32EBoozer Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 They have a worse receiving corp than we had in '13.... Add to that Revis and Browner in coverage and all you have to cover is 2 guys with 5 defensive players. You've got 2 guys "spying" Russell Wilson and Collins on the TE. The other 6 focus on shutting down Lynch. Seattle Defense is going to have to win this game because the matchups just aren't there for Seattle. I think GB would have stood a better chance of beating Brady because Rodgers could go toe to toe with him and there are so many offensive weapons on GB. I guess I'll know on Monday 'cause I would rather watch Downton Abbey with my wife than the "CHEATERS" win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 They have a worse receiving corp than we had in '13.... Add to that Revis and Browner in coverage and all you have to cover is 2 guys with 5 defensive players. You've got 2 guys "spying" Russell Wilson and Collins on the TE. The other 6 focus on shutting down Lynch. Seattle Defense is going to have to win this game because the matchups just aren't there for Seattle. I think GB would have stood a better chance of beating Brady because Rodgers could go toe to toe with him and there are so many offensive weapons on GB. I guess I'll know on Monday 'cause I would rather watch Downton Abbey with my wife than the "CHEATERS" win. Like Jaws said on Mike and Mike this morning, if the Pats can keep Wilson in the pocket, they win the game easily. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GimmeShelter Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 meh...I recall posts and trolls saying that the Pats would destroy the Ravens. Turned out that they needed to confuse the refs in order to gain a competitive edge needed to pull out a close win. Wilson needs to play smarter than the Packer game. If he does that Lynch runs wild. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gastineau Lives Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 They have a worse receiving corp than we had in '13.... Add to that Revis and Browner in coverage and all you have to cover is 2 guys with 5 defensive players. You've got 2 guys "spying" Russell Wilson and Collins on the TE. The other 6 focus on shutting down Lynch. Seattle Defense is going to have to win this game because the matchups just aren't there for Seattle. I think GB would have stood a better chance of beating Brady because Rodgers could go toe to toe with him and there are so many offensive weapons on GB. I guess I'll know on Monday 'cause I would rather watch Downton Abbey with my wife than the "CHEATERS" win. Is it me or has the show lost something? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoadFan Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 Like Jaws said on Mike and Mike this morning, if the Pats can keep Wilson in the pocket, they win the game easily. Really? And who is going to tackle Marshawn? Ivory chewed them up. Marshawn will swish and spit them out too. And the Cheatriots will get zero calls from the officials due to the embarrassment of deflategate. When Brady throws a temper tantrum about someone daring to touch his jersey... he wont get roughing the passer. It will be unsportsmanlike conduct instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 Really? And who is going to tackle Marshawn? Ivory chewed them up. Marshawn will swish and spit them out too. Once the Pats go up 14+ points, Lynch becomes a non-factor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southparkcpa Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 Once the Pats go up 14+ points, Lynch becomes a non-factor. Heard Westhoff say the Hawks will beat them handily. Running game is Pats weakness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoadFan Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 Once the Pats go up 14+ points, Lynch becomes a non-factor. Yeah. .. just like when the Pack was up 16 at half. Read the add on edit too, troll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crusher Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 Once the Pats go up 14+ points, Lynch becomes a non-factor. I actually decided to not watch the game. First time ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronx Jet Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 Heard Westhoff say the Hawks will beat them handily. Running game is Pats weakness. Exactly. People forget they can be torn up in the with the running game. They dared the Jets to pass and we still chewed them up, Hawks will demolish them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southparkcpa Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 Exactly. People forget they can be torn up in the with the running game. They dared the Jets to pass and we still chewed them up, Hawks will demolish them I'll be on a cloud Monday. THAT would be my Super Bowl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 Exactly. People forget they can be torn up in the with the running game. They dared the Jets to pass and we still chewed them up, Hawks will demolish them Yep, the Seahawks are so good that now they are underdogs in the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larz Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 I don't think the past* shell game will catch the hawks off guard. carroll is ready for that bullsh*t the balls will be approved by PWC prior to kickoff, and it shouldn't rain so the deflate advantage should be nullified kam can cover gronk past* have been cheating because they are a soft finesse team, hawks should roll their punk asses Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 Darrell Bevell is a genius and can win Super Bowls with zero receiving talent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
32EBoozer Posted January 28, 2015 Author Share Posted January 28, 2015 I actually decided to not watch the game. First time ever. I feel you... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
