NIGHT STALKER Posted January 22, 2006 Share Posted January 22, 2006 January 22, 2006 -- GOAL LINE STAND Jets: salary plight isn't so bad DESPITE the Jets being a whopping $26 million over the salary cap, GM Terry Bradway told The Post there's no reason to panic. "Within the salary-cap system, there are obviously issues and decisions that have to be made every year, but I am very optimistic that we'll be able to keep all the players that we want to keep," Bradway said. The salary cap is expected to be finalized in the coming weeks and fall somewhere between $92 and $95 million. The Jets' exact cap figure of $118.1 million obviously puts them in jeopardy of retaining any of their big-name players such as DE John Abraham, CB Ty Law and C Kevin Mawae. "The worst thing you can be is a bad team with no cap space," one league source told The Post. "That's a double disaster." The source related the Jets' situation to having an enormous credit-card bill. "You can either pay it all off now or save some for later," he said. "If I were them, I'd do it all now and get it over with." Bradway says no such drastic measures are needed. "Relative to how we build a team, I don't think there's going to be anything that we're not able to do" he said. "I feel pretty confident that the salary cap will not be an issue for us going forward." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted January 22, 2006 Share Posted January 22, 2006 The Jets cap situation has been way overblown. The only real team with Cap problems is the Redskins. There will ofcourse be cuts but there are every year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted January 22, 2006 Share Posted January 22, 2006 The Jets cap situation has been way overblown. How is $26-$30 mil over the cap being "overblown"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted January 22, 2006 Share Posted January 22, 2006 How is $26-$30 mil over the cap being "overblown"? Because a vasy amjority of it is roster bonuses that even if paid do not have an immediate cap impact. They can be spread throughout the contract or up to 4 years (dpending on if a CBA is in place). There will be cuts made and restructures. But after all of that the Jets should be in good shape. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted January 22, 2006 Share Posted January 22, 2006 Because a vasy amjority of it is roster bonuses that even if paid do not have an immediate cap impact. They can be spread throughout the contract or up to 4 years (dpending on if a CBA is in place). There will be cuts made and restructures. But after all of that the Jets should be in good shape. I understand all that. But what is the Jets exact "roster bonus liability"? And again, maybe one or two players will have restructured contracts, but the Jets will not have 10 players restructure. I think you are being a little overly optimistic on the Jets cap situation buddy. :wink: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AFJF Posted January 23, 2006 Share Posted January 23, 2006 I understand all that. But what is the Jets exact "roster bonus liability"? And again, maybe one or two players will have restructured contracts, but the Jets will not have 10 players restructure. I think you are being a little overly optimistic on the Jets cap situation buddy. :wink: Well I think it's a bit foolish to speculate at this point. Once the Jets make whatever moves they're going to make (cuts, restructuring, etc..) we'll know if the cap was a problem if they're unalbe to make upgrades or sign draft picks. Obviously they won't be able to go out and sign three or four marquee free agents but if they can fill some gaps and get their rooks in camp, there's no cap issue. Obviously its far from an ideal situation, but I dont think it's as crippling as some are making it out to be. Time will tell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr nyjet Posted January 23, 2006 Share Posted January 23, 2006 no offense guys, but no jet fan with a functional brain should believe anything dumbway says. i'll bet al davis, carl peterson, and danny snyder have a dead pool going as to who can undress dumbway the most times in signings, trades, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.