Tinstar Posted April 12, 2015 Share Posted April 12, 2015 LE - Richardson NT - Harrison RE - Wilkerson OLB - Coples OLB - Pace ILB - Harris ILB - Davis CB - Revis CB - Cromartie FS - Gilchrist SS - Pryor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paradis Posted April 12, 2015 Share Posted April 12, 2015 start by ditching the defacto 3-4 look. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cant wait Posted April 12, 2015 Share Posted April 12, 2015 just add an speedy edge rusher. plus hope either mcdougle or milliner rehab well and push for the starting CB2 spot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jorge o8 Posted April 12, 2015 Share Posted April 12, 2015 love to get a edge rusher this D would be scary! I believe that or CBs are some of the best in the nfl with some young guys coming up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinstar Posted April 13, 2015 Author Share Posted April 13, 2015 Does anyone think Danny Shelton would upgrade this defense as it stands ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obrien2Toon Posted April 13, 2015 Share Posted April 13, 2015 Pace is the obvious eye sore. Dudes been finished for 5 years. Is it more pivotal to get the edge rusher to replace him or Scherf to solidify the line is the question I guess. I'd probably go Scherf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paradis Posted April 13, 2015 Share Posted April 13, 2015 LE - Richardson NT - Harrison RE - Wilkerson OLB - Coples OLB - Pace ILB - Harris ILB - Davis CB - Revis CB - Cromartie FS - Gilchrist SS - Pryor I'll tell what looks a lot more sexy and productive: DE - Coples DT - Wilkerson DT - Richardson DE - Ray OLB - T. Jones ILB - D. Harris OLB - D. Davis CB - Revis CB - Cro FS - Gilchrist SS - Pryor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinstar Posted April 13, 2015 Author Share Posted April 13, 2015 I'll tell what looks a lot more sexy and productive: DE - Coples DT - Wilkerson DT - Richardson DE - Ray OLB - T. Jones ILB - D. Harris OLB - D. Davis CB - Revis CB - Cro FS - Gilchrist SS - Pryor That's a 1st and 20 defense or a 3rd and long defense. That Defense needs a true NT on 1st and 10, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obrien2Toon Posted April 13, 2015 Share Posted April 13, 2015 That's a 1st and 20 defense or a 3rd and long defense. That Defense needs a true NT on 1st and 10,u can say that Harris is probably closer to a NT than an all around LB. But I agree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinstar Posted April 13, 2015 Author Share Posted April 13, 2015 Pace is the obvious eye sore. Dudes been finished for 5 years. Is it more pivotal to get the edge rusher to replace him or Scherf to solidify the line is the question I guess. I'd probably go Scherf. Not sure if he would be considered the BPA at 6 and the Jets have made it clear they will be taking the BPA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paradis Posted April 13, 2015 Share Posted April 13, 2015 That's a 1st and 20 defense or a 3rd and long defense. That Defense needs a true NT on 1st and 10, what you talking about wilson... we're not running a 3-4. aka no NT.... i'm sure we'll roll Harrison in a 30 front on some downs, but it's not like Bowles is married to rex's alignment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinstar Posted April 13, 2015 Author Share Posted April 13, 2015 what you talking about wilson... we're not running a 3-4. aka no NT.... i'm sure we'll roll Harrison in a 30 front on some downs, but it's not like Bowles is married to rex's alignment No, you misunderstand. I like your alignment. I was just wondering if an alignment of LE - Coples NT - Harrison DT - Richardson RE - Ray wouldn't be better on 1st and sometimes 2nd down., I think Richardson and Wilkerson are more get after the QB type DTs than actual run stuffers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paradis Posted April 13, 2015 Share Posted April 13, 2015 No, you misunderstand. I like your alignment. I was just wondering if an alignment of LE - Coples NT - Harrison DT - Richardson RE - Ray wouldn't be better on 1st and sometimes 2nd down., I think Richardson and Wilkerson are more get after the QB type DTs than actual run stuffers. I guess. I mean, they'll always be rotating the 3 of them throughout the game. As they will be with Pace, Ray and coples. So ya they'll be down and distance personel Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerfish Posted April 13, 2015 Share Posted April 13, 2015 There is no rule in this league that you can't use a guy as big as nt as dt in a 4-3 the vikings did it for years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinstar Posted April 13, 2015 Author Share Posted April 13, 2015 There is no rule in this league that you can't use a guy as big as nt as dt in a 4-3 the vikings did it for years. Never said there was. Some players are just better suited for certain jobs. Snacks is a pure NT who clogs the middle of the defense. Nobody is running into the LOS and making yards consistently. I never said Wilkerson couldn't do it or Richardson for that matter, but why waste a talent like that to do "wet work". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.