joewilly12 Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 Drafting a Texas Tech QB. What could go wrong? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted January 11, 2017 Author Share Posted January 11, 2017 6' 3" 229 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fibonacci Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 New York Daily News was showing this guy as a target for Giants in 2nd round. 6th a little too high for him or am I wrong? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted January 11, 2017 Author Share Posted January 11, 2017 2 minutes ago, Fibonacci said: New York Daily News was showing this guy as a target for Giants in 2nd round. 6th a little too high for him or am I wrong? Fib we need a QB we reached for Hack and he never saw the field this kid is 100x better than Hack. Forget Watson,Kizer,Trubiskythey will be gone by the time we pick 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 Just now, joewilly12 said: Fib we need a QB we reached for Hack and he never saw the field this kid is 100x better than Hack. ^^^ Wash, rinse, repeat for the next 2 years... minimum??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangers9 Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 I don't want another project. And I'm tired of drafting them every year. We can get a vet Qb out of free agency for free who will be game ready to play. We have to spend these picks on the infrastructure. I trade back with the overall 6 and draft two good players with that choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoJoTownsell1 Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 He'll be there at 6. He will be there at 26, he may even be there at 36. What's the point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadaSteve Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 True... He'll also be there at 6 when we pick in the 2nd round, and possibly at 6 when we draft in the 3rd round too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted January 11, 2017 Author Share Posted January 11, 2017 5 minutes ago, JoJoTownsell1 said: He'll be there at 6. He will be there at 26, he may even be there at 36. What's the point? The point is the Jets need a QB without a QB nothing else matters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted January 11, 2017 Author Share Posted January 11, 2017 2 minutes ago, CanadaSteve said: True... He'll also be there at 6 when we pick in the 2nd round, and possibly at 6 when we draft in the 3rd round too. Doubt it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadaSteve Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 1 minute ago, joewilly12 said: Doubt it. I would bet he will be available at 38 when we pick. 70 could be a stretch. It will all depend on what we do in FA. IF we were to go after Tyrod or Glennon, we won't be picking Mahomes in the 1st or 2nd, that's for sure! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted January 11, 2017 Author Share Posted January 11, 2017 3 minutes ago, CanadaSteve said: I would bet he will be available at 38 when we pick. 70 could be a stretch. It will all depend on what we do in FA. IF we were to go after Tyrod or Glennon, we won't be picking Mahomes in the 1st or 2nd, that's for sure! Very true we sign Taylor or Glennon and then the Giants will draft him and he will turn out to be a superstar and win them multiple Super Bowls its how it works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetFreak89 Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 Seriously? Was expecting much more from that highlight tape. 95% of his trows were to receivers without any defenders in a 10 yard radius. He also holds the ball in one hand, at waist level both inside the pocket AND passed the line of scrimmage when he takes off. The only record he would be breaking is whatever fumble record that Sanchez or Geno hold. I'd take him maybe in the 4th or 5th round.....maybe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted January 11, 2017 Author Share Posted January 11, 2017 3 minutes ago, JetFreak89 said: Seriously? Was expecting much more from that highlight tape. 95% of his trows were to receivers without any defenders in a 10 yard radius. He also holds the ball in one hand, at waist level both inside the pocket AND passed the line of scrimmage when he takes off. The only record he would be breaking is whatever fumble record that Sanchez or Geno hold. I'd take him maybe in the 4th or 5th round.....maybe. He hits WR's and completes passes unlike the guy we drafted last year in the 2nd round who i hope to God turns out to the real deal but nothing gives me hope. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 Watching that first video my initial impression is "Man UTEP sucks!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DetroitRed Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 Another bad 2nd round pickSent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tfine Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 He hits WR's and completes passes unlike the guy we drafted last year in the 2nd round who i hope to God turns out to the real deal but nothing gives me hope. Enough already. The guy hasn't even started an NFL game yet. Give it a rest. Sent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted January 11, 2017 Author Share Posted January 11, 2017 10 minutes ago, tfine said: Enough already. The guy hasn't even started an NFL game yet. Give it a rest. Sent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile app Enough already? Hmm I'm using Hack as a tool for a debate that we need a QB until the Jets secure a QB nothing else matters. So you are ok with going into next season with Hack and Petty as the only QB's on the roster? lets hear your plan Mr/Mrs Enough Already......... Other have started threads for Watson,kizer and Mayfield and have ridiculed Hack have you told them enough already? