Jump to content

Pssssst. Look here. Wet dreamin'


TomShane

Recommended Posts

I'm not sure Matt Leinhert is the answer, actually. Especially when the Jets have so many other holes to fill, like the currently vacated left tackle spot. Getting some youth in the offensive line wouldn't be bad either. You can probably get a QB, while not as successful as Matt, but who has good physical gifts, later in the draft, say a Omar Jacobs.

I guess it depends what people want to do. Would you want to see a rebuilding process, or just a retooling, which is totally possible with this roster. While there are holes, there is a ton of talent. The secondary holes can be filled with experience playing together. The defensive line is just one big (re: good) DT away from being a line that should dominate.

I can't believe we're talking about this in September...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure Matt Leinhert is the answer, actually. Especially when the Jets have so many other holes to fill, like the currently vacated left tackle spot. Getting some youth in the offensive line wouldn't be bad either. You can probably get a QB, while not as successful as Matt, but who has good physical gifts, later in the draft, say a Omar Jacobs.

I guess it depends what people want to do. Would you want to see a rebuilding process, or just a retooling, which is totally possible with this roster. While there are holes, there is a ton of talent. The secondary holes can be filled with experience playing together. The defensive line is just one big (re: good) DT away from being a line that should dominate.

I can't believe we're talking about this in September...

Dude, if you're in position to get Matt Leinart, you take Matt Leinart and worry about OT in round 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dude, if you're in position to get Matt Leinart, you take Matt Leinart and worry about OT in round 2.

I dunno... I just don't think the Jets can afford to take him, after having so much already wrapped up in the QB position. If you want to draft a QB, that's fine. I can go with that. Just not one that's going to cost 60 million dollars to sign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The top pick next season can be turned into 2 number 1's and a few other top picks.

Teams are going to want Leinart bad.

We could probably trade down to the 5 spot or so also getting a number 2, a solid vet, and a number 1 from the 07 draft.

We then use the number 5 pick on Bush, trade the 07 number 1 for Rivers or Brees, and draft oline and DT help the rest of the way.

Jets Rebuilt.

Or we could just take Leinart and be set for a decade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The top pick next season can be turned into 2 number 1's and a few other top picks.

Teams are going to want Leinart bad.

We could probably trade down to the 5 spot or so also getting a number 2, a solid vet, and a number 1 from the 07 draft.

We then use the number 5 pick on Bush, trade the 07 number 1 for Rivers or Brees, and draft oline and DT help the rest of the way.

Jets Rebuilt.

Or we could just take Leinart and be set for a decade.

I like that plan... mostly because with more bullets in the gun, the more times you have to shoot. That and the first pick is going to command so much money, it's just not good for the Jets to lock up that much money in someone else who could be a bust. They already have one bust at QB, why draft another potential bust and have all your eggs wrapped up in the QB position?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...