SouthernJet Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 Sort of like the old LifeBoat drills managers do at companies to 'rate ' employees to determine layoffs. If you could keep any 5 Jets for 2013 who would they be? Forget the cap and all other stuff (this is for fun and pure talent reasons), just what 5 jets do you think bring most talent, skills, intangibles etc that make you say "I want those 5" 1. Revis 2. Mo Wilkerson 3. Mangold 4. Coples 5. Cromartie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 My list is the same as yours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthernJet Posted February 12, 2013 Author Share Posted February 12, 2013 My list is the same as yours. Great minds think alike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJ Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 Great minds think alike I think there will be a lot of great minds on this one - same 5 here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 I'm not a huge Ferguson fan, but LT > C and I'd certainly keep him over Coples. The beauty of Coples is that he is on a reasonable rookie deal, but while I like his potential I haven't seen the surefire star the rest of the board has. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SayNoToDMC Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 Try naming 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unbanmadmike1 Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 I would keep D'Brick over Coples and Cromarte. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HessStation Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 I would keep D'Brick over Coples and Cromarte. I was thinking the same. So Revis, Mo, Mangold, D'Brick, Cro would probably be my 5...Coples would be #6 on the list fwiw though. Landry right behind him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bugg Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 I'm not a huge Ferguson fan, but LT > C and I'd certainly keep him over Coples. The beauty of Coples is that he is on a reasonable rookie deal, but while I like his potential I haven't seen the surefire star the rest of the board has. This. Coples shows flashes but not every down consistency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 MANTI Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 END THREAD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HessStation Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 MANTI It's honestly going to be interesting to see who takes him and where. Just a gut feeling but I'm seriously thinking late 2nd/early 3rd right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyCarl40 Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 It's honestly going to be interesting to see who takes him and where. Just a gut feeling but I'm seriously thinking late 2nd/early 3rd right now. Don't be silly. He's still going first day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HessStation Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 Don't be silly. He's still going first day. Probably. But just a gut feeling for now...pre-combine/pro day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SayNoToDMC Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 Don't be silly. He's still going first day. Is it as all possible you're bias in your opinion? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 I'm not a huge Ferguson fan, but LT > C and I'd certainly keep him over Coples. The beauty of Coples is that he is on a reasonable rookie deal, but while I like his potential I haven't seen the surefire star the rest of the board has. Good point. I'd maybe keep Brick over Mangold or Coples. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 Try naming 10 Revis Wilkerson Brick Mangold Cromartie Coples Brandon Moore Laron Landry Stephen Hill Demario Davis Ugh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoicsentry Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 Revis Cro Mangold Wilkerson Brick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoicsentry Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 Try naming 10 Wilkerson Coples Brick Mangold Revis Cro DeVito Harris Keller Holmes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyCarl40 Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 Is it as all possible you're bias in you're opinion? Of course. But talent outweighs what amounts to not much. He'll slide a bit but someone will take him in the first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 FIfteen, no order after the first three: Revis Wilkerson D'Brick Mangold Coples Cromartie Landry Holmes Moore Hill Davis Pouha Wilson Harris Keller Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JollyGreenGiant Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 Landry, Revis, Ferguson, Wilkerson, Kerley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoicsentry Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 Landry, Revis, Ferguson, Wilkerson, Kerley Kerley, Landry and Wilkerson all over Mangold? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmd71 Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 Revis Mangold Wilkerson Coples D'Brick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthernJet Posted February 13, 2013 Author Share Posted February 13, 2013 Revis Mangold Wilkerson Coples D'Brick Interesting list,, smaller the list , the harder it is, thats why they call it the LifeBoat Drill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whodeawhodat Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 Revis Wilkerson Brick Mangold Cromartie Coples Brandon Moore Laron Landry Stephen Hill Demario Davis Ugh. I dont know how you can put davis over kerley or holmes but my 5 was the same as the OP before i opened the thread. Was thinking maybe brick over cro but after this last year, Cro was playing with his hair on fiyah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 I dont know how you can put davis over kerley or holmes but my 5 was the same as the OP before i opened the thread. Was thinking maybe brick over cro but after this last year, Cro was playing with his hair on fiyah. Forgot about Kerley, but I don't over-rate him like other fans. He's the silver lining of our WR corps. Holmes I'd drop in a heartbeat. I kept a combination of players that have shown they are our best, and a couple that have much higher ceilings that what we've seen from them... mostly because the guys they were drafted to replaced are terrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whodeawhodat Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 Forgot about Kerley, but I don't over-rate him like other fans. He's the silver lining of our WR corps. Holmes I'd drop in a heartbeat. I kept a combination of players that have shown they are our best, and a couple that have much higher ceilings that what we've seen from them... mostly because the guys they were drafted to replaced are terrible. surprised you have seen that from Davis. Kerley with zero help from QB or other WRs this year showed much more IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stugotz81 Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 1. REVIS 2. REVIS 3. REVIS 4. REVIS 5. REVIS 6. WILKERSON 7. MANGOLD 8. COPLES 9. LANDRY 10. CRO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 Kerley, Landry and Wilkerson all over Mangold? Wilkerson over Mangold isn't a hard choice as great as Mangold can be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 I remember 2010 when Holmes was getting a handy from everyone on this board. You are no longer shiny, sir. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoicsentry Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 Wilkerson over Mangold isn't a hard choice as great as Mangold can be. Um.... what? Why? I think you're exaggerating now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 Um.... what? Why? I think you're exaggerating now. A great interior DL talent is harder to find than a great interior OL talent. Teams spend years looking for a DL like Wilkerson. Meanwhile Jonathan Goodwin, Mawae's old backup here, has been to two Super Bowls in the past 5 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 I remember 2010 when Holmes was getting a handy from everyone on this board. You are no longer shiny, sir. Ooooooof course yoooooouuuuu doooooooo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BroadwayJoe12 Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 Um.... what? Why? I think you're exaggerating now. It's just that the overall difference in play between the best center in the league and the league average, is nowhere near that of the difference between the top 34 DE and a league average. It's not saying Mangold isn't awesome, he is, but guys like Wilkerson have much more of an impact and are usually harder to find. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.