Nolder Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 Making excuses for sub-standard QB's? Can I be a sub standard QB? I will lead the Jets to the super bowl I promise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 1. Crusher makes jokes always. The trick is to learn when it's for genuine fun and when he's using his meta to mask his scum agenda. It's D1 and I'm feeling him out, why you gotta step all over that and defend him? Not that he really addressed me anyway aside from making another joke. 2. Yes it is. Smash has been around and should know what he just did was retarded. I don't need to explain it to him. He wants me to so he can bog me and the thread down in a pointless discussion about the pros and cons of no lynching instead of scum hunting like we should be. I'm not going to let him do that. I would much rather he explain why this game of all games is the game to no lynch D1 on. Have we seen him do it in other recent games? No. So it bears explaining and that's exactly what I expect him to do. 1. Eeew... I'm not defending him, I'm noticing how you're packaging up your statements to make people look bad. Hell, you did it just now, connecting me to him. 2. I don't get where you are coming from. Smash's "no lynch" vote and your reaction to it seem to be what will serve as the shift from joke votes to real play... so I don't agree that "pointless rhetoric" applies. EDIT: the discussion of pros and cons of anything IS the medium for scum hunting. I feel like you are throwing the generic "he should be scumhunting" note out there, in a circumstance where there was nothing game related going on. Nobody is "scumhunting" on page 3. There is no "pointless rhetoric" if it shifts the game into gear... because that IS what will lead to eventually scumhunting. In other words, you are coming across as disingenuous in the poitns you are making. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWWWombat Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 Making excuses for sub-standard QB's? BWahahahahahha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWWWombat Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 I like Nolder right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leelou Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 Agreed. Vote: No Lynch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWWWombat Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 Oh sorry. unvote Vote: Verbal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leelou Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 unvote, vote Dingbat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolder Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 1. Eeew... I'm not defending him, I'm noticing how you're packaging up your statements to make people look bad. Hell, you did it just now, connecting me to him. 2. I don't get where you are coming from. Smash's "no lynch" vote and your reaction to it seem to be what will serve as the shift from joke votes to real play... so I don't agree that "pointless rhetoric" applies. 1. If they look bad it's because they've done bad. A duck is a duck I'm just putting a name to this sh*t. And yeah if you're gonna step in the middle before someone addresses an accusation (obviously Crusher is going to avoid but that's besides the point) you're speaking for them aka defending them. If you weren't you would have let Crusher say something first then you'd try to poke holes in what I put out there. As it is you've completely deflected the issue from Crusher and even Smash and made it about me and you. 2. So you're going to use the tired old defense of "he was acting stupid on purpose to set a trap!"? Pro tip, sometimes an idiot is just an idiot. I don't know what Smash's deal is but I'm not going to spend time explaining to him why his move was dumb until he explains why he thinks it's necessary or good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWWWombat Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 unvote, vote Dingbat unvote Vote: SMC? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolder Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 I like Nolder right now. I don't. My head hurts. I drank way too much last night. As an aside has anyone ever watched princess bride drunk? I feel like it enhances the movie a lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWWWombat Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 1. If they look bad it's because they've done bad. A duck is a duck I'm just putting a name to this sh*t. And yeah if you're gonna step in the middle before someone addresses an accusation (obviously Crusher is going to avoid but that's besides the point) you're speaking for them aka defending them. If you weren't you would have let Crusher say something first then you'd try to poke holes in what I put out there. As it is you've completely deflected the issue from Crusher and even Smash and made it about me and you. 2. So you're going to use the tired old defense of "he was acting stupid on purpose to set a trap!"? Pro tip, sometimes an idiot is just an idiot. I don't know what Smash's deal is but I'm not going to spend time explaining to him why his move was dumb until he explains why he thinks it's necessary or good. Q(o_oQ) Nolder fighting! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWWWombat Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 I don't. My head hurts. I drank way too much last night. As an aside has anyone ever watched princess bride drunk? I feel like it enhances the movie a lot. Could always try hair of the dog lel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lizard King Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 1. If they look bad it's because they've done bad. A duck is a duck I'm just putting a name to this sh*t. And yeah if you're gonna step in the middle before someone addresses an accusation (obviously Crusher is going to avoid but that's besides the point) you're speaking for them aka defending them. If you weren't you would have let Crusher say something first then you'd try to poke holes in what I put out there. As it is you've completely deflected the issue from Crusher and even Smash and made it about me and you. 2. So you're going to use the tired old defense of "he was acting stupid on purpose to set a trap!"