ends up yard wise. It could be in historically low territory. That is scary stuff 325 yards for your # 2 WR. I can't even really comprehend that.


But wait...isn't the defense top 5 statistically again...that's what counts right?

Rex Ryan is Buddy's son.
“Live as if you were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live forever.”
Mahatma Gandhi

#10 KSJets

KSJets

    The Hammer

  • Members
  • 3,837 posts
  • LocationPlainsboro, NJ

Posted 28 December 2012 - 12:52 AM

Dustin Keller is tied for 2nd on the team with 28 catches and 3rd in yards with 317...and he's missed 7 or 8 games. That was so depressing. I know there was a thread similar to this recently, but I think it's worth repeating :(
"This "breaking news" was addressed a few weeks ago. The Pats suck and all of their accomplishments are bogus as they cheated." - Gainzo

#11 T0mShane

T0mShane

    Of the ilk.

  • Members
  • 17,155 posts

Posted 28 December 2012 - 06:19 AM

Better stat:

Times T0mShane has been right about the Jets: 1,354,578

Times KSJets has been right about the Jets: -568
Well, that's the internet, man: 9 billion tough guys who secretly want to touch your pee-pee.

#12 Maxman

Maxman

    Mr. Jet Nation

  • Administrators
  • 54,183 posts
  • LocationJN Server Room

Posted 29 December 2012 - 12:05 AM

Better stat:

Times T0mShane has been right about the Jets: 1,354,578

Times KSJets has been right about the Jets: -568


Is this the post you guys are talking about?
<br />

#13 Maxman

Maxman

    Mr. Jet Nation

  • Administrators
  • 54,183 posts
  • LocationJN Server Room

Posted 29 December 2012 - 12:06 AM

Crap. Wrong forum. My bad.
<br />

#14 KSJets

KSJets

    The Hammer

  • Members
  • 3,837 posts
  • LocationPlainsboro, NJ

Posted 29 December 2012 - 12:16 AM

Yes, this was the one I was thinking about. Thanks Max.

As far as T0mshane's idiotic statement...

When you throw sh*t against the wall enough times, some of it is bound to stick.

That pretty much sums up your posting history.
"This "breaking news" was addressed a few weeks ago. The Pats suck and all of their accomplishments are bogus as they cheated." - Gainzo

#15 Sperm Edwards

Sperm Edwards

    Penis

  • Moderators
  • 23,585 posts

Posted 29 December 2012 - 03:49 AM

Crap. Wrong forum. My bad.


You're know, you're a real idiot sometimes. And I say that in the nicest way.

JetNation


2446sd4.jpg

 

 

Morn - hin - weg


#16 The Crusher

The Crusher

    Ready to compete

  • Moderators
  • 24,001 posts

Posted 29 December 2012 - 08:04 AM

You're know, you're a real idiot sometimes. And I say that in the nicest way.



Ahh shoot.
Posted Image

#17 JFtoLong

JFtoLong

    big wet douche

  • Banned
  • 1,294 posts
  • Locationgrassy knoll

Posted 29 December 2012 - 08:07 AM

Another disturbing Jets stat. No receivers with 1,000 yards, only 1 receiver with over 325 yards receiving. That is hard to believe.


Rex Ryan football! Welcome to 1935!

Edited by JFtoLong, 29 December 2012 - 08:07 AM.


#18 Thor99

Thor99

    Stifling your creativity

  • Moderators
  • 17,132 posts

Posted 29 December 2012 - 08:45 AM

You're know, you're a real idiot sometimes. And I say that in the nicest way.


Says the guy who doesn't know how to make a photo account private.
Look at me
I'm a tangled puppet
I might be a mess
But I sure can survive

#19 Sperm Edwards

Sperm Edwards

    Penis

  • Moderators
  • 23,585 posts

Posted 29 December 2012 - 09:29 AM

Says the guy who doesn't know how to make a photo account private.


Yes. Says that guy.

JetNation


2446sd4.jpg

 

 

Morn - hin - weg


#20 jack48

jack48

    2nd Year Veteran

  • Members
  • 3,024 posts

Posted 29 December 2012 - 09:27 PM

The Jets are -16 on the season is sacks to sacks allowed.

Another disturbing Jets stat. No receivers with 1,000 yards, only 1 receiver with over 325 yards receiving. That is hard to believe.


I know. How did one of our receivers ever gain that many yards with Sanchez behind center?




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users