detectivekimble Posted February 12, 2017 Author Share Posted February 12, 2017 23 hours ago, Jet Nut said: More than a QB who hasn't played in years and is one hit away from being out of football? False statement. Dallas will get more for Romo than the Jets get for Richardson. You will see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
detectivekimble Posted February 12, 2017 Author Share Posted February 12, 2017 20 hours ago, jack48 said: Nonsense. Romo's spine is made out of matchsticks Yeah, and Richardson is a hot commodity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet Nut Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 2 hours ago, detectivekimble said: False statement. Dallas will get more for Romo than the Jets get for Richardson. You will see. There's probably a fool out there who thinks they'll get lucky. Pray it's not us. I'm saying right now, I'll bet SR easily plays more games moving forward than Tony Romo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack48 Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 5 hours ago, detectivekimble said: Yeah, and Richardson is a hot commodity. regardless. I do not want Romo here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neckdemon Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 On 2/10/2017 at 3:09 PM, Klecko73isGod said: Value wise this is crap. A 26-year-old versatile DT who has the ability to be dominant vs. a broken down 36-year-old QB who has been out for most of the last three years with major injuries. Any GM who would propose this deal should be fired. If you trade Richardson, you use him to move up in the first round to get a franchise QB if you think one is there. Any other move would be a loss for the Jets. Actally you use him to try to move up for miles Garrett. Otherwise you stay put and hope fournette is there at 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
detectivekimble Posted February 12, 2017 Author Share Posted February 12, 2017 6 hours ago, neckdemon said: Actally you use him to try to move up for miles Garrett. Otherwise you stay put and hope fournette is there at 6 With the Jets luck, Fournette will be gone by the time they pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
detectivekimble Posted February 12, 2017 Author Share Posted February 12, 2017 10 hours ago, Jet Nut said: There's probably a fool out there who thinks they'll get lucky. Pray it's not us. I'm saying right now, I'll bet SR easily plays more games moving forward than Tony Romo. There's little doubt in my mind that Richardson will look great on his next team. The Jets will look stupid in a year from now for trading him away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangerous Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 3 hours ago, detectivekimble said: There's little doubt in my mind that Richardson will look great on his next team. The Jets will look stupid in a year from now for trading him away. there's no doubt that sheldon is an immense talent. whatever happened last season was not an indication of how good he can be once he gets past his attitude. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetrider Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 On February 10, 2017 at 0:12 PM, detectivekimble said: What exactly do you think the value is for a DL who just put up 1.5 sacks and is one bong hit away from being banned from football? On February 10, 2017 at 11:44 PM, Jet Nut said: More than a QB who hasn't played in years and is one hit away from being out of football? Romo is one hit away from a full-time wheelchair and detectivekimble is the one doing bong hits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
August Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 That would be a bad trade. We don't need another bandaid at the QB position, we need a long term starter and Romo only has 1 maybe 2 years max left in him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bealeb319 Posted February 13, 2017 Share Posted February 13, 2017 Romo will not be motivated to play here. He will spend more time under barrage from the media than he will do helping this team. He should retire, we should find a top 10 QB Pretty good plan where do you suppose we will find a top 10 qb?Sent from my LG-D850 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
detectivekimble Posted February 13, 2017 Author Share Posted February 13, 2017 3 hours ago, jetrider said: Romo is one hit away from a full-time wheelchair and detectivekimble is the one doing bong hits. No, I don't have green goggles on. I realize that Richardson has little trade value right now and that Mac and Bowles need to find a QB who can play, or they'll both be on the unemployment line soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet Nut Posted February 13, 2017 Share Posted February 13, 2017 4 hours ago, detectivekimble said: No, I don't have green goggles on. I realize that Richardson has little trade value right now and that Mac and Bowles need to find a QB who can play, or they'll both be on the unemployment line soon. SR is a better football player than Romo. Should give you more production. There's no reason to give SR away. None Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetfan13 Posted February 13, 2017 Share Posted February 13, 2017 On 2/10/2017 at 3:21 PM, detectivekimble said: How much do you want to bet that the Cowboys get more for Romo than the Jets get for Richardson? OOOOHHH an internet bet, these always go over so well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thadude Posted February 13, 2017 Share Posted February 13, 2017 18 hours ago, detectivekimble said: There's little doubt in my mind that Richardson will look great on his next team. The Jets will look stupid in a year from now for trading him away. You mean just like how we look brilliant for giving Wilk $100 million yet letting Snacks walk who wanted less than half the money? