Jump to content

  •  

Photo
- - - - -

So, the Vegas O/U for Jets wins in 2013 is 7


  • Please log in to reply
24 replies to this topic

#1 T0mShane

T0mShane

    From devil to Bevell, '15

  • Members
  • 25,748 posts

Posted 10 May 2013 - 03:57 PM

Pats: 11.5

The Dolphins: 7.5

The Bills: 5

 

Other notables:

 

Panthers, Eagles, Bucs: 6.5

Giants: 9

Broncos: 12

 

First wave of 2013 NFL win totals hit the board

nfpost-logo_023517.gifBy Joe Fortenbaugh | National Football Post – 11 hours ago
 

 


    Last Friday evening we were alerted to the fact that it is now possible to wager
on any 2013 NFL game that takes place from Week 1 through Week 16. One
week after the appetizers were brought out to our table, the main course
has arrived.



    On Thursday, the Atlantis sports book in Reno, Nevada became the first
shop in the business to post NFL season win totals for the 2013 season.
We’ll be diving into these numbers more thoroughly in the coming months,
but for now, here’s the complete list along with a few of our early
leans. Below you’ll notice the 2013 totals posted by the Atlantis, along
with the 2012 opening season win totals listed by Cantor Gaming in Las
Vegas for a comparison.



    EARLY LEANS



    OVER New Orleans Saints 9.5 (-115):
The Saints won 11 or more games in each season under head coach Sean
Payton from 2009-2011 before posting a pedestrian 7-9 campaign in 2012.
Payton’s back from suspension this season while Rob Ryan should find
some success overhauling one of the worst defensive units in NFL
history. Oh yeah, and Drew Brees is once again under center for the Who
Dats.



    UNDER New York Jets 7 (-110):
They’re a mess and need to go 8-8 for this bet to lose. I’m going to
use the money from this winning ticket to fund my next golf trip to
Bandon Dunes.



    OVER Carolina Panthers 6.5 (-130):
Last year’s 7-9 campaign was considered by many to be a big
disappointment, but keep in mind that Cam Newton and company closed the
show by winning five of their final six games.



    Big thanks to our good friend David Purdum of The Sporting News for the heads up on these totals.



