nyjunc Posted December 30, 2007 Share Posted December 30, 2007 Noticed that too. Kinda stands out a bit. it does? that's funny b/c I totaled up his '01-'05 #s. Do th math again. LOL, he's been owned so many times in this thread, it'd hilarious. Just give up nyjunc. Here come the morons w/ the "owned" stuff. if you actually read the posts and don't prejudge b/c you hate herm you would see nobody is "owning" me. Stop w/ the nonsese and go back and do the math. Curtis under groh/Parcells(5 years): 1995: 368 carries 1996: 316 1998: 369 1999: 367 2000: 316 1736 carries divided by 5=347.2 Curtis under Herm(5 years) 2001: 333 carries 2002: 261 2003: 323 2004: 371 2005: 220 1508 carries divided by 5= 301.6 Could this be any easier for you guys to understand? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet Moses Posted December 30, 2007 Share Posted December 30, 2007 2001: 333 2002: 261 2003: 323 2004: 371 2005: 220 That's 1508 carries in 5 seasons, 1508 divided by 5 is 301.6. Where did I include 2006 in my #s? Typo, I meant 2005. Martin was injured for most of 2005, and he still got 220 carries. 2003, he had two high ankle sprains and still got 323 carries. That is a disgrace. But anyway, factoring out 2005 because Martin didn't play the entire season, Martin's avg under McEdwards: 322 You know what they say about liars and figures. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyjunc Posted December 30, 2007 Share Posted December 30, 2007 Typo, I meant 2005. Martin was injured for most of 2005, and he still got 220 carries. 2003, he had two high ankle sprains and still got 323 carries. That is a disgrace. But anyway, factoring out 2005 because Martin didn't play the entire season, Martin's avg under McEdwards: 322 You know what they say about liars and figures. In 1998 he played w/ an injury all year, it even forced him to miss a game(I think it was a thigh) and he ran the ball 369 times, 418 times if you include the playoffs. Why shouldn't his '05 #s count? he still played in 12 games, the man always layed through pain. That is what defined his career but it's ok for parcells to play him through pain but not for Herm? Even if you divide the # of carries by game he was STILL used MORE by Parcells. and of course it was a disgrace Curtis playng in '03 but Cut not Curtis playing in 1998 especially onsidering he averaged 4.0 YP in '03 compared to 3.5 in '98 so clearly his injuries were affecting him more in 1998. Let's hear the next excuse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.