Dcronin Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 A CLE-JAX trade, for #4, to get Trubisky, what do we do? Still try to trade back later into round 1, or stay put and take Fournette? Still pretty sure the thing to do in this draft is move back, back, back. DC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoBowles Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 This is impossible, our resident NFL expert says that no team run by Paul DePodesto would ever take Trubiski because our resident expert who is a proven, bonafied QB guru, does not like Trubiski, and he clearly would know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gastineau Lives Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 5 minutes ago, Dcronin said: A CLE-JAX trade, for #4, to get Trubisky, what do we do? Still try to trade back later into round 1, or stay put and take Fournette? Still pretty sure the thing to do in this draft is move back, back, back. DC Titans, 49ers, and us, us, us. Who will win the race to trade down and how awesome of a deal are they going to get? GL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dcronin Posted April 24, 2017 Author Share Posted April 24, 2017 I think Cleveland likes Trubisky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangerous Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 16 minutes ago, Dcronin said: A CLE-JAX trade, for #4, to get Trubisky, what do we do? Still try to trade back later into round 1, or stay put and take Fournette? Still pretty sure the thing to do in this draft is move back, back, back. DC imo the jets should still trade down. they just need too many good players to stand pat. the thing is, i don't know if you see as much trading action if you're not sitting on a qb or edge rusher pick position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetFaninMI Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 20 minutes ago, Dcronin said: A CLE-JAX trade, for #4, to get Trubisky, what do we do? Still try to trade back later into round 1, or stay put and take Fournette? Still pretty sure the thing to do in this draft is move back, back, back. DC If that happens its simple: Pick Watson! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derp Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 My preference would be to trade down unless Garrett is available (he won't be) or Thomas is available (he probably won't be). I don't think Fournette makes sense at this stage of a rebuild unless they're positive Hackenberg is a legitimate 15 year starter and I don't know how that's possible. Otherwise if they do it, they're making the move because Maccagnan does not feel he has job security IMO. Not the right time to add a back for a number of reasons and taking a back in the first is rarely a good idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 Paul DePodesta isn't going to draft Trubisky. He'll draft the most mathematically pure prospects alive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoBowles Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 6 minutes ago, T0mShane said: Paul DePodesta isn't going to draft Trubisky. He'll draft the most mathematically pure prospects alive. Paul DePodesta pees the Fibonacci sequence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warfish Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 55 minutes ago, Dcronin said: A CLE-JAX trade, for #4, to get Trubisky, what do we do? Draft another DT because something something BAP? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gangrene Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 If Casserly's prediction is true he's finally got something right after having been a consultant in the hiring of Mike MacCagnan and Todd Bowles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbatesman Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 20 minutes ago, NoBowles said: Paul DePodesta pees the Fibonacci sequence. @Fibonacci is this true? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mphtrilogy Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 Coughlin aint a spring chicken, hes in win now mode.. he's going fournette, no trade down Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoBowles Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 25 minutes ago, dbatesman said: @Fibonacci is this true? It's absolutely true, Joewilly12 verified it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 Clevelend trading with the Jets here always seemed odd. You'd think Cleveland would want to get ahead of the Jets if they love Trubisky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fibonacci Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 50 minutes ago, dbatesman said: @Fibonacci is this true? Ain't nobody pees my sequence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinstar Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 17 minutes ago, slats said: Clevelend trading with the Jets here always seemed odd. You'd think Cleveland would want to get ahead of the Jets if they love Trubisky. The cost is what will keep the Jets an option . It would cost the Browns less to deal with the Jets who really want to trade down, but would take Trubisky just to prove it because he fits a need for this team . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gen X Jet Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 Other than screwing the Jets 2 years ago, Charley Casserly hasn't been relevant since Dexter Manley and the 'Hogs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadaSteve Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 2 hours ago, Dcronin said: A CLE-JAX trade, for #4, to get Trubisky, what do we do? Still try to trade back later into round 1, or stay put and take Fournette? Still pretty sure the thing to do in this draft is move back, back, back. DC To move back you need a partner. Cleveland was suppose to be said partner. If you can't, I think CB would be the better option, but I don't think the Jets would pass on Fournette. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TuscanyTile2 Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 1 hour ago, NoBowles said: Paul DePodesta pees the Fibonacci sequence. Paul DePodesta uses Avogadro's number in his player evaluations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoBowles Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 Paul DePodesto watching Deshaun Watson throw the football at 49 mph Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetscode1 Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 2 hours ago, NoBowles said: This is impossible, our resident NFL expert says that no team run by Paul DePodesto would ever take Trubiski because our resident expert who is a proven, bonafied QB guru, does not like Trubiski, and he clearly would know. JN has a resident NFL expert? Confused... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 5 minutes ago, NoBowles said: Paul DePodesto watching Deshaun Watson throw the football at 49 mph ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 I'm gonna say that Watson can throw it harder than has been reported. I've never watched him and thought his arm was weak. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitonti Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 Last year the Browns passed on Carson Wentz. Traded him away. he starts hot 4-1. Meanwhile, this year, they've got Cody Kessler and Brock Osweiler 1-2 on the depth chart. But yeah the Browns are dumb and everyone else is smart. Trade down every year, never have the balls to make a pick, that's no way to go through life Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitonti Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 1 hour ago, T0mShane said: I'm gonna say that Watson can throw it harder than has been reported. I've never watched him and thought his arm was weak. he does have a ton of interceptions and his team was friggin stacked. He throws deep but maybe he had to put everything into it and lacked accuracy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TuscanyTile2 Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 Paul Depodesta calculating what it will take to trade up to #6. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dcat Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 2 hours ago, Tinstar said: The cost is what will keep the Jets an option . It would cost the Browns less to deal with the Jets who really want to trade down, but would take Trubisky just to prove it because he fits a need for this team . If Fournette is ther, maybe the Colts want to trade to #6. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thadude Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 Nothing. simply just try to pick the best players Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thadude Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 7 minutes ago, Dcat said: If Fournette is ther, maybe the Colts want to trade to #6. Colts need OL and defense. They got punk'd by Trent Richardson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thadude Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 1 hour ago, bitonti said: he does have a ton of interceptions and his team was friggin stacked. He throws deep but maybe he had to put everything into it and lacked accuracy. Watson is going to be a poor man's Alex Smith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeremy2020 Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 2 hours ago, TuscanyTile2 said: Paul Depodesta calculating what it will take to trade up to #6. weird..he uses the same formula I use to buy toilet paper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogglez Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 1 hour ago, thadude said: Watson is going to be a poor man's Alex Smith Watson's floor is what Vince Young was. His ceiling is what Vince Young could have been. It's funny you gave him the poor man's Alex Smith label, because that is EXACTLY what Trubisky looks like to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsplayer21 Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 I hope teams do pick the qb jokers ahead of us. It almost ensures we get the rb of the decade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetster Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 6 hours ago, Mogglez said: Watson's floor is what Vince Young was. His ceiling is what Vince Young could have been. It's funny you gave him the poor man's Alex Smith label, because that is EXACTLY what Trubisky looks like to me. This is what I don't understand about the Watson bashers? His floor is Vince Young but many said that Young failed because he threw sidearm, was as dumb as a box of rocks, and was not a hard worker. So let's take a look at Watsons attributes relative to Youngs. Both were winners, and found ways to carry their teams. That's where it ends. Watson is also known as very intelligent, a student of the game, driven to get better, and an extremely hard worker & leader. I think Watsons upside is Donavon McNabb & after watching the sh*tshow I've witnessed at QB for this Jets team, if Macc takes Watson his pick I'll be a happy Jet fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.