Not sure what's funny he's objectively better. Always has been. Even in ellsbury's best season Granderson was better than hm (at worst even with him.) What was your brain dead argument anyway? Can't say that I remember. Something about batting avg being the most important stat and k's being evil or some other silliness irrational crap. BTW I also said that Brett Gardner was better than Ellsbury which other than one season, is proving to be true as well.
So, if your premise holds true that Granderson is better, then why did the Yankees effectively replace him with Ellsbury?
Edited by CrazyCarl40, 09 July 2014 - 04:52 PM.