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thadude Posted February 13, 2017 Share Posted February 13, 2017 6 hours ago, Jet Nut said: SR is a better football player than Romo. Should give you more production. There's no reason to give SR away. None Agree. Romo is done, even if he's not he will last 5 minutes behind our OL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thadude Posted February 13, 2017 Share Posted February 13, 2017 10 hours ago, detectivekimble said: No, I don't have green goggles on. I realize that Richardson has little trade value right now and that Mac and Bowles need to find a QB who can play, or they'll both be on the unemployment line soon. Sign Glennon or Tyrod Taylor and keep Sheldon Richardson. See? That was easy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rammagen Posted February 13, 2017 Share Posted February 13, 2017 no thank you pass because romo is old and bet up and wont last the yr behind our line Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thadude Posted February 13, 2017 Share Posted February 13, 2017 6 hours ago, rammagen said: no thank you pass because romo is old and bet up and wont last the yr behind our line He lasted 5 minutes behind the best OL on the planet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet Nut Posted February 13, 2017 Share Posted February 13, 2017 9 hours ago, thadude said: You mean just like how we look brilliant for giving Wilk $100 million yet letting Snacks walk who wanted less than half the money? 1. Mo didn't get 100 mil 2. Mo has been much better than Snacks. Should make more, Snacks is easier to replace Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet Nut Posted February 13, 2017 Share Posted February 13, 2017 8 hours ago, rammagen said: no thank you pass because romo is old and bet up and wont last the yr behind our line 9 hours ago, thadude said: Agree. Romo is done, even if he's not he will last 5 minutes behind our OL He won't last behind any OL, our OL isn't the problem. Shlt he went down and out with the best OL in front of him. Has played a handful of games in the last two seasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C Mart Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 Ed Werder @Edwerderespn Source says Tony Romo expecting release, not trade, and believes he can start as #NFL QB 2-3 more seasons despite turning 37, injury Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 On 2/10/2017 at 3:09 PM, Klecko73isGod said: Value wise this is crap. A 26-year-old versatile DT who has the ability to be dominant vs. a broken down 36-year-old QB who has been out for most of the last three years with major injuries. Any GM who would propose this deal should be fired. If you trade Richardson, you use him to move up in the first round to get a franchise QB if you think one is there. Any other move would be a loss for the Jets. Holy crap, Romo is 36? I forgot how old he is. When I saw the OP I was thinking meh, but what the hell, the Jets need a QB. Even with injury issue I thought Romo was worth a shot. I forgot how long he's been in NFL. No way that deal makes sense to Jets. Dallas would jump on that trade in a heart beat, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 I would rather just make Sheldon Richardson our QB. Let him compete with Hack for the job lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoadFan Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 8 minutes ago, Maxman said: I would rather just make Sheldon Richardson our QB. Let him compete with Hack for the job lol. Are you sure Hack could beat him out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thadude Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 On February 13, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Jet Nut said: 1. Mo didn't get 100 mil 2. Mo has been much better than Snacks. Should make more, Snacks is easier to replace 1. $90 mil 2. Snacks > Mo last year and moving forward Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thadude Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 On February 13, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Jet Nut said: He won't last behind any OL, our OL isn't the problem. Shlt he went down and out with the best OL in front of him. Has played a handful of games in the last two seasons. Romo is DONE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thadude Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 17 minutes ago, RoadFan said: Are you sure Hack could beat him out? Jim Abbott would beat out Hack in a qb competition He'd probably also give Petty a run for his money Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 1 hour ago, RoadFan said: Are you sure Hack could beat him out? I think Hack would lose the job. But Hack is talented so with Sheldon Richardson at QB there is a glaring weakness at LB. So that is how Hack gets on the field next season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crusher Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 1 hour ago, Maxman said: I would rather just make Sheldon Richardson our QB. Let him compete with Hack for the job lol. This go's quickly from funny to sad when we all realize he has a solid chance to prevail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet Nut Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 On 2/16/2017 at 0:22 PM, thadude said: 1. $90 mil 2. Snacks > Mo last year and moving forward 1. 80+ mil isn't 100+ mil or 90+ mil 2. Snacks never has been and never will be better or more important than Mo. Only a handful of clueless fans would make the argument that a run stuffing NT is better than what Mo doesn't when healthy 3. Would be easier to figure out if you were one of the clueless if we knew what name you used to run around with. Not one of these alialses Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afjetsfan Posted February 18, 2017 Share Posted February 18, 2017 Romo would be a good rental for a couple of years if we had an elite O-line and I'm talking top 1 or 2 in the league. Tony is fragile. Anything less than a top-tier O-line is a waste because he would be on IR the first quarter of the first game. Better to pass on Romo, build an elite O-line through the draft and plug holes through free agency. In a couple of years we would be in the market for a top-tier veteran move since we can't seem to draft a QB worth a sh*t. At a minimum, Mangold needs to be replaced with first round talent and our LT needs to be filled by an elite player like Ferguson was in his prime. As far as Richardson is concerned, I'm not sure anyone would give much for him. He is too much trouble and not an elite player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.