Jump to content

  •  

Welcome to JetNation.com


Sign In  Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter

Create Account
Welcome to JetNation.com, your home for New York Jets talk. We are an independent site, which means we aren't affiliated with the NY Jets or SNY. The opinions here are never censored. We want you to join in on the conversation, but don't worry this is a simple and FREE process. Be apart of JetNation.com by signing in or creating an account. When you create an account, you can also opt to use your existing Facebook or Twitter login.
  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get email updates
  • Get your own profile page and make new friends
  • Send personal messages to other members.
Also be sure to check us out on Facebook and Twitter.
 
Guest Message by DevFuse

Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

will the Jets keep 4 QB's going into week 1 or will Garrard or Mcelboy be dropped?


  • Please log in to reply
90 replies to this topic

#1 Blackout

Blackout

    Circle Of Bosses

  • Members
  • 33,135 posts
  • Locationhome

Posted 06 May 2013 - 09:37 PM

I think we might as well hang on to all 4 just incase

 

 

with this crappy team we'll need as many healthy QB's as can be


  • 0
Blackout, on 16 Oct 2014 - 10:28 PM, said: i HATE saying this but CJ2k is now CJ 0.5K at this point

#2 kelticwizard

kelticwizard

    2nd Year Veteran

  • Members
  • 3,452 posts
  • LocationSoutheastern Connecticut

Posted 06 May 2013 - 09:46 PM

Dunno, we'll have to take it as it goes.

 

Didn't we have 5 QB's on the roster under Mangini at some point?  Kliff Kingsbury was one of them I think.  It was a strange scenario as I recall.


  • 0

#3 Blackout

Blackout

    Circle Of Bosses

  • Members
  • 33,135 posts
  • Locationhome

Posted 06 May 2013 - 09:48 PM

Dunno, we'll have to take it as it goes.

 

Didn't we have 5 QB's on the roster under Mangini at some point?  Kliff Kingsbury was one of them I think.  It was a strange scenario as I recall.

 

i was hoping to never remember the Jets had a guy named "Kliff" on our roster at some point in my lifetime :D


  • 0
Blackout, on 16 Oct 2014 - 10:28 PM, said: i HATE saying this but CJ2k is now CJ 0.5K at this point

#4 pointman

pointman

    sandwiches are good.

  • Members
  • 6,579 posts

Posted 06 May 2013 - 10:00 PM

Drop Garrard if you won't drop Sanchez.


  • 0

#5 JET80TV

JET80TV

    Practice Squad Player

  • Members
  • 113 posts
  • LocationUpstate NY

Posted 06 May 2013 - 10:11 PM

why would they drop Garrard over Sims?
  • 1

#6 jetsjetsjetss

jetsjetsjetss

    3rd Year Veteran

  • Members
  • 2,666 posts

Posted 06 May 2013 - 10:14 PM

if garrard gets hurt and is unable to play the rest of the year drop him

 

if not mcelroy and sims are prime canadites


  • 0

#7 stugotz81

stugotz81

    2nd Year Veteran

  • Members
  • 1,294 posts

Posted 06 May 2013 - 10:15 PM

Sims and McElroy are as good as a fart in the wind come week 1.


  • 2
You can’t fly with eagles when you keep walking with turkeys

#8 stoicsentry

stoicsentry

    Not Really Stoic

  • Writers \ Bloggers
  • 8,870 posts

Posted 06 May 2013 - 10:25 PM

Um... 1 goes to the practice squad, 1 gets cut. Pretty straightforward. Not sure if they could move 2 to the PS, in case Garrard gets hurt and you have to call up McElroy or Simms to be your 3rd string.


  • 0

#9 Obrien2Toon

Obrien2Toon

    Harbaugh or Bevell please!!!

  • Members
  • 1,388 posts

Posted 06 May 2013 - 10:46 PM

Week 1 should be

1-Sanchez
2-Geno
3-McElroy

Garrard has always been a bum and now hasn't played in 2 years.
Simms has to be listed on roster as favor to father, I don't even count him.
  • 0

#10 jgb

jgb

    Darksider

  • Members
  • 4,453 posts

Posted 06 May 2013 - 11:00 PM

McElroy stinks and is worst of the bunch
  • 0

#11 JoeKlecko

JoeKlecko

    2nd Year Veteran

  • Members
  • 1,800 posts
  • LocationHigh Point, NC

Posted 06 May 2013 - 11:09 PM

I think we might as well hang on to all 4 just incase

 

 

with this crappy team we'll need as many healthy QB's as can be

 

Why would Garrard or McElroy be the one dropped?  That makes no sense to me.  If anyone is dropped, it would be Simms.  Beyond him, if any QB is dropped, it ought to be Sanchez imo.


  • 0
Rex Ryan, the bag lady of NFL HCs.

#12 New York Mick

New York Mick

    Still Censored

  • Members
  • 9,007 posts

Posted 07 May 2013 - 12:15 AM

Can we drop Sanchez and smith?
  • 0

#13 slats

slats

    9 5/8" hands

  • Moderators
  • 19,637 posts
  • LocationAcross the Universe

Posted 07 May 2013 - 06:08 AM

The only QB whose job is completely safe in 2013 is Geno Smith.