    DENVER BRONCOS



2013 Total: 12 (Over: -130, Under: even)
2012 Total: 9.5 (Over: -110, Under: -120)
2012 Record: 13-3



    GREEN BAY PACKERS



2013 Total: 12 (Over: -115, Under: -115)
2012 Total: 12 (Over: -125, Under: -105)
2012 Record: 11-5



    NEW ENGLAND PATRIOTS



2013 Total: 11.5 (Over: -140, Under: +110)
2012 Total: 12 (Over: -120, Under: -110)
2012 Record: 12-4



    SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS



2013 Total: 11.5 (Over: -120, Under: -110)
2012 Total: 10 (Over: +105, Under: -135)
2012 Record: 11-4-1



    HOUSTON TEXANS



2013 Total: 11 (Over: -140, Under: +110)
2012 Total: 10 (Over: -140, Under: +110)
2012 Record: 12-4



    SEATTLE SEAHAWKS



2013 Total: 11 (Over: -140, Under: +110)
2012 Total: 7 (Over: -110, Under: -120)
2012 Record: 11-5



    ATLANTA FALCONS



2013 Total: 10 (Over: -135, Under: +105)
2012 Total: 9 (Over: +105, Under: -135)
2012 Record: 13-3



    PITTSBURGH STEELERS



2013 Total: 10 (Over: -130, Under: even)
2012 Total: 10 (Over: -125, Under: -105)
2012 Record: 8-8



    BALTIMORE RAVENS



2013 Total: 9.5 (Over: -120, Under: -110)
2012 Total: 10 (Over: -110, Under: -120)
2012 Record: 10-6



    NEW ORLEANS SAINTS



2013 Total: 9.5 (Over: -115, Under: -115)
2012 Total: 10 (Over: -125, Under: -105)
2012 Record: 7-9



    CINCINNATI BENGALS



2013 Total: 9 (Over: -115, Under: -115)
2012 Total: 7.5 (Over: -130, Under: even)
2012 Record: 10-6



    NEW YORK GIANTS



2013 Total: 9 (Over: -120, Under: -110)
2012 Total: 9.5 (Over: -110, Under: -120)
2012 Record: 9-7



    WASHINGTON REDSKINS



2013 Total: 9 (Over: -110, Under: -120)
2012 Total: 6.5 (Over: even, Under: -130)
2012 Record: 10-6



    CHICAGO BEARS



2013 Total: 8.5 (Over: -145, Under: +115)
2012 Total: 8.5 (Over: -135, Under: +105)
2012 Record: 10-6



    DALLAS COWBOYS



2013 Total: 8.5 (Over: -150, Under: +120)
2012 Total: 8.5 (Over: -125, Under: -105)
2012 Record: 8-8



    INDIANAPOLIS COLTS



2013 Total: 8 (Over: -150, Under: +120)
2012 Total: 5.5 (Over: +105, Under: -135)
2012 Record: 11-5



    ST. LOUIS RAMS



2013 Total: 8 (Over: -115, Under: -115)
2012 Total: 6 (Over: -110, Under: -120)
2012 Record: 7-8-1



    MIAMI DOLPHINS



2013 Total: 7.5 (Over: -115, Under: -115)
2012 Total: 7.5 (Over: -110, Under: -120)
2012 Record: 7-9



    MINNESOTA VIKINGS



2013 Total: 7.5 (Over: -115, Under: -115)
2012 Total: 6 (Over: even, Under: -130)
2012 Record: 10-6



    DETROIT LIONS



2013 Total: 7 (Over: -115, Under: -115)
2012 Total: 9.5 (Over: +105, Under: -135)
2012 Record: 4-12



    NEW YORK JETS



2013 Total: 7 (Over: -120, Under: -110)
2012 Total: 8.5 (Over: -115, Under: -115)
2012 Record: 6-10



    SAN DIEGO CHARGERS



2013 Total: 7 (Over: even, Under: -130)
2012 Total: 9 (Over: -130, Under: even)
2012 Record: 7-9



    CAROLINA PANTHERS



2013 Total: 6.5 (Over: -130, Under: even)
2012 Total: 7.5 (Over: -115, Under: -115)
2012 Record: 7-9



    KANSAS CITY CHIEFS



2013 Total: 6.5 (Over: -130, Under: even)
2012 Total: 8 (Over: -120, Under: -110)
2012 Record: 2-14



PHILADELPHIA EAGLES



2013 Total: 6.5 (Over: -150, Under: +120)
2012 Total: 10 (Over: -135, Under: +105)
2012 Record: 4-12



TAMPA BAY BUCCANEERS



2013 Total: 6.5 (Over: -115, Under: -115)
2012 Total: 6 (Over: -110, Under: -120)
2012 Record: 7-9


 

TENNESSEE TITANS



2013 Total: 6.5 (Over: +110, Under: -140)
2012 Total: 7 (Over: -130, Under: even)
2012 Record: 6-10


 

ARIZONA CARDINALS



2013 Total: 6 (Over: -110, Under: -120)
2012 Total: 7 (Over: -110, Under: -120)
2012 Record: 5-11


 

OAKLAND RAIDERS



2013 Total: 5.5 (Over: -115, Under: -115)
2012 Total: 7 (Over: -110, Under: -120)
2012 Record: 4-12


 

BUFFALO BILLS



2013 Total: 5 (Over: -135, Under: +105)
2012 Total: 7 (Over: -110, Under: -120)
2012 Record: 6-10


 

CLEVELAND BROWNS



2013 Total: 5 (Over: +120, Under: -150)
2012 Total: 5.5 (Over: even, Under: -130)
2012 Record: 5-11


 

JACKSONVILLE JAGUARS



2013 Total: 4.5 (Over: -140, Under: +110)
2012 Total: 5.5 (Over: +105, Under: -135)
2012 Record: 2-14


  • 0
Well, that's the internet, man: 9 billion tough guys who secretly want to touch your pee-pee.

#2 SenorGato

SenorGato

    Schottenhomer

  • Members
  • 20,075 posts

Posted 10 May 2013 - 04:10 PM

Too many. That will cost them the chance to draft an underclassmen QB in the top 5.
  • 1

We sick an' tired of-a your ism-skism game. Dyin' 'n' goin' to heaven in-a Jesus' name, Lord. We know when we understand:

Almighty God is a living man. - Bob Marley "Get up Stand up"


#3 JoeC36

JoeC36

    JetNation's Keeper Of The Anals

  • Moderators
  • 11,195 posts

Posted 10 May 2013 - 04:11 PM

take the under


  • 0

289 Time Post of the Week Loser


#4 flgreen

flgreen

    3rd Year Veteran

  • Members
  • 16,607 posts

Posted 10 May 2013 - 04:23 PM

Over

 

9 wins


  • 0

#5 faba

faba

    Moderator

  • Moderators
  • 25,091 posts
  • LocationHolmdel

Posted 10 May 2013 - 04:28 PM

Look at the bright side that can get them second place in the division


  • 0
Treat people with how you want to be treated-with respect.

#6 jack48

jack48

    2nd Year Veteran

  • Members
  • 4,240 posts

Posted 10 May 2013 - 05:40 PM

that is because the pundits are boobs and always have been.  vegas does not lose money on this stuff.


  • 1

#7 dbatesman

dbatesman

    FUGGER

  • Members
  • 8,178 posts

Posted 10 May 2013 - 05:41 PM

YOU JUST MADE THE BULLETIN BOARD, JOE FORTENBAUGH #swaggerliciousness


  • 0

This is like having a cat with leukemia.


#8 jack48

jack48

    2nd Year Veteran

  • Members
  • 4,240 posts

Posted 10 May 2013 - 05:42 PM

also love their read on TB


  • 0

#9 HessStation

HessStation

    FightThePower

  • Members
  • 23,684 posts

Posted 10 May 2013 - 05:56 PM

I'd put $500 down on the Pats under.

