Disturbing Jets Stats
#3
Posted 27 December 2012 - 04:50 AM
Sad thing is neither of these stats stand out as surprising. I thought the sack differential would be worse, especially after last week. Did we get the credit for Brandon Moore's ass's 2 sacks?
The sack diff was definitely hurt by giving up 52 sacks last week. Luckily Wilkerson and Coples have been bringing in sacks the past few weeks.
I would have to look but it will be interesting where the Jets # 2 WR ends up yard wise. It could be in historically low territory. That is scary stuff 325 yards for your # 2 WR. I can't even really comprehend that.
#4
Posted 27 December 2012 - 05:32 AM
The sack diff was definitely hurt by giving up 52 sacks last week. Luckily Wilkerson and Coples have been bringing in sacks the past few weeks.
I would have to look but it will be interesting where the Jets # 2 WR ends up yard wise. It could be in historically low territory. That is scary stuff 325 yards for your # 2 WR. I can't even really comprehend that.
Sanchez and Tanny have no place getting paid for what they do right now but you're the one I feel bad for. sh*t like this gives Courtney viable ammunition on the podcast, our offense is really a joke
Edited by SayNoToDMC, 27 December 2012 - 05:32 AM.

#6
Posted 27 December 2012 - 10:27 AM
Holmes, Braylon, Kerley, Keller... not bad. Not great, but not bad. If we can get someone to throw them the ball... f it.
Holmes out since week 5 or 6, Edwards played 1 game, Kerley not bad, Keller missed about 6 or 7 games....Marino would suck with that suporting staff. Cant blame Sanchez for having no-one to throw to.
#7
Posted 27 December 2012 - 10:37 AM
The Jets are -16 on the season is sacks to sacks allowed.
Another disturbing Jets stat. No receivers with 1,000 yards, only 1 receiver with over 325 yards receiving. That is hard to believe.
Did you see the stat about not having a Super Bowl appereance in 40+ years? Thats a distrubing one too...
#9
Posted 27 December 2012 - 11:13 AM
The sack diff was definitely hurt by giving up 52 sacks last week. Luckily Wilkerson and Coples have been bringing in sacks the past few weeks.
I would have to look but it will be interesting where the Jets # 2 WR ends up yard wise. It could be in historically low territory. That is scary stuff 325 yards for your # 2 WR. I can't even really comprehend that.
But wait...isn't the defense top 5 statistically again...that's what counts right?
Rex Ryan is Buddy's son.
Mahatma Gandhi
#10
Posted 28 December 2012 - 12:52 AM
#14
Posted 29 December 2012 - 12:16 AM
As far as T0mshane's idiotic statement...
When you throw sh*t against the wall enough times, some of it is bound to stick.
That pretty much sums up your posting history.
#15
Posted 29 December 2012 - 03:49 AM
Crap. Wrong forum. My bad.
You're know, you're a real idiot sometimes. And I say that in the nicest way.
#19
Posted 29 December 2012 - 09:29 AM
Says the guy who doesn't know how to make a photo account private.
Yes. Says that guy.
#20
Posted 29 December 2012 - 09:27 PM
The Jets are -16 on the season is sacks to sacks allowed.
Another disturbing Jets stat. No receivers with 1,000 yards, only 1 receiver with over 325 yards receiving. That is hard to believe.
I know. How did one of our receivers ever gain that many yards with Sanchez behind center?
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users















