Lray Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 No it wouldn't. I'd rather we did what they did than take two safeties in a row. It wouldSent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
long suffering jets fan Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 13 minutes ago, Seth said: Except he was ecstatic on Twitter about the pick. Lol He's still ecstatic about being picked 6th last night and playing in New York. When he comes down off his buzz he's going to realize the nightmare he's walking into. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seth Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 1 minute ago, Gastineau Lives said: Chiefs 12 4 0 .750 389 311 6-2-0 6-2-0 W2 Raiders 12 4 0 .750 416 385 6-2-0 6-2-0 L1 Broncos 9 7 0 .563 333 297 5-3-0 4-4-0 W1 Chargers 5 11 0 .313 410 423 3-5-0 2-6-0 L5 Completely irrelevant to the notion that taking back to back players in the same position is automatically bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SayNoToDMC Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 Just now, Sperm Edwards said: I'm still in shock. I don't think it's really hit me that we actually just did this. This stupid ****er doesn't know enough to re-adjust his draft list based on what position he just took? Two safeties. He's literally worse than a free twitter poll the Jets could run, so was Idzik. Neither seem to have a working phone in the draft room Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyCarl40 Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 6 minutes ago, Seth said: Raiders went back to back CB's, where is the bitching? Raiders have a franchise QB and a good team. They can afford to do that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seth Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 Just now, long suffering jets fan said: He's still ecstatic about being picked 6th last night and playing in New York. When he comes down off his buzz he's going to realize the nightmare he's walking into. Well yeah, only playing for the Browns is worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SayNoToDMC Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 1 minute ago, Seth said: Completely irrelevant to the notion that taking back to back players in the same position is automatically bad. You're retarded Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seth Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 Just now, CrazyCarl40 said: Raiders have a franchise QB and a good team. They can afford to do that. And we had the worst secondary in the NFL and we aren't competing next season. We can't afford to do what we did??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthCoastJetsFan Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 Just now, Seth said: Well yeah, only playing for the Browns is worse. Maybe not any more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seth Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 Just now, SayNoToDMC said: You're retarded I'm surprised you spelled "you're" correctly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gastineau Lives Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 1 minute ago, Seth said: Completely irrelevant to the notion that taking back to back players in the same position is automatically bad. Yep, it's totally irrelevant. Records have nothing to do with rosters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greenseed4 Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 16 minutes ago, Patriot Killa said: JamalAdams @TheAdams_era It's not even fair that we're together.....Let's ride bro, welcome home! @alldayMAYE6:49 PM · Apr 28, 2017 REally like this kid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Walrus Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 2 minutes ago, Seth said: I'm surprised you spelled "you're" correctly. To be fair, the spell checker helps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JETSfaninNE Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 6 minutes ago, Sarge4Tide said: 14 picks until us....my Top 20 A Kamara RB JJ SmIth Schuster WR C Godwin WR B Hodges TE D Westbrook WR P Elfien C D Foreman RB T Williams OLB D Feeney OL C Kupp WR D Webb QB N Peterman QB D Dawkins OL Z Cunningham OLB C Awuzie CB C Tankersley CB J Butt TE A Stewart WR A Garcia OL S Perine RB Hope Godwin falls to us so he can reunite with Hackenberg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
long suffering jets fan Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 3 minutes ago, Seth said: Well yeah, only playing for the Browns is worse. Not in 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seth Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 Just now, Gastineau Lives said: Yep, it's totally irrelevant. Records have nothing to do with rosters. Records are irrelevant when the assumption was back to back selections of the same position is atomically bad. I'm not denying the situations are different, but that's not the point I'm making. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pcola Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 1 hour ago, Butterfield said: I dont mind the pick. I wonder if the jets would have taken maye or budda baker had they traded up? They had Mayr in for an official visit. Baker was not. It was reported last week the the FO loved him. I never thought they would double up on safeties. