Deducing the Jets Draft Board, Part 4: Pittsburgh QB Nathan Peterman

[JetNation]

With the NFL combine behind us and the draft just around the corner, mock drafts will be flooding all of your favorite sports sites at an even more ridiculous rate than they have over the past few weeks.

While it’s always fun to sit back and play armchair GM, trying to predict each of your team’s picks, doing so accurately is impossible.

However, that doesn’t mean you can’t do a little bit of digging to give yourself a better idea as to not only who they’re watching right now, but who they’ve had under the microscope for several months.  Luckily for Jets fans, we’ve done the digging on Gang Green, and over the course of the next few weeks will be sharing some names of players the Jets have shown a significant interest it.

This won’t be based on rumors or speculation, but on certain criteria that must be met:

• Did the Jets dispatch members of their scouting department to at least one of the player’s games during the 2016 season?
• Did the Jets dispatch members of their scouting department to at least one of the player’s practices during the 2016 season?
• Did the Jets conduct at least one interview with the player?
• Did the player participate in the Senior Bowl?  (Mike Maccagnan has drafted several senior bowl participants in his first two seasons)
• Does the player fill a need for the Jets?

If all of those questions have a “yes” answer, it’s safe to say the interest shown by the Jets is legitimate, or at least noteworthy.

Previously featured:

Houston Linebacker Tyus Bowser

Wisconsin Running Back Corey Clement

Ole’ Miss Tight End Evan Engram

Today we take a look at University of Pittsburgh quarterback Nathan Peterman whom the Jets reportedly met with yesterday at his pro day according to Kristian Dyer of metro who addressed the Jets meeting with Peterman here.

A 6′ 2” 225 lb native of Jacksonville, Florida, Peterman transferred from Tennessee to Pitt when he was unable to unseat Joshua Dobbs from under center, seeing only spot duty in two seasons as a Volunteer.

At Pitt, Peterman was called on to run a pro-style offense that saw him play from under center (yes, some colleges still do that) where he performed at a high level.  In two full seasons at Pitt, Peterman threw 47 touchdown passes to just 15 interceptions while completing 60% of his passes.  In 26 career starts, Peterman had 14 contests in which he was interception-free, and threw more than 1 interception in a game only twice.

During his time at the Senior Bowl, Peterman caught the attention of several teams with his strong showing, leading one observer to draw a very favorable pro comparison according to MMQB:

Says one evaluator who has studied Peterman extensively: “He reminds me a lot of Kirk Cousins in this sense: He’s not going to blow you away with any of his traits, but he can do everything you need.”

Peterman’s production at Pitt is even that much more impressive when looking at the fact that he didn’t have elite talent around him, but he still managed log some impressive performances against some big-time schools.  Most notably against Clemson, when Peterman threw 5 touchdown passes without an interception en route to a 43-42 thrilling upset over the number 2 ranked Tigers.

There was also a very efficient performance against Penn State in which Peterman carved up the Nittany Lions, going 11-15 with 3 touchdowns and an interception against a team that posted an 11-3 record.

Maturity and character are two words that continually show up on multiple reports from various outlets regarding Peterman who married his long-time girlfriend at 22.

While his footwork can be sloppy at times, Peterman does like to throw the ball down the field as evidenced by his 9.3 YPC average in 2016, and has functional mobility.  Another attribute on display on watching Peterman is his willingness to hang in the pocket and take a big hit while allowing a route to develop.

Currently listed as a 3rd or 4th round prospect, the general feeling seems to be that his pro-style background will help him in transitioning to the NFL, but as is the case with most quarterbacks, he’ll need at least one season of grooming at the pro level.

With comparisons being made to Kirk Cousins and Derek Carr by NFL.com, he could be worth the wait no matter where he ends up.

 

Click here to read the full story...

[AFJF]

Gottta' like the comps being made from NFL.com and scout saying Derek Carr and Kirk Cousins.

[ATX Jetsfan]

I like Peterman. Not sure he will ever be a star, but i think he can be a long time NFL'er. If we dont go QB early(Lets hope not) i would be fine taking him mid rounds. 

[AFJF]

13 minutes ago, ATX Jetsfan said:

I like Peterman. Not sure he will ever be a star, but i think he can be a long time NFL'er. If we dont go QB early(Lets hope not) i would be fine taking him mid rounds. 

Protected the ball and had great numbers w/o great receivers and beat some really good teams. I'd be happy with him as a mid-rounder.

[Integrity28]

On 3/18/2017 at 1:46 PM, Integrity28 said:

If we're taking a QB at #6, it should be Watson.

I'd prefer trading back, accumulate picks, focus on areas of depth in this particular draft - TE, CB, OLB - and add Nathan Peterman or Davis Webb somewhere along the line, in later rounds after we've netted a couple of rookie starters. But... this is what I said to do a couple years ago with either Garrapolo or Tom Savage, and last year with Dak Prescott or Jacoby Brissett. 

So, what do I know.

This ^^^^

[Warfish]

An acceptable choice as a mid-round QB selection.

If we do not go QB at #6 (Trubisky or Watson), then Peterman in a later round would still meet my "draft a QB prospect every year till we find one" mantra.

[AFJF]

6 hours ago, Warfish said:

An acceptable choice as a mid-round QB selection.

If we do not go QB at #6 (Trubisky or Watson), then Peterman in a later round would still meet my "draft a QB prospect every year till we find one" mantra.

Agreed.  All this talk about how picking a QB will mean they've given up on Hack, but it could just mean that until they know they have a legit QB, they're gonna' keep drafting them.  

I have zero issue with that.

[rangerous]

imo peterman would be a good late round choice.  pro set, cold weather, good competition, and can throw the ball.

[varjet]

2 hours ago, rangerous said:

imo peterman would be a good late round choice.  pro set, cold weather, good competition, and can throw the ball.

This is a 3rd or 4th round QB.  

With an exception being Prescott, college spread QBs should be picked lower because they need more development.  

The NFL needs more QB development.  Smart QB prospects will go to schools with pro style offenses.  

Hack is just an odd ball exception to all of this, and we will know more about him by Halloween.  But it would appear at this point that Petty was an enormous reach.   Like Grayson, he could end up unclaimed on the PS.  

[FTL Jet Fan]

I hope we give Peterman serious consideration if we don't take a QB in the first round if that's what the FO decides to do.  I don't think he makes it past the late 2nd round. We have more pressing needs to take him in the 2nd but I would have no problem with this guy in the 3rd. I am probably higher on this guy than most but I think he would be perfect for NY.