HessStation Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 Yeah a terribly unrealistic one ... lol It's the same as asking how could they score at the end of the first half with 30 secs left. anything can happen. You're just as guilty for asking the hypothetical as you are for sh*tting on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HessStation Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 So it's unrealistic, with 1 yard to go, to run 2 dive plays in 26 seconds? Unfortunately I think he's trolling but it was still worth a shot talking to him today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetrider Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 It's the same as asking how could they score at the end of the first half with 30 secs left. anything can happen. You're just as guilty for asking the hypothetical as you are for sh*tting on it. Really? It's the same? They did that with 5 straight pass plays and 2 TOs ... LMAO. Thanks for bolstering the argument for not running it. Once again, you have no clue what you're babbling about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetrider Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 So it's unrealistic, with 1 yard to go, to run 2 dive plays in 26 seconds? Of course, they could run on 2nd down. Call TO. Run again on 3rd down. Carroll was trying to give themselves 4 chances, which is where he debatably miscalculated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HessStation Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 Really? It's the same? They did that with 5 straight pass plays and 2 TOs ... LMAO. Thanks for bolstering the argument for not running it. Once again, you have no clue what you're babbling about. The beauty of a message board is that's it's all out in the open for everyone to see who the real idiot is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 Of course, they could run on 2nd down. Call TO. Run again on 3rd down. Carroll was trying to give themselves 4 chances, which is where he debatably miscalculated. I am saying run 2 times and call a timeout to get 1 more shot. I am saying it's easily doable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetrider Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 The beauty of a message board is that's it's all out in the open for everyone to see who the real idiot is. That would be YOU ... exposed many posts ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 this is like bizzaro world and the worst part is I've been forced to side with that dirtbag hess... i will never 4give u Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HessStation Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 this is like bizzaro world and the worst part is I've been forced to side with that dirtbag hess... i will never 4give u The irony isn't lost on me scumbot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetrider Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 I am saying run 2 times and call a timeout to get 1 more shot. I am saying it's easily doable. I'm saying that's not a safe assumption when you can't predict how much time a play takes to run on the ground and get everyone back to the LOS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetrider Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 this is like bizzaro world and the worst part is I've been forced to side with that dirtbag hess... i will never 4give u You two are perfect for each other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 I'm saying that's not a safe assumption when you can't predict how much time a play takes to run on the ground and get everyone back to the LOS. You only need to do it 1 time. The second time, you call timeout, and you can influence it by running inside Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetrider Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 You only need to do it 1 time. The second time, you call timeout, and you can influence it by running inside You said you wanted to run TWO times then call a TO. Those two runs might leave you nothing on the clock. It's a definite risk. Certainly not "easily doable". Carroll didn't think it was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 You said you wanted to run TWO times then call a TO. Those two runs might leave you nothing on the clock. It's a definite risk. Certainly not "easily doable". Carroll didn't think it was. 1) how is that different. Run the dive, reset, run it again, call timeout. Meaning you only need to reset 1 time, the actual play takes 2-3 seconds tops, leaving 20 seconds to reset, which is easy 2) well, we all saw what carrol thought was a good idea AND.. never mind they burned 30 seconds before the play Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetrider Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 1) how is that different. Run the dive, reset, run it again, call timeout. Meaning you only need to reset 1 time, the actual play takes 2-3 seconds tops, leaving 20 seconds to reset, which is easy 2) well, we all saw what carrol thought was a good idea AND.. never mind they burned 30 seconds before the play 1. That's wishful thinking. Like i said, in your ideal world. 2. I was shocked too. But it could've worked with a better throw. AND ... unfortunately humans need time to think, decide, read the D ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 Now this, this sums up that game perfectly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larz Posted February 2, 2015 Share Posted February 2, 2015 Larz even opted out of the conversation. He was like, you're only hope. LOL. Good luck. Larz got tired of your desperate spin to win an argument you so clearly lost. it's just not worth going over and over 100 times, I made my point. If you can't just give credit to the past* player for whatever reason, your scapegoats should be wilson, lockette, bevell in that order simple Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeezerB Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 It's amazing the small things that separate Brady and Co. from being the Dynasty/GOAT they are now, and being the losingest team in Super Bowl History. A stop at the one vs. the Rams. A last second long FG here or there. Now the dumbest playcall in SB History. Amazing luck. and two ridiculous catches away from having 6 SB wins (Tyree Manningham). It goes both ways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HessStation Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 and two ridiculous catches away from having 6 SB wins (Tyree Manningham). It goes both ways. Ut oh newb Pats fan? What up dawg. Good timing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Ut oh newb Pats fan? What up dawg. Good timing. Gotta love Jets fans with their warm, sincere welcome of new posters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HessStation Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Gotta love Jets fans with their warm, sincere welcome of new posters. I actually appreciate yallz company here at rock bottom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Welker leaves New England and they dont miss a beat in replacing him with Edelman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Welker leaves New England and they dont miss a beat in replacing him with Edelman Edelman > Welker Edelman never dropped a pass to lose the Super Bowl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Edelman > Welker Edelman never dropped a pass to lose the Super Bowl. Edelman is tougher than Welker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.