nyjbuddy Posted April 28, 2016 Share Posted April 28, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Be_a_Jet Posted April 28, 2016 Share Posted April 28, 2016 On March 27, 2016 at 11:01 AM, CrazyCarl40 said: WR could be in play, if that WR was the BPA, but that's not going to be the case. I think the opposite is the case. The whole premise of even picking a WR is because it is very very possible the top 1-2 WR's will be available. Otherwise we would certainly not go actively pursuing a wideout. As opposed to picking the 3rd,4th, or even 5th best option of a certain position group we might pick a WR because they are the best value. Im not saying that WR will certainly be BPA but it is definitely likely - something for Jets to consider. Its actually why Jets play an important role in the draft because they pick right before the row of teams (bengals, vikings, and someone else i can't remember) who need a WR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyLV Posted April 28, 2016 Share Posted April 28, 2016 On 4/12/2016 at 0:37 PM, Adoni Beast said: With this regime every position is in play in the draft. Mac is true to his best available player gameplan, as seen last year. Not true really. Not enough data. The pick of Leonard Williams was not a BPA situation, it was a situation where a player from the elite tier fell to them and that is the key. He was in an entirely different tier. Within the same tier need comes into play Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangers9 Posted April 28, 2016 Share Posted April 28, 2016 Supposedly the Bengals and a few other teams might we willing to trade up because they love Doctson. But if we select him at 20 (if interest I'd trade down) it would be a good choice. Many have him as the best receiver in this draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyCarl40 Posted April 28, 2016 Share Posted April 28, 2016 WR is a smokescreen to get one of the Vikings, Texans, or Bengals or any other WR starved team to jump. Trading down to get back a 3rd or 4th would be fine by me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augustiniak Posted April 28, 2016 Share Posted April 28, 2016 2 hours ago, CrazyCarl40 said: WR is a smokescreen to get one of the Vikings, Texans, or Bengals or any other WR starved team to jump. Trading down to get back a 3rd or 4th would be fine by me. exactly what i was thinking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rscarls Posted April 28, 2016 Share Posted April 28, 2016 On 4/8/2016 at 6:53 PM, Colgateman said: good. he is a great player and would want. I guess so, maybe not 20 tho maybe round 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.