Jump to content

  •  

Welcome to JetNation.com


Sign In  Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter

Create Account
Welcome to JetNation.com, your home for New York Jets talk. We are an independent site, which means we aren't affiliated with the NY Jets or SNY. The opinions here are never censored. We want you to join in on the conversation, but don't worry this is a simple and FREE process. Be apart of JetNation.com by signing in or creating an account. When you create an account, you can also opt to use your existing Facebook or Twitter login.
  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get email updates
  • Get your own profile page and make new friends
  • Send personal messages to other members.
Also be sure to check us out on Facebook and Twitter.
 
Guest Message by DevFuse

Photo
- - - - -

I am not so sure about Santonio Holmes!


  • Please log in to reply
31 replies to this topic

#26 CrazyCarl40

CrazyCarl40

    3rd Year Veteran

  • Members
  • 11,382 posts

Posted 10 May 2013 - 08:50 AM

That would be a shame considering he's the best player on the team.

 

There is a difference between best and most talented. Holmes may be the latter but he is certainly not the former.


  • 0

#27 The Crusher

The Crusher

    More Please!!!

  • Moderators
  • 29,534 posts

Posted 10 May 2013 - 09:55 AM

or how he had never fumbled since High School before coming to the Jets

 

 

GTFO!!!  Really?


  • 0

#28 Bleedin Green

Bleedin Green

    SuperTwat

  • Members
  • 21,139 posts

Posted 10 May 2013 - 09:55 AM

They got to pay him anyhow.  If he can't play IR

 

This.  There's no benefit to be had from cutting him.  If anything, he'll start the season off on the PUP list if his foot is still an issue.  At this point I'd bet Idzik is probably hoping for a decent enough season out of him to generate some possible trade interest next year.


  • 0
By day he's the (not so) mild-mannered Bleedin Green, but by night...

TL;DR

#29 Bleedin Green

Bleedin Green

    SuperTwat

  • Members
  • 21,139 posts

Posted 10 May 2013 - 09:58 AM

Sorry can not help to think Steeelers are still laughing at us right now

 

Meh, I still think that trade was a great move for the Jets.  The Steelers didn't pull off any great move by sending him to the Jets other than trying to make themselves look like good people while still keeping around their rapist QB.  The real problem was that the Jets were the horses asses who handed Holmes that huge contract a year later.


  • 2
By day he's the (not so) mild-mannered Bleedin Green, but by night...

TL;DR

#30 Jetsfan80

Jetsfan80

    Hall Of Famer

  • Members
  • 46,570 posts

Posted 10 May 2013 - 10:12 AM

Meh, I still think that trade was a great move for the Jets.  The Steelers didn't pull off any great move by sending him to the Jets other than trying to make themselves look like good people while still keeping around their rapist QB.  The real problem was that the Jets were the horses asses who handed Holmes that huge contract a year later.

 

Exactly.  You make that deal for a 5th every time.  If we had decided to let him go after the 1-year rental, we probably end up with at LEAST a 5th round compensatory pick, maybe even a 4th. 

 

Unless he was an RFA that is, not sure.


Edited by Jetsfan80, 10 May 2013 - 10:12 AM.

  • 0

sheesh, I'm a doosh.


#31 The Crusher

The Crusher

    More Please!!!

  • Moderators
  • 29,534 posts

Posted 10 May 2013 - 10:19 AM

Meh, I still think that trade was a great move for the Jets.  The Steelers didn't pull off any great move by sending him to the Jets other than trying to make themselves look like good people while still keeping around their rapist QB.  The real problem was that the Jets were the horses asses who handed Holmes that huge contract a year later.

 

 

Comparatively anorexic for you, but spot on.  


  • 0

#32 JADEDGREEN

JADEDGREEN

    Annoying

  • Banned
  • 2,160 posts
  • LocationFree

Posted 10 May 2013 - 10:37 AM

Holmes is a born leader, a true captain in the Rex army!


  • 0





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users