Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

A WR given to us in this Mock Draft, the Best in the draft though?


48 posts in this topic

Posted · Report post

I will lose what's left of my mind if we take him at 9.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

To be honest, I believe he is over rated, I mean the white kid Rogers is a solid wide out, they had Da'Rick Rogers from Tennessee Tech, plus Justin Hunter.  I think Hunter is better than Patterson, Patterson is just more explosive when he gets the ball.  He is not that impressive though and his routes are horrible.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Could you just post the damn thing instead of the link. Some of us are driving a truck through New Mexico reading the site on their phone.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

What do you guys think? Could this really happen? It could be a good deal,  what do you guys think?

Who would you rather have at that pick, if you don't like it?

 

http://nfldraftzone.com/mock-drafts/nfldraftzone-writers-first-half-mock-draft-1-0-w-jordan-norcutt/

Going forward please post the entire story along with the link.

Thanks

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Could you just post the damn thing instead of the link. Some of us are driving a truck through New Mexico reading the site on their phone.

Probably shouldn't be on the site while driving to begin with..

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Could you just post the damn thing instead of the link. Some of us are driving a truck through New Mexico reading the site on their phone.

Amen.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Probably shouldn't be on the site while driving to begin with..

You ever drive through Arizona, New Mexico and Texas? It's boring as ****. Outside of the mountains it looks like a nuclear testing site.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Could you just post the damn thing instead of the link. Some of us are driving a truck through New Mexico reading the site on their phone.

 

Be careful, for the sake of the people on the road around you. Pretty irresponsible, to be honest - my wife works from a national insurance provider, the data they have on phone usage while driving is comparable to drunk driving data.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

So in this draft, they have us taking Patterson over Warmack, Mingo, Lotulelei, Vaccaro, and both Trufant and Rhodes?

 

I dunno, those are all players I'd prefer taking over a WR. I'm content with Holmes, Kerley, Hill and some journeymen or a late-rounder at WR. Much prefer the idea of a low-miss-potential defender or OG.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Be careful, for the sake of the people on the road around you. Pretty irresponsible, to be honest - my wife works from a national insurance provider, the data they have on phone usage while driving is comparable to drunk driving data.

What am I going to hit mom tumble weed? There's not one building or person in site. It's not like I'm checking it in the city or going down a cliff.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

What am I going to hit mom tumble weed? There's not one building or person in site. It's not like I'm checking it in the city or going down a cliff.

Just saying be careful dude, defensiveness is a sign of knowing you're in the wrong.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

So in this draft, they have us taking Patterson over Warmack, Mingo, Lotulelei, Vaccaro, and both Trufant and Rhodes?

 

I dunno, those are all players I'd prefer taking over a WR. I'm content with Holmes, Kerley, Hill and some journeymen or a late-rounder at WR. Much prefer the idea of a low-miss-potential defender or OG.

 

 

Yea, I don't understand the selection either. Patterson is an absolute stud and provided we had our roster filled out, especially QB, he'd be a fine pick.  But we're not in the position to be selecting projects, who needs to work on refining routes and learning the nuances of the position...we already have one of those.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Yea, I don't understand the selection either. Patterson is an absolute stud and provided we had our roster filled out, especially QB, he'd be a fine pick.  But we're not in the position to be selecting projects, who needs to work on refining routes and learning the nuances of the position...we already have one of those.

 

Then again, you bring in Patterson, give him a de facto redshirt season, then he's (and Hill is?) ready in 2014 when you find your qb.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Patterson Schmatterson.  high risk.  high reward.  pass.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Patterson Schmatterson.  high risk.  high reward.  pass.

Are we talking like even money high risk or like 10-1 risk?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Patterson Schmatterson. high risk. high reward. pass.

Yeah I want nothing to do with Patterson. Body catcher extraordinaire.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Body catcher extraordinaire.

Who isn't?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited) · Report post

Yeah I want nothing to do with Patterson. Body catcher extraordinaire.

 
Tennessee WR Cordarrelle Patterson dropped just 4.2 percent of his intended targets in 2012.
The drop rate compares favorably to Keenan Allen (4.7 percent), Terrance

Williams (5.8 percent), and especially Vols teammate Justin Hunter (12.1

percent). Although draftniks have nitpicked Patterson's tendency to

"body catch" as opposed to secure passes with his hands, his efficiency

wasn't an issue in college.

Edited by Gastineau Lives
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Then again, you bring in Patterson, give him a de facto redshirt season, then he's (and Hill is?) ready in 2014 when you find your qb.

 

If we're going to go that route, I just assume get Austin as Patterson is too similar to Hill.  Not that there's anything wrong with having two similar receivers, I just think TA could help us win games quicker regardless of our QB situation.   **For the record, we knew Hill, as a second rounder, was going to be raw as hell and there's a whole contingent here ready to cut bait after one season.

 

I watch a lot of college football, but by no means am I a scout.  But i'm drinking the koolaide on drafting Geno if he's there with our 9th and provided we get the 13th overall to surround him with someone like Austin and then Ertz/Effert in the second.  I saw enough of Smith in college to go on record now saying that if you can surround him with a Hill, Austin, Kerley, Cumberland, Ertz/Effert and Powell/Goodson out of the backfield, he'll put up better numbers in his rookie year than anything Sanchez has ever done.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Who isn't?

The best ones and majority of the good ones.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited) · Report post

None of those guys are top ten picks. Body catching can be efficient statistically, you're using the whole body instead of "just" the hands.

Edited by SenorGato
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

If we're going to go that route, I just assume get Austin as Patterson is too similar to Hill. Not that there's anything wrong with having two similar receivers, I just think TA could help us win games quicker regardless of our QB situation. **For the record, we knew Hill, as a second rounder, was going to be raw as hell and there's a whole contingent here ready to cut bait after one season.

I watch a lot of college football, but by no means am I a scout. But i'm drinking the koolaide on drafting Geno if he's there with our 9th and provided we get the 13th overall to surround him with someone like Austin and then Ertz/Effert in the second. I saw enough of Smith in college to go on record now saying that if you can surround him with a Hill, Austin, Kerley, Cumberland, Ertz/Effert and Powell/Goodson out of the backfield, he'll put up better numbers in his rookie year than anything Sanchez has ever done.

Agreed on all counts, though I won't be heartbroken if they took Patterson over Austin right now, even though I like Austin better. I think you're choosing between a guy who might be Dez Bryant vs a guy who might be Desean Jackson.

I think Geno Smith will be fine, personally, if he's handled correctly. He does all the good things you want, and his bad things aren't all that bad. Sanchez has cognitive difficulties--he doesn't process. I don't really see that with Geno Smith.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

The best ones and majority of the good ones.

They catch every pass with their hands? Cruz and Nicks are body catchers. They get along just fine. It's a nitpick.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.