I think the safe guess is Smith, Sanchez, and Garrard as the QBs on opening day, but a lot can happen between now and then. If Garrard is horrible, or gets hurt, he's gone. If Garrard and Smith are both playing well enough to merit starting, the team could look to cut ties with Sanchez. So McElroy's left to hope that Garrard is either great or terrible/injured, because otherwise he's pretty much out of a job.

If the fans are as brutal to Sanchez in the preseason as I believe they're capable of being, I really think he could be gone. It would be such a relief for the fan base.
  • 0
back in my room
wish you were dead
you bawl like the baby
in Eraserhead

#14 GandWFan

GandWFan

    Practice Squad Player

  • Members
  • 361 posts

Posted 07 May 2013 - 06:32 AM

Nope.  We are dropping Buttchez and Simms.  Garrard starts, Smith, then McElroy.


  • 0

#15 Irish Jet

Irish Jet

    .

  • Members
  • 23,693 posts

Posted 07 May 2013 - 07:08 AM

There are only 3 viable starters - Geno, Sanchez and Garrard. I'd be shocked if they weren't the 3 there on opening day.

 

Garrard could easily be gone if he's terrible, hasn't played in a long time and he may just be finished, he has to prove he can play. Looks decreasingly like were cutting Sanchez lose, sadly, which in fact, makes him the favourite to start.


  • 0

#16 GandWFan

GandWFan

    Practice Squad Player

  • Members
  • 361 posts

Posted 07 May 2013 - 07:16 AM

There are only 3 viable starters - Geno, Sanchez and Garrard. I'd be shocked if they weren't the 3 there on opening day.

 

Garrard could easily be gone if he's terrible, hasn't played in a long time and he may just be finished, he has to prove he can play. Looks decreasingly like were cutting Sanchez lose, sadly, which in fact, makes him the favourite to start.

 

52 turnovers in 2 years says Sanchez is not a viable starter.  That leaves only 2.


  • 0

#17 Irish Jet

Irish Jet

    .

  • Members
  • 23,693 posts

Posted 07 May 2013 - 07:21 AM

52 turnovers in 2 years says Sanchez is not a viable starter.  That leaves only 2.

 

$17 Million says he is. Which puts it back to 3.


  • 0

#18 Jacked4JetsFB

Jacked4JetsFB

    YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!

  • Banned
  • 1,160 posts
  • LocationA land far, far away

Posted 07 May 2013 - 07:27 AM

I think we might as well hang on to all 4 just incase

 

 

with this crappy team we'll need as many healthy QB's as can be

 

Garrard, Smith and Mcelroy or Simms will be the only 3 on the roster for the start of the season. Bank.


  • 0

#19 HessStation

HessStation

    FightThePower

  • Members
  • 24,063 posts

Posted 07 May 2013 - 07:36 AM

Is it just me with the thinking of, WTF is wrong with everyone considering Matt Simms as an actual qB option?
  • 2

#20 flgreen

flgreen

    3rd Year Veteran

  • Members
  • 17,184 posts

Posted 07 May 2013 - 07:37 AM

Sanchez/Garrard>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Smith


  • 0

#21 Jacked4JetsFB

Jacked4JetsFB

    YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!

  • Banned
  • 1,160 posts
  • LocationA land far, far away

Posted 07 May 2013 - 07:38 AM

Is it just me with the thinking of, WTF is wrong with everyone considering Matt Simms as an actual qB option?

 

I feel the same way when I hear Mark Sanchez as an actual qB option.


  • 0

#22 Jacked4JetsFB

Jacked4JetsFB

    YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!

  • Banned
  • 1,160 posts
  • LocationA land far, far away

Posted 07 May 2013 - 07:39 AM

Sanchez/Garrard>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Smith

 

R U HIGH?

 

Garrard, MAYBE, Sanchez, my 4 year old is better than Sanchez


  • 0

#23 flgreen

flgreen

    3rd Year Veteran

  • Members
  • 17,184 posts

Posted 07 May 2013 - 07:46 AM

R U HIGH?

 

Garrard, MAYBE, Sanchez, my 4 year old is better than Sanchez

To early

 

 

Well, if that's true get the kid an agent.  

 

Sanchez had the year from hell last year.  Other then that he's been a middeling NFL QB


  • 0

#24 jbone

jbone

    Practice Squad Player

  • Members
  • 435 posts

Posted 07 May 2013 - 07:48 AM

Is it just me with the thinking of, WTF is wrong with everyone considering Matt Simms as an actual qB option?

Simms is awful. There's no reason he should still be on the team. None. 


  • 0

#25 Bleedin Green

Bleedin Green

    SuperTwat

  • Members
  • 21,488 posts

Posted 07 May 2013 - 08:55 AM

The only thing McElroy and Simms are going to be competing for is a spot on the practice squad.  Other than that, they'll need either an injury to one of the other QBs or some desperate team being willing to cough up something (anything) for Sanchez, in which case McElroy moves into the #3 spot and Simms to the PS.


  • 0
By day he's the (not so) mild-mannered Bleedin Green, but by night...

TL;DR




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users