Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

Do the Jets stay at 9, trade up or trade down ?

Do the Jets stay at 9, trade up or trade down ?   52 votes

  1. 1. Do the Jets stay at 9, trade up or trade down?

    • The Jets stay at #9
      29
    • The Jets trade up from #9
      1
    • The Jets trade down from #9
      22

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.


66 posts in this topic

Posted (edited) · Report post

Useless post is useless. 

Edited by SenorGato
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Is it possible DaMontre Moore turns into a Suggs situation? By that I mean failing to break a 4.8 and getting gift wrapped to Ryan at the end of the top ten.

 

it's very possible and that's another risk worth taking at 9

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

it's very possible and that's another risk worth taking at 9

Mel Kiper and Todd McShay both now saying Jonathan Cooper may go into Top5-10 after combine.

You think Idzik goes old school?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

With the number of needs we have, it would be wise to trade down 4-5 spots a couple of times and pick up 2-3 extra picks in the mid rounds. I'd trade down n the 2nd round too. If we are targetting a player thats project a few picks before our 2nd rounder, I'd trade down from our 1st rounder, than trading up in the 2nd.

 

We really need picks this year and next and hit on most.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

With the number of needs we have, it would be wise to trade down 4-5 spots a couple of times and pick up 2-3 extra picks in the mid rounds. I'd trade down n the 2nd round too. If we are targetting a player thats project a few picks before our 2nd rounder, I'd trade down from our 1st rounder, than trading up in the 2nd.

 

We really need picks this year and next and hit on most.

ya, i remember Pats doin that a few years ago and I was saying 'they are gonna have a slew of picks in next year or two'

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Mel Kiper and Todd McShay both now saying Jonathan Cooper may go into Top5-10 after combine.

You think Idzik goes old school?

 

When Idzik looks at this roster, he probably sees a half dozen positions more dire need than guard. So no. 

 

I rarely like the trade down but if the Jets can get a future 1 plus picks this year (that's the historical price for a playoff team to move up) then stockpiling would be a good thing. This team really lacks depth. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

When Idzik looks at this roster, he probably sees a half dozen positions more dire need than guard. So no. 

 

I rarely like the trade down but if the Jets can get a future 1 plus picks this year (that's the historical price for a playoff team to move up) then stockpiling would be a good thing. This team really lacks depth. 

If we can get a 28-32 #1 in 2013 and a 2014 #1 sign me up now.

use our 1st round on BPA and use our 2nd round pick on RB Gio Bernard

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Mel Kiper and Todd McShay both now saying Jonathan Cooper may go into Top5-10 after combine.

You think Idzik goes old school?

That's not old school. It's never been in vogue to take a guard in the top ten, and it never should be.

That said, I hope Cooper and Warmack both go in the top 8, giving the Jets a better choice of pass rushers. But it'll never happen.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

That's not old school. It's never been in vogue to take a guard in the top ten, and it never should be.

That said, I hope Cooper and Warmack both go in the top 8, giving the Jets a better choice of pass rushers. But it'll never happen.

LOL. Old Old school u young whippersnapper ;)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

LOL. Old Old school u young whippersnapper ;)

Luckily Idzik is closer to my age than yours. :)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Luckily Idzik is closer to my age than yours. :)

LOL, BUT remember, he was once  a IBMer like I still am ;)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

LOL, BUT remember, he was once  a IBMer like I still am ;)

That's cool. If he's breaking out the spreadsheets, he knows the rate of a return on a guard is just way too low to invest a top ten pick. You need to take a potential impact player there.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

That's cool. If he's breaking out the spreadsheets, he knows the rate of a return on a guard is just way too low to invest a top ten pick. You need to take a potential impact player there.

LOL, usually yes,, but you just never know. I'll call him and say take Gio Bernard in 2nd ;)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

LOL, usually yes,, but you just never know. I'll call him and say take Gio Bernard in 2nd ;)

 

Then complain that Idzik didn't listen when the Bengals pick him at the top of the 2nd before our pick?   :winking0001:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Then complain that Idzik didn't listen when the Bengals pick him at the top of the 2nd before our pick?   :winking0001:

Ya agree, I am hearing Bengals are eyeing him BIGTIME.

 

To get Gio we will have to leapfrog them in 2nd or via tradedown out of #9 move get a pick before Bengals (low 1st , high 2nd)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I like to see the Jets move down and gain extra picks , take the best RB in the draft

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I like to see the Jets move down and gain extra picks , take the best RB in the draft

 

Sounds sort of like SJ's plan, but I don't think they'll be able to pull it off.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Sounds sort of like SJ's plan, but I don't think they'll be able to pull it off.

I think they should stay at #9. They should have a choice of pass rushers there, easily the #2 need on the team behind QB.

I also think there's a good chance they'll land a late first rounder for trading one of their CBs. That would put them in prime position for the draft's top RB, or their choice of QBs.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

The Jets have a ton of needs and the draft is pretty strong in the 2nd-3rd round range this year. Not that strong in the top 10 though and they could get a guy with a similar amount of question marks later than they could at 9 IMO. It would be ideal to move down and pick up another day 2 selection.

 

That said, who wants to move up ahead of the Titans and Chargers and for what player? Trading down is easier said than done, you need somebody to want to move up too. Maybe some team looking for an offensive lineman if they want to grab Warmack ahead of the Titans or Fisher ahead of the Chargers if he's on the board, but that's about all I can think of. I'd be surprised if Warmack goes top 10 or Fisher is available at 9 though - but it is very early.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I think they should stay at #9. They should have a choice of pass rushers there, easily the #2 need on the team behind QB.

I also think there's a good chance they'll land a late first rounder for trading one of their CBs. That would put them in prime position for the draft's top RB, or their choice of QBs.

The Jets need must think about the other side of the ball , the team scores only 10 points a game , stop going Defence every 1 pick of the draft , the Jets could have the best D in the NFL but if you can not score points the team is not going to win and there are no good QB in the draft

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited) · Report post

 

problem is unless your drafting a beast Oline guy (not sexy pick/ definite need) or find a gem of a qb your not gonna help the offense all that much

Edited by jetsjetsjetss
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I think they should stay at #9. They should have a choice of pass rushers there, easily the #2 need on the team behind QB.

I also think there's a good chance they'll land a late first rounder for trading one of their CBs. That would put them in prime position for the draft's top RB, or their choice of QBs.

Completely agree with this. Good thing Dummy's imbalanced roster leaves us with two of the best pieces of trade bait out there at a position even good teams can't find one guy at.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Sounds sort of like SJ's plan, but I don't think they'll be able to pull it off.

I chat with him before , we agree the Jets need a bid time RB , The Jets need to think offence for a change , we need to score points

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

The problem is "for a change" isn't a good enough reason to force yourself into a position on draft day.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

The top of this draft nothing special but it is deeper at certain positions- so it makes sense to trade down and get extra picks IMO

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.