Do you give up Mo or Sheldon in a trade to move up in the draft?

[CobraVerde]

you decide ;D

[Joe W. Namath]

Richardson is playing on a rookie contract. There is no chance he gets traded. Mo could be moved because he wants to get paid, but i dont know what hes worth in draft picks.

[Ghost]

Here's my question: Why would we trade them?

[CrazyCarl40]

Not sure there is a player worth moving up for. Sheldon isn't going anywhere. Mo could be moved for the right price, but he's in a walk year.

[Matt39]

I'd keep our good players, but that's just me.

[dbatesman]

Gotta give up good cheap young players so we get a shot to draft good cheap young players

[Matt39]

Gotta give up good cheap young players so we get a shot to draft good cheap young players

 

lol

[ComfortablyNumb]

No freaking way

[ZachEY]

Start Matt Simms and trade our two best players. You're just the best.

[joewilly12]

NO

[Vinny16]

No.  This is pretty much a no brainer.

 

The Jets have one area of strength, and that's the D-line.  With around $50 million in cap space to work with, they don't need to take away from that one area of strength for the potential to add to another through the draft.  

[BigRy56]

Oh my God this is gonna be a nightmare off-season isn't it

[CrazyCarl40]

Oh my God this is gonna be a nightmare off-season isn't it

Welcome to the Thunderdome. It's not even day 1.

[Matt39]

Welcome to the Thunderdome. It's not even day 1.

 

I think we should bring back Braylon Edwards.

[funaz]

I'd trade mo, overrated by our fans. Sheldon can play a 4-3 so year I'd keep hom

sent from my Lumia 1020 using tapatalk.

[Il Mostro]

Welcome to the Thunderdome. It's not even day 1.

 

 

More like the Dunderdome.  Whatever the f*ck that means.

[Klecko73isGod]

LDBR

[BallinPB]

This is just stupid. The only reason you should even think about giving up them is if you had cap problems which we certainly don't have. You don't win by trading the best players on your team.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Vinny16]

This is just stupid. The only reason you should even think about giving up them is if you had cap problems which we certainly don't have. You don't win by trading the best players on your team.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Agreed.  The fact that it would be a dumb move for the Jets probably means its likely to happen as well.  

[Larz]

how about mo, sheldon, and mangold to get to #5 ?

[derp]

Stand pat (can't do any worse than the Jets did at 6th overall last time) or move down.

 

Definitely don't want to give up either of those guys - only scenario where it gets interesting is in a new defensive scheme and I still think you make either of them work in any system, particularly Richardson.

[vincenzo69]

Will has only one year left before he hits FA and we have to either franchise him or extend him. So it's not a stupid suggestion however the only player I move up for is Cooper.

Would not trade up for mariota

[vincenzo69]

No.  This is pretty much a no brainer.

 

The Jets have one area of strength, and that's the D-line.  With around $50 million in cap space to work with, they don't need to take away from that one area of strength for the potential to add to another through the draft.

Yeah but we need a WR. Harvin us really a slot guy 3rd receiver. Decker, Cooper and Harvin could make any qb look good 1-3 of them are open every play.

[Integrity28]

This isn't even a viable enough question for the sake of conversation.

[Vinny16]

Yeah but we need a WR. Harvin us really a slot guy 3rd receiver. Decker, Cooper and Harvin could make any qb look good 1-3 of them are open every play.

 

I still wouldn't move one of those players to move up in the draft a couple of spots.  Maybe I would do it if the unquestioned QB of the future was sitting there and we had a chance to move up to get him, but not for a WR, especially when we have nobody to throw him the ball at this point.

 

Now, granted, that could change depending on what we do in FA, but based on what we currently have, I'd hold onto the #6 pick, Mo, and Richardson.

[CrazyCarl40]

This isn't even a viable enough question for the sake of conversation.

When we traded Revis, we had to draft his replacement immediately because he wasn't on the roster. Still isn't. If we traded Mo Wilk, would we really be losing all that much with the next man up? Especially if they go 4-3 and kick Coples inside? Not in a package to move up, but he might bring back actual value. It's good for thought. Moving Richardson is not.

[SMC]

Generally speaking, good teams don't trade good, homegrown talent before their first FA contract in the hopes of drafting good players.

 

Good teams surround those good, homegrown players with more good, homegrown players.

 

Otherwise the team is in the zero-sum gain business, which the Jets usually find themselves in.

[vincenzo69]

I'm all for leaving Wilk as is on our roster and have him play for his pay day helping us win games next season. Worse comes to worse we can just tag him for the 2016 season

[The Great One]

Move up? For who ?

[OuttaSightPF]

If we land Suh in free agency I'd switch to a 4 man D-line with Coples, Harrison, Suh and Richardson.

Wilkerson will be HUGE trade bait if Rex gets another HC job. He will give up anything for Mo, and I think he's simply not worth it. He's expecting a Watt-like pay day, and he's not at that level.

Buy low and sell high.

[vincenzo69]

Move up? For who ?

Cooper.

[JohnnyLV]

Not to move up, but if you can get a mid to high level first rounder for Mo you have to consider it because of the rebuild we will be in.

[The Great One]

Cooper.

Where is the Coop projected? I'd think he'd be around no?

[BigRy56]

Where is the Coop projected? I'd think he'd be around no?

He seems to be a top 10 lock. Whether or not he gets drafted in the top 5 will rely purely on the Raiders or a trade up.

[Shockwave]

I am really hoping Mo is extended but things are not looking good for him here. Its a crime that Idzik didn't extend him. Im almost more pissed about that then some of those sh*tty picks.