Riveting analysis. As usual.
I'll leave the highly in-depth, analytical breakdowns to genius' like you.
I think Wilson is the best of all 3...
Wilson, Kaep, Luck, RG3
WOW you're good!!!
Posted 15 February 2013 - 12:12 PM
Actually, there is no evidence that he ignored you. It's nice to think that we could have gotten Wilson with our 3rd, but it isn't factually correct. Horrible as the Jets were, they picked a few slots behind those dominant Seahawks. That is why the Jets traded "up" with Seattle to pick Hill and why Wilson was not available in the 3rd when the Jets took Demario Davis. They would have had to use their 2nd or heaven forfend, trade up to nab Wilson.
Stupid Tanny. Why didn't he listen?
LOL, ya , I know, but felt we should have manuevered a bit to get him ![]()

Posted 15 February 2013 - 12:13 PM
The alleged mobile QB doesn't win the Super Bowl until they stop being mobile. They're shoot-first point guards. Brady, Ben, Flacco, and Eli can't break a 5.6 in the 40, but they've got rings. Luck will win more playoff games than Wilson and RGIII combined.
QB is obviously the most important position but it's not like they're a starting pitcher or goalie either. Just saying, the team surrounding them has to be taken into consideration as part of the equation (Coaching and talent). Unfortunately that's a whole other debate...but that said, I think Luck, hands down, had the worst talent and coaching surrounding him out of the four and still made it to the playoffs.
Edited by HessStation, 15 February 2013 - 12:14 PM.
Posted 15 February 2013 - 12:13 PM
The alleged mobile QB doesn't win the Super Bowl until they stop being mobile. They're shoot-first point guards. Brady, Ben, Flacco, and Eli can't break a 5.6 in the 40, but they've got rings. Luck will win more playoff games than Wilson and RGIII combined.
how about more playoff wins than Sanchez, Wilson, and RG3 combined.
Posted 15 February 2013 - 12:14 PM
Luck is the best, by far, and it isn't close.
I don't think so. He may be the better QB, but not by far. If I had to pick, I'd pick Wilson right now. Luck had too many turnovers, which is normal for a rookie starting QB. Russell didn't. Luck had far more passing yards than Russell, but thats because Seahawks were a far superior run team than Colts. They didn't have to throw as much. This is evident by the number of TDs to attempts ratio each player had:
Andrew Luck 23 in 627 attempts (27.26 attempts per TD)
Russell Wilson 26 in 393 attempts (15.11 attempts per TD, almost half of Luck)
Stats don't tell the whole story. The only knock on Russell was that he was considered too short to play the game and didn't have downfield vision. I think after running for almost 500 yards and passing at over 100 QB rating, that notion can be dismissed. I'd build my team around Wilson as well (or Kapernick). QB position is evolving in to a scrambling QB. Brady has next to no mobility. If he was even 10% of Russell or Kaep, he would have had several more rings.
Posted 15 February 2013 - 12:16 PM
Edited by Matt39, 15 February 2013 - 12:17 PM.
Posted 15 February 2013 - 12:19 PM
I'll leave the highly in-depth, analytical breakdowns to genius' like you.
WOW you're good!!!
Posted 15 February 2013 - 12:21 PM
I stole this from somewhere else but it's a good template to work from if you want to debate which young QB you're taking to start a team. This is in terms of college prospects but the fact that we know a little bit more about these guys only helps imo. The problem is I think within each bullet you could make an argument. Interestingly enough though, 'height' is not on the list.
A Top 10 list of what NFL talent evaluators look for when figuring if a college passer has what it takes to succeed at the league's premier position. Info provided by Sports Illustrated May 1st, 2006 Issue :
Posted 15 February 2013 - 12:25 PM
Posted 15 February 2013 - 12:27 PM
Interesting...Luck had a 54% completion rate while Wilson had 64%, RG3 had 66% and Kaep had 62%.
Posted 15 February 2013 - 12:29 PM
It's okay you got him anyway.... because you are you... and he is, well... him.
Posted 15 February 2013 - 12:30 PM
I stole this from somewhere else but it's a good template to work from if you want to debate which young QB you're taking to start a team. This is in terms of college prospects but the fact that we know a little bit more about these guys only helps imo. The problem is I think within each bullet you could make an argument. Interestingly enough though, 'height' is not on the list.
A Top 10 list of what NFL talent evaluators look for when figuring if a college passer has what it takes to succeed at the league's premier position. Info provided by Sports Illustrated May 1st, 2006 Issue :
QUARTERBACK CHECKLIST
#6 TOUGHNESS : Packers GM Tom Wolf, whom traded for Brett Favre in 1992 and later drafted Matt Hasselbeck in the 6th round in 1998, figured out Favre when, 31 days after stomach surgery, Favre took the field and led his college team, Southern Mississippi, to victory..
The guy that wrote the Right Stuff and Bonfire of the Vanities was the GM of the Packers? When?
Posted 15 February 2013 - 12:33 PM
LOL, ya , I know, but felt we should have manuevered a bit to get him
Could you imagine the uproar on this board if we had traded up to draft a QB in the 3rd? Could you imagine trading up in consecutive rounds? This place would have exploded.
Shoot this man.
Why? Is he trying to sell us reasonably priced Uggs?
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users