Jump to content

  •  

Welcome to JetNation.com


Sign In  Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter

Create Account
Welcome to JetNation.com, your home for New York Jets talk. We are an independent site, which means we aren't affiliated with the NY Jets or SNY. The opinions here are never censored. We want you to join in on the conversation, but don't worry this is a simple and FREE process. Be apart of JetNation.com by signing in or creating an account. When you create an account, you can also opt to use your existing Facebook or Twitter login.
  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get email updates
  • Get your own profile page and make new friends
  • Send personal messages to other members.
Also be sure to check us out on Facebook and Twitter.
 
Guest Message by DevFuse

Photo
* * * - - 2 votes

A WR given to us in this Mock Draft, the Best in the draft though?


  • Please log in to reply
47 replies to this topic

#1 drocksthaparty

drocksthaparty

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 67 posts

Posted 23 March 2013 - 09:53 PM

What do you guys think? Could this really happen? It could be a good deal,  what do you guys think?

Who would you rather have at that pick, if you don't like it?

 

http://nfldraftzone....jordan-norcutt/


  • 0

#2 Il Mostro

Il Mostro

    Cazzone

  • Members
  • 4,846 posts
  • LocationOut West

Posted 23 March 2013 - 09:56 PM

I will lose what's left of my mind if we take him at 9.


  • 0
It's all fun and games until someone loses an eye. Then it's just fun.

#3 drocksthaparty

drocksthaparty

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 67 posts

Posted 23 March 2013 - 10:13 PM

To be honest, I believe he is over rated, I mean the white kid Rogers is a solid wide out, they had Da'Rick Rogers from Tennessee Tech, plus Justin Hunter.  I think Hunter is better than Patterson, Patterson is just more explosive when he gets the ball.  He is not that impressive though and his routes are horrible.


  • 0

#4 New York Mick

New York Mick

    Still Censored

  • Members
  • 8,794 posts

Posted 23 March 2013 - 10:32 PM

Could you just post the damn thing instead of the link. Some of us are driving a truck through New Mexico reading the site on their phone.
  • 1

#5 T0mShane

T0mShane

    Gluten for punishment

  • Members
  • 26,886 posts

Posted 23 March 2013 - 10:37 PM

At 1:19

 


  • 0
Well, that's the internet, man: 9 billion tough guys who secretly want to touch your pee-pee.

#6 JoeC36

JoeC36

    JetNation's Keeper Of The Anals

  • Moderators
  • 11,681 posts

Posted 23 March 2013 - 10:43 PM

What do you guys think? Could this really happen? It could be a good deal,  what do you guys think?
Who would you rather have at that pick, if you don't like it?
 
http://nfldraftzone....jordan-norcutt/


Going forward please post the entire story along with the link.

Thanks
  • 0

289 Time Post of the Week Loser


#7 j4jets

j4jets

    Numbers guy!

  • Members
  • 926 posts
  • LocationDallas, TX

Posted 24 March 2013 - 03:48 AM

Could you just post the damn thing instead of the link. Some of us are driving a truck through New Mexico reading the site on their phone.


Probably shouldn't be on the site while driving to begin with..
  • 0

#8 Maxman

Maxman

    Mr. Jet Nation

  • Administrators
  • 58,506 posts
  • LocationJN Server Room

Posted 24 March 2013 - 05:16 AM

Could you just post the damn thing instead of the link. Some of us are driving a truck through New Mexico reading the site on their phone.


Amen.
  • 0

The largest independent community of NY Jets fans on the web. Visit our blog, Facebook page and Twitter.


#9 New York Mick

New York Mick

    Still Censored

  • Members
  • 8,794 posts

Posted 24 March 2013 - 05:49 AM

Probably shouldn't be on the site while driving to begin with..


You ever drive through Arizona, New Mexico and Texas? It's boring as ****. Outside of the mountains it looks like a nuclear testing site.
  • 1

#10 Integrity28

Integrity28

    I love it when Idzik's plan comes together.

  • Members
  • 33,332 posts
  • Locationwrong guy in the wrong place at the wrong time

Posted 24 March 2013 - 06:39 AM

Could you just post the damn thing instead of the link. Some of us are driving a truck through New Mexico reading the site on their phone.

 

Be careful, for the sake of the people on the road around you. Pretty irresponsible, to be honest - my wife works from a national insurance provider, the data they have on phone usage while driving is comparable to drunk driving data.


  • 0

"Idz a process."

 

Posted Image


#11 Integrity28

Integrity28

    I love it when Idzik's plan comes together.

