ylekram Posted July 27, 2016 Share Posted July 27, 2016 Just now, Sperm Edwards said: If you say so. Anyway the whole thread is about schedules. if you don't believe me, go to my quote just before the one you responded to. see for yourself Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted July 27, 2016 Share Posted July 27, 2016 29 minutes ago, ylekram said: if you don't believe me, go to my quote just before the one you responded to. see for yourself Yes I read it back at the time. If I responded to you alone instead of quoting both of you, it is a minor sticking point. The thread is all schedule(s) he's faced, while effectively getting credit for facing even close to normal opposition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ylekram Posted July 27, 2016 Share Posted July 27, 2016 28 minutes ago, Sperm Edwards said: Yes I read it back at the time. If I responded to you alone instead of quoting both of you, it is a minor sticking point. The thread is all schedule(s) he's faced, while effectively getting credit for facing even close to normal opposition. so because I posted in a schedule based thread, my comment had to be about the schedule? that's just a minor sticking point? like I said earlier, you missed the point completely. nothing has changed. either that or you are just breaking my balls Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted July 27, 2016 Share Posted July 27, 2016 10 hours ago, ylekram said: so because I posted in a schedule based thread, my comment had to be about the schedule? that's just a minor sticking point? like I said earlier, you missed the point completely. nothing has changed. either that or you are just breaking my balls Stop. You categorized the idea of their schedules being the same as intelligent (by inference, as the poster saying so is therefore intelligent). And you (both) did so in a thread about his easy (actually a comparatively non-competitive) schedule. Dont worry. I'm sure he'll show up and we can continue the fantasy where wins are due to being Fitzpatrick-led, but losses aren't Fitz-led; those are team losses with plenty of blame to go around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crusher Posted July 27, 2016 Share Posted July 27, 2016 13 hours ago, Rangers9 said: I thought you were a mod and you talk to posters like that. It's normal for the mods to assume everyone has penis in their mouths. It's mandatory in the mod lounge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangers9 Posted July 27, 2016 Share Posted July 27, 2016 24 minutes ago, The Crusher said: It's normal for the mods to assume everyone has penis in there mouths. It's mandatory in the mod lounge. Say what you want to say. It contradicts what is said in the banning post. It's unacceptable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangers9 Posted July 27, 2016 Share Posted July 27, 2016 2 minutes ago, The Crusher said: I like you. You got spunk. I tell you what. Being on this board is no big deal to me. I can leave anytime. No problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crusher Posted July 27, 2016 Share Posted July 27, 2016 Just now, Rangers9 said: I tell you what. Being on this board is no big deal to me. I can leave anytime. No problem. I for one hope you stay. I will reach out to sperm and try to see if I can keep him from spouting off in an unpleasant direction on the board . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted July 27, 2016 Share Posted July 27, 2016 12 minutes ago, Rangers9 said: I tell you what. Being on this board is no big deal to me. I can leave anytime. No problem. Oh lighten up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Blocker Posted July 27, 2016 Share Posted July 27, 2016 Can we sing the Barney song now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ylekram Posted July 27, 2016 Share Posted July 27, 2016 2 hours ago, Sperm Edwards said: Stop. You categorized the idea of their schedules being the same as intelligent (by inference, as the poster saying so is therefore intelligent). And you (both) did so in a thread about his easy (actually a comparatively non-competitive) schedule. Dont worry. I'm sure he'll show up and we can continue the fantasy where wins are due to being Fitzpatrick-led, but losses aren't Fitz-led; those are team losses with plenty of blame to go around. ok. I am convinced that you are busting my balls. nobody could be this thick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cant wait Posted July 27, 2016 Share Posted July 27, 2016 10 minutes ago, ylekram said: ok. I am convinced that you are busting my balls. nobody could be this thick Maybe if you could make a coherent point you wouldn't need to whine so much about people not understanding Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drdetroit Posted July 27, 2016 Share Posted July 27, 2016 Why are we supposed to care about what Fitz did on another team 4-5 years ago? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted July 27, 2016 Share Posted July 27, 2016 1 hour ago, drdetroit said: Why are we supposed to care about what Fitz did on another team 4-5 years ago? By 4-5 years ago you mean the 2 most recent NFL seasons? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ex-Rex Posted July 27, 2016 Share Posted July 27, 2016 On 7/26/2016 at 10:14 AM, slats said: Decided to make this its own thread. I came up with these numbers very simply, giving Fitz won/loss credit for the games he appeared in with the Texans in 2014 vs. the ones he didn't. Feel free to parse it further. We've spoken a lot about the Jets easy schedule last year, and that's been countered with how well Fitzpatrick performed the year before with the Texans - when he faced an even easier schedule! He was 6-6 against a .437 winning percentage schedule. Teams he actually beat? A winning percentage of .240. Ironically, the only team he beat that year who had a winning record were the 9-7 Buffalo Bills. The Texans overall were 9-7 that year, going 3-1 without Fitz in the lineup, beating the 10-5-1 Bengals, and the 10-6 Ravens along the way. This guy beats bottom feeders. It's what he does. He takes what he's given, and nothing more. I understand hating Geno, but the idea that Fitzpatrick is potentially a postseason/championship QB is ridiculous. I totally agree, but the Jets other option is a QB who will get the team no more than five-six wins this season. Fitz may be able to get nine-10 wins, but doubtful Jets make the playoffs unless the defense carries it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.