32EBoozer Posted January 28, 2015 Author Share Posted January 28, 2015 Exactly. People forget they can be torn up in the with the running game. They dared the Jets to pass and we still chewed them up, Hawks will demolish them 8-9 in the box will be difficult to run on. Wilson needs to make some plays downfield. I pray that you're right. We'll need TEX to update us on this board since none of us will be watching the game! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rillo Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 Unfortunately, I think the Pats take it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRONX DUDE Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 Like Jaws said on Mike and Mike this morning, if the Pats can keep Wilson in the pocket, they win the game easily. WOW - how many super bowls did the POLISH RIFLE win? I will stick with the 'hawks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New York Mick Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 This game is going to be won or lost by Wilson. If he has a bad game like he did in the NFCC they'll get killed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Ray1 Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 Once the Pats go up 14+ points, Lynch becomes a non-factor. Packers thought the same thing, how did that work out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
32EBoozer Posted January 28, 2015 Author Share Posted January 28, 2015 Packers thought the same thing, how did that work out? Ohhhh! I saw what you did there! Nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Villain The Foe Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 They have a worse receiving corp than we had in '13.... Add to that Revis and Browner in coverage and all you have to cover is 2 guys with 5 defensive players. You've got 2 guys "spying" Russell Wilson and Collins on the TE. The other 6 focus on shutting down Lynch. Seattle Defense is going to have to win this game because the matchups just aren't there for Seattle. I think GB would have stood a better chance of beating Brady because Rodgers could go toe to toe with him and there are so many offensive weapons on GB. I guess I'll know on Monday 'cause I would rather watch Downton Abbey with my wife than the "CHEATERS" win. I remember when the Giants couldn't match up....twice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRONX DUDE Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 - - - - Ya' think Bevell is missing Percy and Golden right now? NO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 Darrell Bevell is a genius and can win Super Bowls with zero receiving talent. Rep'd because I appreciate self-deprecating humor. Also, Seahawks have to win this game. Preferably going away, because I have work early on Monday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaliforniaJet Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 If the Pats don't cheat in this game they lose by 30. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j4jets Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 meh...I recall posts and trolls saying that the Pats would destroy the Ravens. Turned out that they needed to confuse the refs in order to gain a competitive edge needed to pull out a close win. Wilson needs to play smarter than the Packer game. If he does that Lynch runs wild. Don't forget the deflategate. Oh yeah, the Ravens raised the issue even before the Indy game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
32EBoozer Posted January 28, 2015 Author Share Posted January 28, 2015 Rep'd because I appreciate self-deprecating humor. Also, Seahawks have to win this game. Preferably going away, because I have work early on Monday. I guess you're not on the "refuse to watch the game out of disgust" bandwagon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 Rep'd because I appreciate self-deprecating humor. Also, Seahawks have to win this game. Preferably going away, because I have work early on Monday. Real football fans do not go into work the day after the Super Bowl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesr Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 I think GB would have stood a better chance of beating Brady because Rodgers could go toe to toe with him and there are so many offensive weapons on GB. When Patsies played GB AT LAMBEAU FIELD with all the benefits that entailed, GB only won by 5 ... on neutral territory I'd expect Patsies to edge that one. I have more faith in Seattle giving them the beating they deserve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
32EBoozer Posted January 28, 2015 Author Share Posted January 28, 2015 Real football fans do not go into work the day after the Super Bowl. Real football fans don't follow players or coaches that cheat. Barry Bonds, McGuire, Sosa, Brady and Bellichek come to mind. Buffalo's looking for fan's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
32EBoozer Posted January 28, 2015 Author Share Posted January 28, 2015 When Patsies played GB AT LAMBEAU FIELD with all the benefits that entailed, GB only won by 5 ... on neutral territory I'd expect Patsies to edge that one. I have more faith in Seattle giving them the beating they deserve. Man, I hope you're right! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crusher Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 Real football fans do not go into work the day after the Super Bowl. How can a league that allows, protects and rewards cheating have real fans? Man you are on a role lately. Keep it coming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 It was all part of the strategy. The Seahawks have no # 1 receiver for Darrelle Revis to shut down. Revis will get so bored covering Doug Baldwin he won't be ready for Marshawn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patman Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 Really? And who is going to tackle Marshawn? Ivory chewed them up. Marshawn will swish and spit them out too. And the Cheatriots will get zero calls from the officials due to the embarrassment of deflategate. When Brady throws a temper tantrum about someone daring to touch his jersey... he wont get roughing the passer. It will be unsportsmanlike conduct instead. Unsportsmanlike conduct is roughing the passer. There is no foul for throwing a temper tantrum as long as he don't swear at the ref or take his helmet off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GimmeShelter Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 8-9 in the box will be difficult to run on. Wilson needs to make some plays downfield. I pray that you're right. We'll need TEX to update us on this board since none of us will be watching the game! 8-9 in the box will be difficult to run on. Wilson needs to make some plays downfield. I pray that you're right. We'll need TEX to update us on this board since none of us will be watching the game! TX's version of a SB get together. Some cold cuts, chocolate milk, laptop and a Jets message board......two decades and counting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.