  • Members
  • 33,332 posts
  • Locationwrong guy in the wrong place at the wrong time

Posted 24 March 2013 - 06:43 AM

So in this draft, they have us taking Patterson over Warmack, Mingo, Lotulelei, Vaccaro, and both Trufant and Rhodes?

 

I dunno, those are all players I'd prefer taking over a WR. I'm content with Holmes, Kerley, Hill and some journeymen or a late-rounder at WR. Much prefer the idea of a low-miss-potential defender or OG.


  • 0

"Idz a process."

 

Posted Image


#12 New York Mick

New York Mick

    Still Censored

  • Members
  • 8,794 posts

Posted 24 March 2013 - 11:24 AM

Be careful, for the sake of the people on the road around you. Pretty irresponsible, to be honest - my wife works from a national insurance provider, the data they have on phone usage while driving is comparable to drunk driving data.


What am I going to hit mom tumble weed? There's not one building or person in site. It's not like I'm checking it in the city or going down a cliff.
  • 0

#13 Integrity28

Integrity28

    I love it when Idzik's plan comes together.

  • Members
  • 33,332 posts
  • Locationwrong guy in the wrong place at the wrong time

Posted 24 March 2013 - 11:34 AM

What am I going to hit mom tumble weed? There's not one building or person in site. It's not like I'm checking it in the city or going down a cliff.


Just saying be careful dude, defensiveness is a sign of knowing you're in the wrong.
  • 0

"Idz a process."

 

Posted Image


#14 BroadwayJoe12

BroadwayJoe12

    JN's Rust Cohle

  • Members
  • 8,477 posts

Posted 24 March 2013 - 01:15 PM

So in this draft, they have us taking Patterson over Warmack, Mingo, Lotulelei, Vaccaro, and both Trufant and Rhodes?

 

I dunno, those are all players I'd prefer taking over a WR. I'm content with Holmes, Kerley, Hill and some journeymen or a late-rounder at WR. Much prefer the idea of a low-miss-potential defender or OG.

 

 

Yea, I don't understand the selection either. Patterson is an absolute stud and provided we had our roster filled out, especially QB, he'd be a fine pick.  But we're not in the position to be selecting projects, who needs to work on refining routes and learning the nuances of the position...we already have one of those.


  • 0

#15 T0mShane

T0mShane

    Gluten for punishment

  • Members
  • 26,886 posts

Posted 24 March 2013 - 01:18 PM

Yea, I don't understand the selection either. Patterson is an absolute stud and provided we had our roster filled out, especially QB, he'd be a fine pick.  But we're not in the position to be selecting projects, who needs to work on refining routes and learning the nuances of the position...we already have one of those.

 

Then again, you bring in Patterson, give him a de facto redshirt season, then he's (and Hill is?) ready in 2014 when you find your qb.


  • 0
Well, that's the internet, man: 9 billion tough guys who secretly want to touch your pee-pee.

#16 Greenseed4

Greenseed4

    Eskimo Brother

  • Members
  • 4,007 posts

Posted 24 March 2013 - 02:06 PM

Patterson Schmatterson.  high risk.  high reward.  pass.


  • 0

#17 Gastineau Lives

Gastineau Lives

    JetNation Radio Has Been

  • Members
  • 3,919 posts

Posted 24 March 2013 - 02:09 PM

Patterson Schmatterson.  high risk.  high reward.  pass.

Are we talking like even money high risk or like 10-1 risk?


  • 0
"Those eight weeks I spent as co-host of JetNation Radio were among the happiest of my life. Oh, and F Tom Shane."

#18 SenorGato

SenorGato

    Schottenhomer

  • Members
  • 20,319 posts

Posted 24 March 2013 - 02:27 PM

Patterson Schmatterson. high risk. high reward. pass.


Yeah I want nothing to do with Patterson. Body catcher extraordinaire.
  • 0

We sick an' tired of-a your ism-skism game. Dyin' 'n' goin' to heaven in-a Jesus' name, Lord. We know when we understand:

Almighty God is a living man. - Bob Marley "Get up Stand up"


#19 T0mShane

T0mShane

    Gluten for punishment

  • Members
  • 26,886 posts

Posted 24 March 2013 - 02:38 PM

Body catcher extraordinaire.



Who isn't?
  • 0
Well, that's the internet, man: 9 billion tough guys who secretly want to touch your pee-pee.

#20 Gastineau Lives

Gastineau Lives

    JetNation Radio Has Been

  • Members
  • 3,919 posts

Posted 24 March 2013 - 03:03 PM

Yeah I want nothing to do with Patterson. Body catcher extraordinaire.

