Smizzy Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 Today.... Lamont Jordan-26- 126-1TD/4-22 Rec Curtis Martin-13-30-0Td / 3-15 YTD... Lamont Jordan-75-274-2TD 3.6ypc Curtis Martin-82-226 0TD 2.7ypc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaborJet Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 Today.... Lamont Jordan-26- 126-1TD/4-22 Rec Curtis Martin-13-30-0Td / 3-15 YTD... Lamont Jordan-75-274-2TD 3.6ypc Curtis Martin-82-226 0TD 2.7ypc Lamont Jordan is gone, Smizz. Hindsight is 20/20, right? We can always use our #2 pick next year on a solid RB. ...right after we trade our #1 to get Rivers out of San Diego. :wink: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tennessee_Jet Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 zzzzzzz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 It's not about Curtis vs. Lamont anymore. It's about, why hasn't ANYONE been given a shot here since Curtis and Herm arrived? Why haven't we addressed the position adequately? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 Translation: THEY BOTH SUCK! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bugg Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 Martin has never been a good short yardage hback. NEVER. Houston dressed, but I didn't see him get any carries. Getting a bowling ball of a RB like him was perect for the goalline. And yet I don't think he saw the field all day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt39 Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 Would anyone be against Blaylock starting next Sunday? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smizzy Posted October 3, 2005 Author Share Posted October 3, 2005 Would anyone be against Blaylock starting next Sunday? Barry Sanders and Walter Payton could split carries next week and they would stink up the field behind our OLD and undersized O-line. It's gonna be a long yr. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.02d5a086ca7ed80fc66faf3bb6f878c7.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.