Jetsfan80 Posted September 27, 2005 Share Posted September 27, 2005 It's time to revisit the topic originally drafted by Tom Shane. Previously, Herm's approval rating was somewhere in the 65 % vicinity, if I am not mistaken. Let's see how that has changed following the first three weeks of this season. Simply vote, then post one of the following: PRO-HERM ANTI-HERM And explain why. My opinion has been well-documented. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetfan13 Posted September 27, 2005 Share Posted September 27, 2005 well you all know I have always been a staunch Herm supporter but... I am beginning to waiver just a little...things don't seem to be right but I am not ready to fire him just yet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green DNA Posted September 27, 2005 Share Posted September 27, 2005 No matter what, I will be rooting for Herm to win every game this year. If that gets him an extension, fine, that will be my deal with the devil. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthernJet Posted September 27, 2005 Share Posted September 27, 2005 ya, leavin miller in after 1st flub and a preseason of flubs was a real seasoned HC move.......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted September 27, 2005 Share Posted September 27, 2005 I am strongly Pro-jets. As I stated all along, I will reserve judgement and decisions on teh FO and staff until after the season. Anyone deserves that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BwanaZulia Posted September 27, 2005 Share Posted September 27, 2005 I know this is going to shock you all.. but... Still pro. The biggest mistake was made during the off season when we didn't shore up the o-line with some more depth. We broke 2 QBs in ONE GAME and have absolutely no running game to mention. I hope Bollywood can run, because he isn't going to sit in the pocket and throw. BZ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted September 27, 2005 Share Posted September 27, 2005 ya, leavin miller in after 1st flub and a preseason of flubs was a real seasoned HC move.......... Look what Bill Parcells did with Meggett. Same thing in Denver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthernJet Posted September 27, 2005 Share Posted September 27, 2005 Look what Bill Parcells did with Meggett. Same thing in Denver. does that make it right,,,herm was wrong,,damn admit it........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GET 2 WORK HEWA Posted September 27, 2005 Share Posted September 27, 2005 Chad wasnt fully recovered yet, therefor he shouldnt have beeen playing... clock management/time out management is disgusting herm's "motivation" tactics can only do so much! anti -Herm.. hopefully we will have a new coach alot sooner than later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetheelz Posted September 27, 2005 Share Posted September 27, 2005 Anti-Herm, no question about it Pro Jets Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted September 27, 2005 Author Share Posted September 27, 2005 We broke 2 QBs in ONE GAME and have absolutely no running game to mention. BZ, the point you are glossing over is that Herm had something to do with us having at least one broken QB. Also, part of the reason we have no running game is because Curtis had 426 carries last year at age 31. Maybe that was Hackett's doing. But I do recall Herm saying before the season that "Curtis gets as many carries as he wants, that's his decision", which is just plain retarded, and shows you why LaMont Jordan and now Derrick Blaylock have been severly under-used. It should have come as no surprise that Curtis has finally hit the wall this year, AND that we were totally unprepared when it happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted September 27, 2005 Share Posted September 27, 2005 BZ, the point you are glossing over is that Herm had something to do with us having at least one broken QB. Also, part of the reason we have no running game is because Curtis had 426 carries last year at age 31. Maybe that was Hackett's doing. But I do recall Herm saying before the season that "Curtis gets as many carries as he wants, that's his decision", which is just plain retarded, and shows you why LaMont Jordan and now Derrick Blaylock have been severly under-used. It should have come as no surprise that Curtis has finally hit the wall this year, AND that we were totally unprepared when it happened. Wait, wait, wait. Where has it been said that Herm is "responsible" for teh Chad injury? What doctor said that, and exactly what was the coaching staff told in relation to teh injury, post surgery, and during the game after he first went out. As well, when did the tear occur? Where was all this published-I haven't seen it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly Posted September 27, 2005 Share Posted September 27, 2005 I am pro herm..........not by much I am not ready to see him fired & insert donnie h in a knee jerk reaction. He is a good d coordinater & should remain there. Don't make the same mistake 2wice if you're anti herm. bring in a guy next year with proper experience. what was dingers input????????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kidhuman Posted September 27, 2005 Share Posted September 27, 2005 ANTI-HERM Never really liked himmuch, and this week-end proved to be the straw that broke the camels back(or should I say Chad's shoulder, and Fiedlers shoulder) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted September 27, 2005 Share Posted September 27, 2005 ANTI - HERM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DHJF Posted September 27, 2005 Share Posted September 27, 2005 I used to be highly PRO, but have recently changed my tune to ANTI. I can no longer ignore the fact he's nothing more than a good motivational speaker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob D Posted September 27, 2005 Share Posted September 27, 2005 I am on the fence. I will support Herm until the end of the season, but he should probably go after that. Regardless of what the sport is, I am a firm believer that a manager/head coach should be given at least five years to prove himself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted September 27, 2005 Share Posted September 27, 2005 ANTI-HERM as though there was any doubt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mudcat21 Posted September 27, 2005 Share Posted September 27, 2005 I've been anti-Hermie for four years now. I have nothing against the guy personally, he seems like a nice guy. I just don't want him as out HC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted September 27, 2005 Share Posted September 27, 2005 I can no longer ignore the fact he's nothing more than a good motivational speaker. Motivational speaker = bullsh*t artist supreme. Words speak larger then actions. Hermy to a T. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted September 28, 2005 Author Share Posted September 28, 2005 Herm approval rating, preseason: 71 % (appx.) Herm approval rating as of 9/27/05: 21 % Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 Herm has yet to learn, that unlike hockey, an overtime loss leads to no gain in the overall standings. Somebody please update/fax Herm regarding this novel concept. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sirlancemehlot Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 I was Pro-Herm until about April. Then the Doug Jolley thing happened and I finally stopped making excuses for all the stupid sh*te he's been talking his way out of for the past few seasons. He's done well and has a good track record, but a good coach knows how to build a team, run a team, coach a team, and manage the games to the benefit of his team. Herm isn't ready for the big-time. He seems to delegate too much and take too little responsibility. Chad going down is Herm's fault on so many levels. He didn't shore-up a very thin and untested offensive line (build a team), he allowed Pennington to set his own schedule and play when he should've sat and healed (run a team). He gave the reigns to Heimerdinger who came in cold to coach an offense that had none of the strengths of his former squad, and sent that offense onto the feild though they were unprepared and simply incapable of succeeding (coach a team). Need I give examples of his game-day screw-ups? I thought not. I've GROWN to be anti-Herm. He's completly flustrated the confidence out of me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bugg Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 Scary thing-between ther freak occurrence of losing 2 QBs ifor the season in a single quarter(giving him a pass to some in the media) and a solid defense(save David Barrett), Edwards will slip by just enough to get brought back. It's a harsh thing to say, but the best thing for the long-term health fo the franchise is for this team to totally tank, get Matt Leinart, dump Edwards and start fresh. But the defense is good enough to eke out 4-5 more wins. This team doesn't get competitive again until the "Waiting for Pennington" act is over and Martin retires or is gone somehow. The offense has to be totally overhauled, ANd Edwards is too stupid and loyal to the old guys to do that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.