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warfish Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 If he'll be there at 6, why not just trade up to #1 and get him, just to be sure. What could go wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derp Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 This would be fun. Seems like a clean prospect with tools and a knack for playing the position but raw. No proven QB on the roster yet. Would be especially fun in the second round. I kind of hope Watson, Trubisky, Kizer, and Mahomes all end up going in the top 10 of the draft though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted January 11, 2017 Author Share Posted January 11, 2017 Just now, Warfish said: If he'll be there at 6, why not just trade up to #1 and get him, just to be sure. What could go wrong. If your going to trade up to #1 you take Watson...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinstar Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 He'll probably be there at 6 in the 5th round also. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 5 minutes ago, joewilly12 said: Enough already? Hmm I'm using Hack as a tool for a debate that we need a QB until the Jets secure a QB nothing else matters. So you are ok with going into next season with Hack and Petty as the only QB's on the roster? lets hear your plan Mr/Mrs Enough Already......... Other have started threads for Watson,kizer and Mayfield and have ridiculed Hack have you told them enough already? Hack and Petty as only QBs on the roster > Brandon Shell as only T on the roster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted January 11, 2017 Author Share Posted January 11, 2017 3 minutes ago, #27TheDominator said: Hack and Petty as only QBs on the roster > Brandon Shell as only T on the roster Agree the OL is an issue as well. In Macc we trust. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peebag Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 we already have this qb on the team. his name is Bryce Petty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 46 minutes ago, JetFreak89 said: Seriously? Was expecting much more from that highlight tape. 95% of his trows were to receivers without any defenders in a 10 yard radius. He also holds the ball in one hand, at waist level both inside the pocket AND passed the line of scrimmage when he takes off. The only record he would be breaking is whatever fumble record that Sanchez or Geno hold. I'd take him maybe in the 4th or 5th round.....maybe. The Big 12 doesnt know you're allowed to play Defense. It's the most ridiculous conference in the NCAA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet Nut Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 Theres an obvious reason why he'll be there at 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerfish Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 11 minutes ago, JiF said: The Big 12 doesnt know you're allowed to play Defense. It's the most ridiculous conference in the NCAA. Further to your point, Big 12 schools and their national defensive rankings out of 128 teams. 51 - Kansas State 73 - TCU 74 - West Virginia 81 - Baylor 82 - Oklahoma 92 - Oklahoma State 94 - Texas 102 - Iowa State 109 - Kansas 128 - Texas Tech You won't mistake any of these teams with Alabama. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
detectivekimble Posted January 11, 2017 Share Posted January 11, 2017 2 hours ago, RutgersJetFan said: Drafting a Texas Tech QB. What could go wrong? Mahomes to Amaro. The future of the NY Jets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted January 11, 2017 Author Share Posted January 11, 2017 1 hour ago, peebag said: we already have this qb on the team. his name is Bryce Petty. Did you happen to see Bryce Petty in 2016? We didn't see any of Hackenberg. You're right we don't need a QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeremy2020 Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 He'll probably be there at 36 too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Persiussa Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 Never scout from highlight reels, those arent really worth watching. Not trying to be a jerk by saying that but you'll get more out of watching an 11 minute video where they show every pass play he had in a single game than you will out of a highlight film. You need to see the bad things too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScarletKnight89 Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 3 hours ago, joewilly12 said: Fib we need a QB we reached for Hack and he never saw the field this kid is 100x better than Hack. Forget Watson,Kizer,Trubiskythey will be gone by the time we pick 6 You think all 3 of those QB's will really be gone by the time we pick at 6? I can't see that. I hope you're right though cause I dont really like either of the 3 at pick 6. I'd be interested in Watson or Turbinsky in round 2 but I doubt either will be there. But if thats the case and all 3 are gone when we pick we should have our choice of a real good talent being on the board when we pick then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangerous Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 3 hours ago, joewilly12 said: The point is the Jets need a QB without a QB nothing else matters. they need a qb but it makes no sense for them draft a guy at a significantly high position. and how can they justify picking a guy who has never taken a snap from under center? they had two in petty and geno. also, if this guy can be the starter from his first season then it makes less sense to use a high pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.