? Pro tip, sometimes an idiot is just an idiot. I don't know what Smash's deal is but I'm not going to spend time explaining to him why his move was dumb until he explains why he thinks it's necessary or good. my nigga just said pro tip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolder Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 my nigga just said pro tip Wow that's so offensive. I identify as a transnormative hetero mollusk. Check your ******* reptile privilege a$$hole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolder Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 Could always try hair of the dog lel Is this a movie reference? I didn't watch the whole thing I fell asleep and I've never seen the entire thing just bits and pieces. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verbal Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 Ahh, feels like home. And it's been too long since I've done this. Vote Verbal h8u Welcome home. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWWWombat Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 hair of the dog = drinking while hungover Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verbal Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 Agreed. Vote: No Lynch h8u2 Pain in the ass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leelou Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 h8u2 Pain in the ass. CHOO CHOO? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crusher Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 hair of the dog = drinking while hungover Pac would try to brush it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lizard King Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 Wow that's so offensive. I identify as a transnormative hetero mollusk. Check your ******* reptile privilege a$$hole. Unvote Vote Nolder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crusher Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 Can I be a sub standard QB? I will lead the Jets to the super bowl I promise. You haven;t mastered being a sub standard human yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWWWombat Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 unvote Vote Lizard King Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolder Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 hair of the dog = drinking while hungover I've done that a couple times. Works surprisingly well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolder Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 You haven;t mastered being a sub standard human yet. CTM has, maybe you should ask him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verbal Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 No Lynch sucks because you can't pin scum down trying to bus a teammate, white knight a townie, etc. They know nobody from their team is at risk, and they'll play loose and make less mistakes. A town-driven lynch will inevitably force some scum to take stances on certain players early, and potentially defend/distance....none of which will occur on a D1 where nobody is going to die. Also, No Lynch is better in late game when town power roles are alive and with odd vs even numbers, it sometimes makes mathematical sense to No Lynch in order to put off endgame and allow the Cop one more viewing, etc. Also, based on the setup we know of this game, nothing points to a setup that favors No Lynch. Doggin's old Red Scare game is the closest to a setup designed around that mechanic. So, yeah. No Lynch is a sh*t play on D1. Case closed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolder Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 Unvote Vote Nolder WOW I AM SO OFFENDED RIGHT NOW I NEED TO BLOG ABOUT THIS BRB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWWWombat Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 Dia de Muerto. I'm thinking people should die during the day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolder Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 No Lynch sucks because you can't pin scum down trying to bus a teammate, white knight a townie, etc. They know nobody from their team is at risk, and they'll play loose and make less mistakes. A town-driven lynch will inevitably force some scum to take stances on certain players early, and potentially defend/distance....none of which will occur on a D1 where nobody is going to die. Also, No Lynch is better in late game when town power roles are alive and with odd vs even numbers, it sometimes makes mathematical sense to No Lynch in order to put off endgame and allow the Cop one more viewing, etc. Also, based on the setup we know of this game, nothing points to a setup that favors No Lynch. Doggin's old Red Scare game is the closest to a setup designed around that mechanic. So, yeah. No Lynch is a sh*t play on D1. Case closed. Don't waste time on this dumbdumb. If he's scum it's what he wants. Watch him come back and argue about what you just said now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWWWombat Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 Don't waste time on this dumbdumb. If he's scum it's what he wants. Watch him come back and argue about what you just said now. Trying to use reverse psychology and insults to make Smash tunnel. Do not like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Verbal Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 CHOO CHOO? Not yet. Nolder looks good here. Ape & Smash both look bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWWWombat Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 unvote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolder Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 I'm not capable of reverse psychology. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leelou Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 Not yet. Nolder looks good here. Ape & Smash both look bad. Has Smash ever started with this Day 1 No Lynch nonsense before? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWWWombat Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 I'm not capable of reverse psychology. Nonsense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.