Edited by HessStation, 10 May 2013 - 05:56 PM.

  • 0

#10 T0mShane

T0mShane

    From devil to Bevell, '15

  • Members
  • 25,748 posts

Posted 10 May 2013 - 05:59 PM

I'd put $500 down on the Pats under.



They've probably got five division wins guaranteed before they take a snap this year. Dicey bet. Same reason Broncos are at 12.
  • 0
Well, that's the internet, man: 9 billion tough guys who secretly want to touch your pee-pee.

#11 HessStation

HessStation

    FightThePower

  • Members
  • 23,684 posts

Posted 10 May 2013 - 06:11 PM


They've probably got five division wins guaranteed before they take a snap this year. Dicey bet. Same reason Broncos are at 12.

im thinking 10 wins. The .5 gives me a lot of confidence. I don't think they've really improved themselves much with Brady another year older. I'm gonna bank on Gronk and Amendola missing sone key games and not resigning Welker coming back to bite. Out of all the teAms I think i like this bet the best.
  • 0

#12 SayNoToDMC

SayNoToDMC

    In search of terminally ill online girlfriend

  • Members
  • 6,508 posts

Posted 10 May 2013 - 06:14 PM

I'll take that under for sure


  • 0

28ad228d-4df6-4b64-b890-b5246112bd82.jpg


#13 stoicsentry

stoicsentry

    Not Really Stoic

  • Writers \ Bloggers
  • 8,355 posts

Posted 10 May 2013 - 08:40 PM

Worst team in the league = over/under 7 wins?


  • 0

#14 Gastineau Lives

Gastineau Lives

    Future Internet Broadcasting Hall of Fame Inductee

  • Members
  • 3,762 posts

Posted 10 May 2013 - 08:54 PM

also love their read on TB

That number is low.


  • 0

#15 CrazyCarl40

CrazyCarl40

    3rd Year Veteran

  • Members
  • 11,267 posts

Posted 10 May 2013 - 09:51 PM

That number is low.


Very. That team has a chance to win 10 games and make noise in the playoffs.
  • 0

#16 T0mShane

T0mShane

    From devil to Bevell, '15

  • Members
  • 25,748 posts

Posted 10 May 2013 - 09:55 PM

That number is low.


Meh. They've got the Falcons and Saints in the division, and Carolina should be improved. Tough road.
  • 0
Well, that's the internet, man: 9 billion tough guys who secretly want to touch your pee-pee.

#17 Gastineau Lives

Gastineau Lives

    Future Internet Broadcasting Hall of Fame Inductee

  • Members
  • 3,762 posts

Posted 10 May 2013 - 10:12 PM

Meh. They've got the Falcons and Saints in the division, and Carolina should be improved. Tough road.

Negative Nelly.


  • 0

#18 Gastineau Lives

Gastineau Lives

    Future Internet Broadcasting Hall of Fame Inductee

  • Members
  • 3,762 posts

Posted 10 May 2013 - 10:52 PM

Very. That team has a chance to win 10 games and make noise in the playoffs.

It feels good to finally agree with you about something.


  • 0

#19 CrazyCarl40

CrazyCarl40

    3rd Year Veteran

  • Members
  • 11,267 posts

Posted 11 May 2013 - 04:23 AM

It feels good to finally agree with you about something.


I feel like I need a warm bath but. Yeah.
  • 0

#20 The Crusher

The Crusher

    DROY

  • Moderators
  • 28,893 posts

Posted 11 May 2013 - 04:41 AM

7 is reasonable.  Rex's defense will get that.  If by some grace of God we get even the smallest slice of adequate to moderate to not quite catastrophic QB play the over is the bet here.  


  • 0

unclerico.gif


#21 Maxman

Maxman

    Mr. Jet Nation

  • Administrators
  • 57,508 posts
  • LocationJN Server Room

Posted 11 May 2013 - 11:09 AM

Take the over!


  • 0


#22 JADEDGREEN

JADEDGREEN

    Annoying

  • Banned
  • 2,160 posts
  • LocationFree

Posted 11 May 2013 - 11:15 AM

Jaded Green's Ban O/U is week 6.


  • 0


#23 faba

faba

    Moderator

  • Moderators
  • 25,091 posts
  • LocationHolmdel

Posted 11 May 2013 - 02:31 PM

Take the over!

Oh no here he goes again with his predictions-Herm will be proud of you


  • 0
Treat people with how you want to be treated-with respect.

#24 Bleedin Green

Bleedin Green

    SuperTwat

  • Members
  • 20,618 posts

Posted 13 May 2013 - 08:42 AM

Jaded Green's Ban O/U is week 6.

 

I'll take the under every time.


  • 0
By day he's the (not so) mild-mannered Bleedin Green, but by night...

#25 JADEDGREEN

JADEDGREEN

    Annoying

  • Banned
  • 2,160 posts
  • LocationFree

Posted 13 May 2013 - 08:51 AM

I'll take the under every time.

 

SHOCKER!!!


  • 0





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users