Jump to content

Boston Herald: Patriots Just Outsmart Everybody Else


flgreen

Recommended Posts

 

Patriots just outsmart everybody else

 

 

Monday, July 27, 2015 PrintEmail1 Comments

 

By:

The Numbers

Patriots coach Bill Belichick will look for more than just physical talent when the team enters training camp this week.

New England’s professor of pigskin also will look for players smart enough to study among the ivy walls of the NFL’s finest intellectual institution.

 

The Super Bowl champs finished the 2014 season No. 1 on the ColdHardFootballFacts.com Intelligence Index, our measure of team-wide efficiency in all phases of the game. The Patriots, in other words, were the smartest team in the NFL.

 

Smart football is core curriculum at the University of Foxboro, where the Patriots may not always be the most talented team in the NFL but usually are among the brightest. We began tracking team intellect in 2004. Since then, the Patriots have finished No. 1 on the Intelligence Index in 2004, ’10 and ’14.

 

No coincidence that the Patriots won Super Bowls in 2004 and ’14 and were a dominant 14-2 team in ’10. The Patriots since 2004 finished in the top six on the Intelligence Index every year except for the doomed ’05 season and the Tom Brady-less ’08 campaign.

 

The Intelligence Index is simply a measure of how well teams play in situational football in all phases of the game. It gauges special teams proficiency, field position, third- and fourth-down success, red-zone success, penalties and turnover differential, among other factors, and tells us how efficiently teams and their opponents score points.

 

Defensively, smart, efficient teams make opponents work hard to score points — they bend but don’t break, in other words.

 

We call it Bendability. Offensively, smart, efficient teams convert few yards into a lot of points. We call it Scoreability. The Intelligence Index combines the two factors.

 

Take a look at the C-student Steelers, No. 18 on the 2014 Intelligence Index. They generated 731 more yards of offense last year than the Patriots — but scored 32 fewer points.

 

The stupid Saints, meanwhile, finished No. 25 on the Intelligence Index, largely because of gross inefficiency on offense. Drew Brees & Co. produced 293 more yards of offense than the Patriots, yet parlayed all that production into just 370 points — 98 fewer than the Patriots.

 

The Steelers and Saints, in other words, had plenty of physical talent. But those teams did not have the mental talent to convert all that production into points.

 

The teacher’s-pet Patriots consistently win games other teams lose because they do all the smart, little things well. Take, for example, the Patriots’ Week 16 battle last season over the class-clown Jets.

 

New York outgained the Patriots, 307-231, in total yards, 116-85 on the ground, and 191-146 through the air. The Jets were the better team physically, averaging 5.0 yards per play to just 3.7 for the Patriots. But the Patriots eked out a 17-16 victory because they were the better team mentally.

 

The Patriots converted 6-of-13 third downs (46 percent); the Jets 5-of-13 (38 percent). The Patriots returned three punts for an average of 21.0 yards; the Jets returned three punts for an average of 11.7 yards. The Patriots netted 45.6 yards per punt; the Jets 31.5 yards.

 

The Patriots scored two TDs in four trips to the red zone; the Jets scored zero TDs in three trips there. Patriots kicker Stephen Gostkowski nailed his only field goal attempt; Jets kicker Nick Folk hit three field goals but missed his final go-ahead attempt late in the fourth quarter when the ball was partially blocked.

 

The dumb Jets, in other words, did all the little things wrong and lost a game they physically won; the smart Patriots did all the little things right and won a game they physically lost.

 

That game was a perfect microcosm of the difference between the Patriots and Jets in recent years, and much of it comes down to the coach.

 

The Intelligence Index is, at the end of the day, a measure of coaching. Smart teams are well-coached teams. Dumb teams are poorly coached teams. The poorly coached Jets fired Rex Ryan after finishing the season No. 30 on the Intelligence Index.

 

Professor Belichick and the valedictorian Patriots marched off the field in Arizona a month later with a fourth Lombardi Trophy in hand — again winning a game that less studious teams would have lost.

 

The talented Seattle Seahawks (No. 10 on the Intelligence Index) dominated the Super Bowl physically, averaging 7.5 yards per play to just 5.2 for the Patriots.

 

But the more mentally proficient Patriots won the game, 28-24, making smart plays at critical moments and proving that victory in the NFL is often a matter of brains over brawn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The talented Seattle Seahawks (No. 10 on the Intelligence Index) dominated the Super Bowl physically, averaging 7.5 yards per play to just 5.2 for the Patriots.   But the more mentally proficient Patriots won the game, 28-24, making smart plays at critical moments and proving that victory in the NFL is often a matter of brains over brawn.

