Maxman Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 The Jets are -16 on the season is sacks to sacks allowed. Another disturbing Jets stat. No receivers with 1,000 yards, only 1 receiver with over 325 yards receiving. That is hard to believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SayNoToDMC Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 Sad thing is neither of these stats stand out as surprising. I thought the sack differential would be worse, especially after last week. Did we get the credit for Brandon Moore's ass's 2 sacks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted December 27, 2012 Author Share Posted December 27, 2012 Sad thing is neither of these stats stand out as surprising. I thought the sack differential would be worse, especially after last week. Did we get the credit for Brandon Moore's ass's 2 sacks? The sack diff was definitely hurt by giving up 52 sacks last week. Luckily Wilkerson and Coples have been bringing in sacks the past few weeks. I would have to look but it will be interesting where the Jets # 2 WR ends up yard wise. It could be in historically low territory. That is scary stuff 325 yards for your # 2 WR. I can't even really comprehend that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SayNoToDMC Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 The sack diff was definitely hurt by giving up 52 sacks last week. Luckily Wilkerson and Coples have been bringing in sacks the past few weeks. I would have to look but it will be interesting where the Jets # 2 WR ends up yard wise. It could be in historically low territory. That is scary stuff 325 yards for your # 2 WR. I can't even really comprehend that. Sanchez and Tanny have no place getting paid for what they do right now but you're the one I feel bad for. sh*t like this gives Courtney viable ammunition on the podcast, our offense is really a joke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pointman Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 Holmes, Braylon, Kerley, Keller... not bad. Not great, but not bad. If we can get someone to throw them the ball... f it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetfan13 Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 Holmes, Braylon, Kerley, Keller... not bad. Not great, but not bad. If we can get someone to throw them the ball... f it. Holmes out since week 5 or 6, Edwards played 1 game, Kerley not bad, Keller missed about 6 or 7 games....Marino would suck with that suporting staff. Cant blame Sanchez for having no-one to throw to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 The Jets are -16 on the season is sacks to sacks allowed. Another disturbing Jets stat. No receivers with 1,000 yards, only 1 receiver with over 325 yards receiving. That is hard to believe. Did you see the stat about not having a Super Bowl appereance in 40+ years? Thats a distrubing one too... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faba Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 The whole offense was disturbing this year to our defense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetscode1 Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 The sack diff was definitely hurt by giving up 52 sacks last week. Luckily Wilkerson and Coples have been bringing in sacks the past few weeks. I would have to look but it will be interesting where the Jets # 2 WR ends up yard wise. It could be in historically low territory. That is scary stuff 325 yards for your # 2 WR. I can't even really comprehend that. But wait...isn't the defense top 5 statistically again...that's what counts right? Rex Ryan is Buddy's son. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KSJets Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 Dustin Keller is tied for 2nd on the team with 28 catches and 3rd in yards with 317...and he's missed 7 or 8 games. That was so depressing. I know there was a thread similar to this recently, but I think it's worth repeating Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 Better stat: Times T0mShane has been right about the Jets: 1,354,578 Times KSJets has been right about the Jets: -568 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted December 29, 2012 Author Share Posted December 29, 2012 Better stat: Times T0mShane has been right about the Jets: 1,354,578 Times KSJets has been right about the Jets: -568 Is this the post you guys are talking about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted December 29, 2012 Author Share Posted December 29, 2012 Crap. Wrong forum. My bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KSJets Posted December 29, 2012 Share Posted December 29, 2012 Yes, this was the one I was thinking about. Thanks Max. As far as T0mshane's idiotic statement... When you throw sh*t against the wall enough times, some of it is bound to stick. That pretty much sums up your posting history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted December 29, 2012 Share Posted December 29, 2012 Crap. Wrong forum. My bad. You're know, you're a real idiot sometimes. And I say that in the nicest way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crusher Posted December 29, 2012 Share Posted December 29, 2012 You're know, you're a real idiot sometimes. And I say that in the nicest way. Ahh shoot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFtoLong Posted December 29, 2012 Share Posted December 29, 2012 Another disturbing Jets stat. No receivers with 1,000 yards, only 1 receiver with over 325 yards receiving. That is hard to believe. Rex Ryan football! Welcome to 1935! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor99 Posted December 29, 2012 Share Posted December 29, 2012 You're know, you're a real idiot sometimes. And I say that in the nicest way. Says the guy who doesn't know how to make a photo account private. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted December 29, 2012 Share Posted December 29, 2012 Says the guy who doesn't know how to make a photo account private. Yes. Says that guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack48 Posted December 30, 2012 Share Posted December 30, 2012 The Jets are -16 on the season is sacks to sacks allowed. Another disturbing Jets stat. No receivers with 1,000 yards, only 1 receiver with over 325 yards receiving. That is hard to believe. I know. How did one of our receivers ever gain that many yards with Sanchez behind center? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bergen Jet Posted December 30, 2012 Share Posted December 30, 2012 Danny Woodhead is 5th on the Pats in receiving yards, his total would be second on the Jets. Kerley who leads the Jets would be 4th on the Pats... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildthing2022000 Posted December 30, 2012 Share Posted December 30, 2012 The Jets are -16 on the season is sacks to sacks allowed. Another disturbing Jets stat. No receivers with 1,000 yards, only 1 receiver with over 325 yards receiving. That is hard to believe. Jets WRs with 30+ catches in 2012 - 1, 40+ - 1 Jets WRs with 30+ catches in 2011 - 5, 40+ - 4 10+ catches in 2012 - 10 10+ catches in 2011 - 7 Rushing attack is better than 2011 by 71 yards on 15 more carries in 1 less game. Scoring was way down 14 fewer TD's than 2011. If they blowout the Bills(30+ points with 500 yards of offense) the numbers won't be too far off from 2011. Both are still worse than 2010 though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoFlaJets Posted December 30, 2012 Share Posted December 30, 2012 What is really disturbing about the WR stats is that only Kerley (53 catches out of 91 times targeted) and Schilens (28 outta 41) caught more than 50% of the balls thrown to them Holmes 20 catches outta 41 Our big WR and 2nd rd DP Stephen Hill was horrid 21 out of 47, Clyde Gates who doesn't even BELONG on a pro roster was 16/34, this could very well be the worst receiving corps that the Jets have EVER fielded Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoFlaJets Posted December 30, 2012 Share Posted December 30, 2012 Here are the 2012 Jets stats-see what else we can cull out of ths mess http://espn.go.com/nfl/team/stats/_/name/nyj/new-york-jets Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted December 30, 2012 Share Posted December 30, 2012 What is really disturbing about the WR stats is that only Kerley (53 catches out of 91 times targeted) and Schilens (28 outta 41) caught more than 50% of the balls thrown to them Holmes 20 catches outta 41 Our big WR and 2nd rd DP Stephen Hill was horrid 21 out of 47, Clyde Gates who doesn't even BELONG on a pro roster was 16/34, this could very well be the worst receiving corps that the Jets have EVER fielded Brutal. Simply brutal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faba Posted December 30, 2012 Share Posted December 30, 2012 Yes our receivers were part of this mess we had on offense this year. Everyone gets the blame for it players and coaches and GM that put it together Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted December 30, 2012 Share Posted December 30, 2012 don't waste filet mignon on a dog. new qb before new wr corps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.