Jump to content

  •  

Welcome to JetNation.com


Sign In  Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter

Create Account
Welcome to JetNation.com, your home for New York Jets talk. We are an independent site, which means we aren't affiliated with the NY Jets or SNY. The opinions here are never censored. We want you to join in on the conversation, but don't worry this is a simple and FREE process. Be apart of JetNation.com by signing in or creating an account. When you create an account, you can also opt to use your existing Facebook or Twitter login.
  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get email updates
  • Get your own profile page and make new friends
  • Send personal messages to other members.
Also be sure to check us out on Facebook and Twitter.
 
Guest Message by DevFuse

Photo
- - - - -

Does John Idzik Use Nike SPARQ Scores To Scout Talent?


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 Villain The Foe

Villain The Foe

    6 Years Is Enough. Time To Fire Rex

  • Members
  • 3,631 posts

Posted 06 July 2014 - 09:23 PM

Please view link to see pSPARQ chart of Jet drafted Rookies

http://www.ganggreen...ke-sparq-scores

 

John Idzik and Nike SPARQ Scores

491370791.0_standard_709.0.jpg

The Seattle Seahawks have become known for drafting and signing freakishly athletic players. It turns out that there is a method to their madness. Their Strength and Conditioning Coach, Chris Carlisle, helped develop Nike's SPARQ rating system, which the Seahawks appear to be using to find athletic freaks. Speed kills, but more importantly, SPARQ looks at explosiveness for your given size. This is why smaller players tend to score worse on it, because SPARQ looks for guys that just defy the laws of physics, in the words of Danny Kelly over at Field Gulls. As Danny said, "You have to have talent, obviously, but bigger/faster/stronger DOES matter a LOT in the NFL." That's what SPARQ measures.

Although the exact formula for SPARQ is proprietary information and not subject to public dissemination, Field Gulls was able to essentially reverse engineer the formula and has calculated the scores for this entire past draft class. Where exact scores were not available, Field Gulls was able to approximate them. If you are looking at that document, the number to focus on is pSPARQ, which is a weighted number towards the players' position grouping. It's also interesting to look at players' z-score, which is how many standard deviations the player has from their position grouping. It's notable to me that many of the highly ranked players are undrafted free agents, which shows that they are freak athletes but not necessarily good, polished players.

 

Danny mentioned to me that since the system has been executed in Seattle through Pete Carroll, that John Idzik might have brought a version of it over to the New York Jets. As a result, I wanted to look at the 2014 draft class and compare each player to the average pSPARQ of their respective draft position.

 

POSITION POS. PSPARQ PLAYER PLAYER PSPARQ

 

WR 108.3 Jalen Saunders 97.0     Shaq Evans 117.2

TE 105.3 Jace Amaro 120.6

OG 90.0 Dakota Dozier 74.3

OLB 112.1 IK Enemkpali 103.7

ILB 109.4 Jeremiah George 123.4

CB 110.9 Dexter McDougle 118.0     Brandon Dixon 109.5

S 111.2 Calvin Pryor 107.8

 

 

As you can see, there doesn't seem to be a strong correlation between what the Jets have done and SPARQ scores. With the exception of Dozier and Saunders (who is an exception because, as I've said, small players score poorly), the draft class is generally around their respective averages. On the whole, the class is above average among all players, but I don't think it's conclusive enough to say the team is definitively using SPARQ scores to judge draft prospects. It will be interesting to see what the team does in the future under John Idzik and if the connection between draft picks and SPARQ scores becomes more highly correlated.

Note: Scores were not available for Quincy Enunwa, Tajh Boyd, or Trevor Reilly.


Edited by Villain The Foe, 06 July 2014 - 09:32 PM.

  • 0

NYJetsScript.gif


#2 JoeC36

JoeC36

    JetNation's Keeper Of The Anals

  • Moderators
  • 11,865 posts

Posted 06 July 2014 - 09:54 PM

the last sentence says it all, it will be interesting to see


  • 0

289 Time Post of the Week Loser


#3 Lizard King

Lizard King

    Perpetual Mediocrity

  • Members
  • 5,627 posts
  • LocationMendham, NJ

Posted 06 July 2014 - 10:25 PM

How lazy can an author be? Grading the recent draft and in his own article he even mentions that the best scores in Seattle are from the undrafted guys? Wtf man?
  • 0

#4 Lizard King

Lizard King

    Perpetual Mediocrity

  • Members
  • 5,627 posts
  • LocationMendham, NJ

Posted 06 July 2014 - 10:27 PM

I totally agree with the observation though that Seattle is freakishly athletic. Formula or not, they're signing power and athleticism at every position over there, no question.
  • 0

#5 RutgersJetFan

RutgersJetFan

    Bring me Solo and the Wookie

  • Members
  • 17,326 posts

Posted 06 July 2014 - 10:58 PM

As you can see, there doesn't seem to be a strong correlation between what the Jets have done and SPARQ scores. With the exception of Dozier and Saunders (who is an exception because, as I've said, small players score poorly), the draft class is generally around their respective averages.


Here's the fun thing about actually reading, you get to curse the author under your breath for wasting your ******* time.
  • 1

(Chandler)'s a nice piece as long as he's the 7th most important player on your roster....I think they're going to be disappointed when they see he's just a pumped-up Drew Gooden.


#6 dbatesman

dbatesman

    Failgoat 2.0

  • Members
  • 8,846 posts

Posted 06 July 2014 - 11:19 PM

Here's the fun thing about actually reading, you get to curse the author under your breath for wasting your ******* time.

 

Seriously, what the ******* **** was all that?


  • 0

This is like having a cat with leukemia.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users