Bob Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 We guaranteed they won't be a SB contender in the foreseeable future, we got rid of the anchor around our own necks AND WE GOT THEM TO PAY US FOR IT! BRILLIANT! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetlag Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 Bob we definitely are winners in this situation. I wish we could have gotten more but Herm wasn't worth any more so I'll take the 4th and run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Preston Howley III Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 What exactly is it that Herm did here, anyway? I'm sure he'll find an OC and a DC who want to work for him. I was reading some KC boards, and one guy was like "he's gonna fix our defense". Man, get ready to have the rug pulled out from under your feet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smizzy Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 I do see this perspective but right now I can't embrace it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Preston Howley III Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonEJet Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 If Herm wins in KC, and I PRAY he doesn't.....you clowns will say "Herm should have never left" I can see it already Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 F herm He has no shot in KC, none!!!!!!!!! We need woody to sell the team to George S Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Preston Howley III Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 Do Chief's fans know that Luau Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 We guaranteed they won't be a SB contender in the foreseeable future, we got rid of the anchor around our own necks AND WE GOT THEM TO PAY US FOR IT! When did the Jets trade PennyBoy to the Chiefs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Preston Howley III Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 We needed to score some points, and obviously we didn't do that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 We guaranteed they won't be a SB contender in the foreseeable future, we got rid of the anchor around our own necks AND WE GOT THEM TO PAY US FOR IT! BRILLIANT! To get a fourth round pick for a 4-12 coach? Brilliant!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sirlancemehlot Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 I do see this perspective but right now I can't embrace it. nor should you. I don't usually knock posts that I disagree with, but the one starting this thread is flawed on so many levels I can't help it. KC has a head coach. We don't, because we gave away our HC even though we had him under contract for two more years. I had no use for Herm here in NY, so getting something for a coach I didn't like should be enough except for one thing...he was valuable to KC and had value elsewhere in the league. If KC wanted exclusive rights to the opportunity to take him without a bidding war or leverage by other squads, they should have paid us his market value. Put it this way, I have a 1976 cadillac eldorado convertible in my garage. It looks great, is nice and shiny, but only runs fair. So I don't drive it much and certainly have little practical use for it. By your reasoning (not you Smizz, obviously) I should hand it over to next guy who offers me a hundred bucks to take it off my hands since I don't really need it anyway. That's how it works, right? So what if it's worth ten grand. I don't lose if I get anything at all, since getting $100 for something I don't need is a great situation for me! Rediculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 nor should you. I don't usually knock posts that I disagree with, but the one starting this thread is flawed on so many levels I can't help it. KC has a head coach. We don't, because we gave away our HC even though we had him under contract for two more years. I had no use for Herm here in NY, so getting something for a coach I didn't like should be enough except for one thing...he was valuable to KC and had value elsewhere in the league. If KC wanted exclusive rights to the opportunity to take him without a bidding war or leverage by other squads, they should have paid us his market value. Put it this way, I have a 1976 cadillac eldorado convertible in my garage. It looks great, is nice and shiny, but only runs fair. So I don't drive it much and certainly have little practical use for it. By your reasoning (not you Smizz, obviously) I should hand it over to next guy who offers me a hundred bucks to take it off my hands since I don't really need it anyway. That's how it works, right? So what if it's worth ten grand. I don't lose if I get anything at all, since getting $100 for something I don't need is a great situation for me! Rediculous. Without a doubt, the best post on the entire Hermy-KC fiasco. The Jets got absolutely hosed by KC. Great post SirLance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 Without a doubt, the best post on the entire Hermy-KC fiasco. The Jets got absolutely hosed by KC. Great post SirLance. the jets could trade doug jolley and a 5th round pick for tomlinson and you'd say they got hosed. you're as bad a homer as they come. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PETROCK Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 I just home that Herm brings Pennington with him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted January 8, 2006 Author Share Posted January 8, 2006 nor should you. I don't usually knock posts that I disagree with, but the one starting this thread is flawed on so many levels I can't help it. KC has a head coach. We don't, because we gave away our HC even though we had him under contract for two more years. I had no use for Herm here in NY, so getting something for a coach I didn't like should be enough except for one thing...he was valuable to KC and had value elsewhere in the league. If KC wanted exclusive rights to the opportunity to take him without a bidding war or leverage by other squads, they should have paid us his market value. Put it this way, I have a 1976 cadillac eldorado convertible in my garage. It looks great, is nice and shiny, but only runs fair. So I don't drive it much and certainly have little practical use for it. By your reasoning (not you Smizz, obviously) I should hand it over to next guy who offers me a hundred bucks to take it off my hands since I don't really need it anyway. That's how it works, right? So what if it's worth ten grand. I don't lose if I get anything at all, since getting $100 for something I don't need is a great situation for me! Rediculous. Nonsense. For a better analogy, let's assume that ElDo was shorting out, starting fires that were burning down your garage. Are you better without it starting fires, or do you let it continue to destroy your property while waiting for that 10k that you think it's worth? Let it burn down garages in KC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage69 Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 nor should you. I don't usually knock posts that I disagree with, but the one starting this thread is flawed on so many levels I can't help it. KC has a head coach. We don't, because we gave away our HC even though we had him under contract for two more years. I had no use for Herm here in NY, so getting something for a coach I didn't like should be enough except for one thing...he was valuable to KC and had value elsewhere in the league. If KC wanted exclusive rights to the opportunity to take him without a bidding war or leverage by other squads, they should have paid us his market value. Put it this way, I have a 1976 cadillac eldorado convertible in my garage. It looks great, is nice and shiny, but only runs fair. So I don't drive it much and certainly have little practical use for it. By your reasoning (not you Smizz, obviously) I should hand it over to next guy who offers me a hundred bucks to take it off my hands since I don't really need it anyway. That's how it works, right? So what if it's worth ten grand. I don't lose if I get anything at all, since getting $100 for something I don't need is a great situation for me! Rediculous. Your Caddy knows it a Car and Not a HC..Hermie didn't! :wink: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage69 Posted January 8, 2006 Share Posted January 8, 2006 nor should you. I don't usually knock posts that I disagree with, but the one starting this thread is flawed on so many levels I can't help it. KC has a head coach. We don't, because we gave away our HC even though we had him under contract for two more years. I had no use for Herm here in NY, so getting something for a coach I didn't like should be enough except for one thing...he was valuable to KC and had value elsewhere in the league. If KC wanted exclusive rights to the opportunity to take him without a bidding war or leverage by other squads, they should have paid us his market value. Put it this way, I have a 1976 cadillac eldorado convertible in my garage. It looks great, is nice and shiny, but only runs fair. So I don't drive it much and certainly have little practical use for it. By your reasoning (not you Smizz, obviously) I should hand it over to next guy who offers me a hundred bucks to take it off my hands since I don't really need it anyway. That's how it works, right? So what if it's worth ten grand. I don't lose if I get anything at all, since getting $100 for something I don't need is a great situation for me! Rediculous. Your Caddy knows it's a Car and Not a HC..Hermie didn't! :wink: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GimmeShelter Posted January 9, 2006 Share Posted January 9, 2006 Nonsense. For a better analogy, let's assume that ElDo was shorting out, starting fires that were burning down your garage. Are you better without it starting fires, or do you let it continue to destroy your property while waiting for that 10k that you think it's worth? Let it burn down garages in KC. Good points on both posts but I agree with Bob. If the Jets had said no to a 4th rounder all we would read here is how we blew a chance to get rid of Herm and aquire a pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.05f3dc52804d5fd84cf09ccfcd7bd10b.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.