Jump to content

10 WORST SUPER BOWL-WINNING QBS article with suprise picks.


Kleckineau

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, JoeC36 said:

Guys we do have an ignore button that we've been meaning to test. Can you put each other on ignore and let me know if the button works?

 

Thanks

Content is king. Discussion forum content is discussion-based. Not ignore-based.

Putting a person on ignore doesn't solve the problem of having one person drag his anal glands across every thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, nyjunc said:

the proof is in the posts, you have been wrong the entire thread and you like to deflect.

giphy.gif

 

 

poor guy had Marshall Faulk and Marvin Harrison as a rookie then Edge, Wayne, Clark, etc...  he had top 5 talent around him(and that's being kind) his entire career.  he was an all time great QB in the reg season but mediocre at best in postseason.

Yes because all you need is one WR and a RB. You don't need a TE(Dallas Clark was not special), or a half decent defense to win. The Colts were made to win in the regular season. They could not play from defense from behind, or against a team that could take out their #1 receiver, and force Marshall in to block. The proof was what happened the year Peyton was injured. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, NYs Stepchild said:

Yes because all you need is one WR and a RB. You don't need a TE(Dallas Clark was not special), or a half decent defense to win. The Colts were made to win in the regular season. They could not play from defense from behind, or against a team that could take out their #1 receiver, and force Marshall in to block. The proof was what happened the year Peyton was injured. 

Dallas Clark was an outstanding TE.  the Ds were more than good enough, what was the problem? Peyton under pressure in january.  Brady's Ds have allowed more PPG in postseason than Manning's yet he has 4 SBs and manning 2(both of which his D's did the heavy lifting).

the year Peyton was hurt they tanked for Luck.  The proof was this year where Denver got BETTER when Peyton was out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, PatsFanTX said:

 

 

Do you watch football?

 

junc is 100% correct, Johnson and Dilfer were very good QB's the year they won the Super Bowl.

Dilfer made the playoffs w/ 2 different teams and if he had one more game in Seattle it would have been 3 different teams.  Johnson made the playoffs with 3 different teams including the Redskins,  This notion that these QBs sucked is false.  No they were not Brady, Marino, manning or any great QB but they were solid QBs that helped those teams win SBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, PatsFanTX said:

 

 

Do you watch football?

 

junc is 100% correct, Johnson and Dilfer were very good QB's the year they won the Super Bowl.

actually no he doesn't he just watches the Jets then trolls people

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dilfer made the playoffs w/ 2 different teams and if he had one more game in Seattle it would have been 3 different teams.  Johnson made the playoffs with 3 different teams including the Redskins,  This notion that these QBs sucked is false.  No they were not Brady, Marino, manning or any great QB but they were solid QBs that helped those teams win SBs.

I agree with you on this, but disagree that Sanchez was any better than either of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...