 
Tennessee WR Cordarrelle Patterson dropped just 4.2 percent of his intended targets in 2012.
The drop rate compares favorably to Keenan Allen (4.7 percent), Terrance
Williams (5.8 percent), and especially Vols teammate Justin Hunter (12.1
percent). Although draftniks have nitpicked Patterson's tendency to
"body catch" as opposed to secure passes with his hands, his efficiency
wasn't an issue in college.

Edited by Gastineau Lives, 24 March 2013 - 03:03 PM.

  • 0
"Those eight weeks I spent as co-host of JetNation Radio were among the happiest of my life. Oh, and F Tom Shane."

#21 BroadwayJoe12

BroadwayJoe12

    JN's Rust Cohle

  • Members
  • 8,477 posts

Posted 24 March 2013 - 03:04 PM

Then again, you bring in Patterson, give him a de facto redshirt season, then he's (and Hill is?) ready in 2014 when you find your qb.

 

If we're going to go that route, I just assume get Austin as Patterson is too similar to Hill.  Not that there's anything wrong with having two similar receivers, I just think TA could help us win games quicker regardless of our QB situation.   **For the record, we knew Hill, as a second rounder, was going to be raw as hell and there's a whole contingent here ready to cut bait after one season.

 

I watch a lot of college football, but by no means am I a scout.  But i'm drinking the koolaide on drafting Geno if he's there with our 9th and provided we get the 13th overall to surround him with someone like Austin and then Ertz/Effert in the second.  I saw enough of Smith in college to go on record now saying that if you can surround him with a Hill, Austin, Kerley, Cumberland, Ertz/Effert and Powell/Goodson out of the backfield, he'll put up better numbers in his rookie year than anything Sanchez has ever done.


  • 0

#22 SenorGato

SenorGato

    Schottenhomer

  • Members
  • 20,319 posts

Posted 24 March 2013 - 03:09 PM

Who isn't?


The best ones and majority of the good ones.
  • 0

We sick an' tired of-a your ism-skism game. Dyin' 'n' goin' to heaven in-a Jesus' name, Lord. We know when we understand:

Almighty God is a living man. - Bob Marley "Get up Stand up"


#23 SenorGato

SenorGato

    Schottenhomer

  • Members
  • 20,319 posts

Posted 24 March 2013 - 03:12 PM

None of those guys are top ten picks. Body catching can be efficient statistically, you're using the whole body instead of "just" the hands.

Edited by SenorGato, 24 March 2013 - 03:17 PM.

  • 0

We sick an' tired of-a your ism-skism game. Dyin' 'n' goin' to heaven in-a Jesus' name, Lord. We know when we understand:

Almighty God is a living man. - Bob Marley "Get up Stand up"


#24 T0mShane

T0mShane

    Gluten for punishment

  • Members
  • 26,886 posts

Posted 24 March 2013 - 03:13 PM

If we're going to go that route, I just assume get Austin as Patterson is too similar to Hill. Not that there's anything wrong with having two similar receivers, I just think TA could help us win games quicker regardless of our QB situation. **For the record, we knew Hill, as a second rounder, was going to be raw as hell and there's a whole contingent here ready to cut bait after one season.

I watch a lot of college football, but by no means am I a scout. But i'm drinking the koolaide on drafting Geno if he's there with our 9th and provided we get the 13th overall to surround him with someone like Austin and then Ertz/Effert in the second. I saw enough of Smith in college to go on record now saying that if you can surround him with a Hill, Austin, Kerley, Cumberland, Ertz/Effert and Powell/Goodson out of the backfield, he'll put up better numbers in his rookie year than anything Sanchez has ever done.



Agreed on all counts, though I won't be heartbroken if they took Patterson over Austin right now, even though I like Austin better. I think you're choosing between a guy who might be Dez Bryant vs a guy who might be Desean Jackson.


I think Geno Smith will be fine, personally, if he's handled correctly. He does all the good things you want, and his bad things aren't all that bad. Sanchez has cognitive difficulties--he doesn't process. I don't really see that with Geno Smith.
  • 0
Well, that's the internet, man: 9 billion tough guys who secretly want to touch your pee-pee.

#25 T0mShane

T0mShane

    Gluten for punishment

  • Members
  • 26,886 posts

Posted 24 March 2013 - 03:15 PM

The best ones and majority of the good ones.


They catch every pass with their hands? Cruz and Nicks are body catchers. They get along just fine. It's a nitpick.
  • 0
Well, that's the internet, man: 9 billion tough guys who secretly want to touch your pee-pee.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users