Tinstar Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 Let me begin this by saying I would have taken Leonard Williams last yr at the pick we got him and twice on Sunday because he was the BPA and that's what you do. With that said, I wonder what might have been if this team taken Gurley last yr and then taken Treadwell and Hackenberg this year . That is all . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nj meadowlands Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 Nice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 Gurley should have been the pick RB position locked down for years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChuckkieB Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 7 minutes ago, joewilly12 said: Gurley should have been the pick RB position locked down for years. Completely agree. Williams is a good player but Gurley......damn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 RB's are incredibly risky. Sure, in hindsight Gurley would look like a great pick right now. But he has an injury history. And many RB's don't end up staying on the team that drafted them beyond their rookie deal. So would you rather have Leonard Williams, who should have a long and successful career? Or would you rather have Gurley for, potentially, only 4-5 years? Tough call. Gurley could be a "transcendent" RB on the level of Adrian Peterson, but there's been far too many failures at the RB position, and in a passing league, spending an early 1st on one is dangerous. I do not, for instance, envy the Cowboys when they took Elliott at 4. Even if he is a top 5 RB as early as this year, that's not worth a top 5 pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 Only stupid sh*tty teams take RB's in the first round, let alone the top 10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ex-Rex Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 And what happens when the Jets lose Mo Wilkerson? Gurley ain't gonna fill those shoes, but Williams will. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 14 minutes ago, JiF said: Only stupid sh*tty teams take RB's in the first round, let alone the top 10. Gurley might help me win my fantasy championship next year... but he's not helping the Rams win dick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage69 Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 20 minutes ago, Jetsfan80 said: RB's are incredibly risky. Sure, in hindsight Gurley would look like a great pick right now. But he has an injury history. And many RB's don't end up staying on the team that drafted them beyond their rookie deal. So would you rather have Leonard Williams, who should have a long and successful career? Or would you rather have Gurley for, potentially, only 4-5 years? Tough call. Gurley could be a "transcendent" RB on the level of Adrian Peterson, but there's been far too many failures at the RB position, and in a passing league, spending an early 1st on one is dangerous. I do not, for instance, envy the Cowboys when they took Elliott at 4. Even if he is a top 5 RB as early as this year, that's not worth a top 5 pick. +1 How many RB's are the reason a team got to and won a Bowl?? Other then Terrell Davis I don't know of any.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyCarl40 Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 Seven running backs ran for more than 1,000 yards last season. There were double digit running backs to accomplish the same for every year going back to 2002. It's a different game now. The days of the bell cow, 3-down back are waning. There is no sense in drafting one high unless it's an other worldly talent like AP. Gurley is good but he's no AP. There is more value to drafting a solid running back in the 3rd/4th/5th rounds than ever before. Drafting one in the first round, nevertheless the top ten is a fool's errand. Which is why Jerry Jones did it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 9 minutes ago, CrazyCarl40 said: Seven running backs ran for more than 1,000 yards last season. There were double digit running backs to accomplish the same for every year going back to 2002. It's a different game now. The days of the bell cow, 3-down back are waning. There is no sense in drafting one high unless it's an other worldly talent like AP. Gurley is good but he's no AP. There is more value to drafting a solid running back in the 3rd/4th/5th rounds than ever before. Drafting one in the first round, nevertheless the top ten is a fool's errand. Which is why Jerry Jones did it. You forgot to mention of those 7, 1 went to the playoffs. As great as Gurley was, he did nothing to improve that offense. The Rams were 29th in pts and dead last in yards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augustiniak Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 6 minutes ago, JiF said: You forgot to mention of those 7, 1 went to the playoffs. As great as Gurley was, he did nothing to improve that offense. The Rams were 29th in pts and dead last in yards. which is why they traded all those picks for goff, for better or worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Il Mostro Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 3 hours ago, Tinstar said: Let me begin this by saying I would have taken Leonard Williams last yr at the pick we got him and twice on Sunday because he was the BPA and that's what you do. With that said, I wonder what might have been if this team taken Gurley last yr and then taken Treadwell and Hackenberg this year . That is all . Inside of Gurly's knee closely resembles machaca con huevos in week 1 if the Jets pick him. We would be hearing there's doubt whether he's going to be ready for 2016 training camp due to extended rehab. It's the Jets, you know. This is why we only take defensive players in the first round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BroadwayJoe12 Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 What might have been: Leonard goes onto have an all-pro career and Gurley either ends up on a different team, because who wants to give a running back his second contract at that type of money, or we're stupid enough to give him that second contract. Different game. Take the potential all-pro dlineman over the potential all-pro RB any day of the week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 3 hours ago, joewilly12 said: Gurley should have been the pick RB position locked down for years. Yeah 5, max....You draft a DL with Williams' quality and youth - you're looking at a decade+ starter at a big money position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 4 hours ago, joewilly12 said: Gurley should have been the pick RB position locked down for years. I know you're old, Dude, but the days of RBs winning Heismans and getting drafted in the top five or ten are (or should be) long gone. It's a different game. The Jets signed Forte for three years, $12M. That's what a top RB is worth years down the road, how unlikely it'll be that Gurley or Elliot is worth their fifth year option. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet Nut Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 6 hours ago, Tinstar said: Let me begin this by saying I would have taken Leonard Williams last yr at the pick we got him and twice on Sunday because he was the BPA and that's what you do. With that said, I wonder what might have been if this team taken Gurley last yr and then taken Treadwell and Hackenberg this year . That is all . And resign Mo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet Nut Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 6 hours ago, joewilly12 said: Gurley should have been the pick RB position locked down for years. You mean if he fully recovered, he more than likely locks down the position for 3-5 years. Williams can lock his position down for years and year and years. You get much more for your pick with anyone not playing the RB position Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.