dogzilla Posted May 7, 2010 Share Posted May 7, 2010 three wr's. fitzgerald, marshall, holmes rb. adrian petterson I'd go with; QB: Manning RB: Chris Johnson WR: Fitz, A. Johnson, S. Smith(Car) TE: Gates I think they'd score some points Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Revis Posted May 7, 2010 Share Posted May 7, 2010 I'd go with; QB: Manning RB: Chris Johnson WR: Fitz, A. Johnson, S. Smith(Car) TE: Gates I think they'd score some points Dam I do see chris johnson doin sum damage...hes jus too fast...speed kills....but as for the passing attack i think the secondary would hve them locked down for the gme with the pressure tht ware would apply being that he would literally go unblocked on alot of plays because of the fact tht all three d linemen attracts double teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted May 7, 2010 Author Share Posted May 7, 2010 imo, i think that the defense would be able to stop them. Id put my money on this defense over any offense u can name. Any other qb besides Brees and Manning would absolutely fail agaisnt this defense. If it is Manning or Brees throwing it, it still would be a very difficult accomplishment. QB: Rivers RB: CJ WR: AJ, CJ, Welker I think that'd do a fair amount of damage to most D's. Unless that D was Rexgressive...in that case, we're *****ed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dogzilla Posted May 7, 2010 Share Posted May 7, 2010 Dam I do see chris johnson doin sum damage...hes jus too fast...speed kills....but as for the passing attack i think the secondary would hve them locked down for the gme with the pressure tht ware would apply being that he would literally go unblocked on alot of plays because of the fact tht all three d linemen attracts double teams. very true but Manning is almost unsackable, if anyone could find a weakness in that D it would be him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.