 

Ummmm, the Patriots won because of one bone-head play call by Tom Shane's boo Darrell Bevell, not because of anything the Pats did. The Seahawks lost the Super Bowl, the Pats were the beneficiary. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ummmm, the Patriots won because of one bone-head play call by Tom Shane's boo Darrell Bevell, not because of anything the Pats did. The Seahawks lost the Super Bowl, the Pats were the beneficiary. 

 

Yep

 

That's what really made it so infuriating 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ummmm, the Patriots won because of one bone-head play call by Tom Shane's boo Darrell Bevell, not because of anything the Pats did. The Seahawks lost the Super Bowl, the Pats were the beneficiary. 

 

Absolutely a bad play call, no doubt about it.  But it was great work by the Patriots and a spectacular play by Butler, to wit:

 

- Pats ran the same play in practice during SB week, with Jimmy G burning Butler with a TD pass to Josh Boyce playing the Ricardo Lockette role.

- Pats coaches can be seen on the sideline before the play frantically sending Butler onto the field at the last minute when they sense the play taking shape.

- 109 passes from the 1 yard line last season.  Butler had the only INT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely a bad play call, no doubt about it.  But it was great work by the Patriots and a spectacular play by Butler, to wit:

 

- Pats ran the same play in practice during SB week, with Jimmy G burning Butler with a TD pass to Josh Boyce playing the Ricardo Lockette role.

- Pats coaches can be seen on the sideline before the play frantically sending Butler onto the field at the last minute when they sense the play taking shape.

- 109 passes from the 1 yard line last season.  Butler had the only INT.

 

:hand:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the conceit here is that efficiency on third down and in the red zone is the product of Ph.D.s in footballogy, and not of a Hall of Fame quarterback? Cool story bro

 

Well they were sooo smart to know before they drafted Brady in the sixth round that he would turn into one of the all-time greats. Any Pats fan will tell you this. 

 

Duh. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely a bad play call, no doubt about it.  But it was great work by the Patriots and a spectacular play by Butler, to wit:

 

- Pats ran the same play in practice during SB week, with Jimmy G burning Butler with a TD pass to Josh Boyce playing the Ricardo Lockette role.

- Pats coaches can be seen on the sideline before the play frantically sending Butler onto the field at the last minute when they sense the play taking shape.

- 109 passes from the 1 yard line last season.  Butler had the only INT.

And if Wilson leads him a foot more it's either a game winning TD or Lynch runs it in on the next play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?!!??!? EVERYBODY KNOWS BILL BELICHICK MIND****ED RUSSELL WILSON INTO MAKING A TERRIBLE THROW... NO ONE DENIES THIS!!!

I always forget to add the Bellichickian factor into rational commen sense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This article: Exhibit A on how to completely **** up statistical analysis. 

 

Next, he'll write an article about why, according to his mind-bending ("bendability", he may call it) statistical analysis, goat piss actually comes from koalas.

 

Yeah.... well... you don't know that it doesn't!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?!!??!? EVERYBODY KNOWS BILL BELICHICK MIND****ED RUSSELL WILSON INTO MAKING A TERRIBLE THROW... NO ONE DENIES THIS!!!

The real reason was the Hawks didn't want that crotch grabbing beast Lynch to be the SB hero.. :animal0029:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And if Wilson leads him a foot more it's either a game winning TD or Lynch runs it in on the next play.

And if Wilson's Hail Mary to Kearse is a foot shorter, the ball falls incomplete and the Seahawks aren't even close enough to the goal line to be second guessed, and if Butler breaks on the ball a fraction of a second later, it is a touchdown anyway, and if my aunt had balls she'd be my uncle, etc, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And if Wilson's Hail Mary to Kearse is a foot shorter, the ball falls incomplete and the Seahawks aren't even close enough to the goal line to be second guessed, and if Butler breaks on the ball a fraction of a second later, it is a touchdown anyway, and if my aunt had balls she'd be my uncle, etc, etc.

 

 

Not if her name was Kaitlyn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And if Wilson's Hail Mary to Kearse is a foot shorter, the ball falls incomplete and the Seahawks aren't even close enough to the goal line to be second guessed, and if Butler breaks on the ball a fraction of a second later, it is a touchdown anyway, and if my aunt had balls she'd be my uncle, etc, etc.

What does that have to do with? Point was all the nonsense about the Pats would be totally different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What does that have to do with? Point was all the nonsense about the Pats would be totally different.

 

If the Patriots lost the SB instead of won, then all the nonsense about them winning the SB would be totally different?  OK, point taken. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's impressive is elite quarterbacks make everyone around them look better - including coaches.

 

yeah but belichick should get credit for finding guys like gronk, edelman, welker, hernandez, lafell - some of those guys were nobodies - and bringing in guys like Moss when people thought he was finished.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no

 

belicheat has screwed all the pats* fans for life

 

they have no bragging rights, he will go into the HOF with a fist full of rings because the NFL won't kill the golden goose and admit the titles are tainted

 

shame on all of them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...