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seth Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 1 minute ago, The Walrus said: To be fair, the spell checker helps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guilhermezmc Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 Tim Williams is on free fall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gastineau Lives Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 Just now, Seth said: Records are irrelevant when the assumption was back to back selections of the same position is atomically bad. I'm not denying the situations are different, but that's not the point I'm making. Well, we are in the position that is called we need help in other areas and later round picks are crapshoots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SayNoToDMC Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 5 minutes ago, Seth said: I'm surprised you spelled "you're" correctly. Give me some credit. It's not like I'd draft 3 strong safties at the top of the draft in 2 years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoop24 Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 3 minutes ago, Guilhermezmc said: Tim Williams is on free fall 24 year old Aaron Maybin with character issues Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Walrus Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 Drew Pearson's box tickets must be up for renewal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 6 minutes ago, SayNoToDMC said: He's literally worse than a free twitter poll the Jets could run, so was Idzik. Neither seem to have a working phone in the draft room Come on, it's totally smart to start two rookie safeties. All the good teams, that win all the superbowls, do that. That's how they built their powerhouse teams: just the way we're doing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guilhermezmc Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 Man, that guy is the goat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyCarl40 Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 7 minutes ago, Seth said: And we had the worst secondary in the NFL and we aren't competing next season. We can't afford to do what we did??? I didn't say that, straw man. You asked about the raiders who took a corner and a safety. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patriot Killa Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 Cowboys just got a good one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt39 Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 Woody doing this on purpose so he can bring Rex back. Only explanation I got. Halfway believable too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gastineau Lives Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 The thing that's killing me is I am trying to find out who the best slot cornerback left in the draft is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adb280z Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 4 minutes ago, Guilhermezmc said: Tim Williams is on free fall Quote WEAKNESSES Scouts say he struggles with Alabama scheme and needs to have things simplified. Can be taken advantage of with screen passes and misdirection. Has sinewy build that resembles a move tight end more than an NFL edge rusher. Arms and chest lack thickness and that shows up in his play strength. Is improving as edge-setter but he still needs work. Would benefit from a stronger initial punch. Athletic tackles with a well-timed punch can stymie his rush plans. Needs to do better job of getting set pre-snap. Has some hip tightness that limits his stride length upfield and laterally. DRAFT PROJECTION Rounds 2-3 SOURCES TELL US "He's like the Predator. When he's allowed to do just one thing -- get the quarterback -- he is really good at it. Don't ask him to do much more than that, though. He's going to be a high-rep player and I don't know if NFL defenses are going to trust him to do more than just rush." -- NFC area scout From NFL.com Wow sounds like he's not too bright. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WEAKNESSES Scouts say he struggles with Alabama scheme and needs to have things simplified. Can be taken advantage of with screen passes and misdirection. Has sinewy build that resembles a move tight end more than an NFL edge rusher. Arms and chest lack thickness and that shows up in his play strength. Is improving as edge-setter but he still needs work. Would benefit from a stronger initial punch. Athletic tackles with a well-timed punch can stymie his rush plans. Needs to do better job of getting set pre-snap. Has some hip tightness that limits his stride length upfield and laterally.
SOURCES TELL US "He's like the Predator. When he's allowed to do just one thing -- get the quarterback -- he is really good at it. Don't ask him to do much more than that, though. He's going to be a high-rep player and I don't know if NFL defenses are going to trust him to do more than just rush." -- NFC area scout
CanadienJetsFan Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 I guess the next pick has to be a quarterback Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Il Mostro Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 If there is a God, D'Onta Foreman will still be available when the Jets pick in the 3rd and they have the good sense to take him. He is a beast and perfect workhorse for a QB-poor team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greenseed4 Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 Feck! I wanted JuJu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seth Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 5 minutes ago, CrazyCarl40 said: I didn't say that, straw man. You asked about the raiders who took a corner and a safety. Which is directly connected to the original point I made about going S back to back picks, so no, it's not a straw man... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KSJets Posted April 29, 2017 Share Posted April 29, 2017 Just now, Il Mostro said: If there is a God, D'Onta Foreman will still be available when the Jets pick in the 3rd and they have the good sense to take him. He is a beast and perfect workhorse for a QB-poor team. That's who I want as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.05f3dc52804d5fd84cf09ccfcd7bd10b.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.