Josh Freeman
#2
Posted 27 December 2010 - 12:06 PM
He plays in a better climate, but i have to admit, I didn't want Freeman at all and he looks really good for a second year kid. (Sanchez was my favorite of the three)Should have stayed put and drafted him.
Freeman >>>>> Sanchez

Yeah, I'm totally gay
So ****ing this dude. Unreal.
#4
Posted 27 December 2010 - 12:11 PM
He plays in a better climate, but i have to admit, I didn't want Freeman at all and he looks really good for a second year kid. (Sanchez was my favorite of the three)
Sanchez was my least favorite. Stafford was my favorite. Freeman is the best of the bunch. Jets would be SB bound with him.
Still can probably trade for Tebow when new HC comes in.
#5
Posted 27 December 2010 - 12:13 PM
#7
Posted 27 December 2010 - 12:25 PM
We sick an' tired of-a your ism-skism game. Dyin' 'n' goin' to heaven in-a Jesus' name, Lord. We know when we understand:<br />
Almighty God is a living man. - Bob Marley "Get up Stand up"
#8
Posted 27 December 2010 - 12:26 PM
Because he threw 5 TDs against the Seahawks?
**** Josh Freeman fanbois.
He'd NEVER survive in the NY media market.
GRASS IS ALWAYS GREENER FOR JETS FANS.
Much better player than Sanchez. TB has a shot at the playoffs in the toughtesr division in Football and everyone had them dead last. He's thrown 10 TD's over the last 4 games down the stretch, Sanchez has 1.
And what about him says he can't handle the pressure of NY? Cuz he doesn't have the we lost but it's ok presser down like Sanchez?
#9
Posted 27 December 2010 - 12:29 PM
Much better player than Sanchez. TB has a shot at the playoffs in the toughtesr division in Football and everyone had them dead last. He's thrown 10 TD's over the last 4 games down the stretch, Sanchez has 1.
And what about him says he can't handle the pressure of NY? Cuz he doesn't have the we lost but it's ok presser down like Sanchez?
You honestly think the NFCS is the toughest division in football?
You really believe that?
Because Josh Freeman would have NO CLUE how to handle a big media market.
That's why.
#10
Posted 27 December 2010 - 12:31 PM
Newsflash: If Rex's defense played half as good as last week against Pittsburgh, we win yesterday.
Then what-say about Josh Freeman?
Nothing.
******* NOTHING.
Not to mention, Sanchez has proved he can play through pain in dog sh*t weather.
Call me when Josh Freeman faces some god damn adversity and fights through it.
******* Josh Freeeman.
Unreal.
#11
Posted 27 December 2010 - 12:32 PM
You honestly think the NFCS is the toughest division in football?
You really believe that?
Because Josh Freeman would have NO CLUE how to handle a big media market.
That's why.
Yes. They are the best. 3 10 win teams. Defending SB champ. Team with best record in the NFL. 2 of the best qbs in the game and one the best young and up comers. Possibly sending 3 teams to the playoffs. Yes NFCS is the best.
And I don't know what you've seen in Freeman that tells u he can't handle the pressure. Seems very smart and even keeled to me.
#12
Posted 27 December 2010 - 12:35 PM
Yes. They are the best. 3 10 win teams. Defending SB champ. Team with best record in the NFL. 2 of the best qbs in the game and one the best young and up comers. Possibly sending 3 teams to the playoffs. Yes NFCS is the best.
And I don't know what you've seen in Freeman that tells u he can't handle the pressure. Seems very smart and even keeled to me.
And you don't think this has anything to do with FOUR games against NFC Worst opponents?
Come on, get out of here with this Josh Freeman bullsh*t.
#13
Posted 27 December 2010 - 12:37 PM
Let's all blow Tampa's QB after the NYJ'S quarterback went toe-to-toe with NFCN champion in a shootout.
Newsflash: If Rex's defense played half as good as last week against Pittsburgh, we win yesterday.
Then what-say about Josh Freeman?
Nothing.
******* NOTHING.
Not to mention, Sanchez has proved he can play through pain in dog sh*t weather.
Call me when Josh Freeman faces some god damn adversity and fights through it.
******* Josh Freeeman.
Unreal.
You mean the D that gave up 400 yards against the Steelers? That d?
Sanchez sucks. 1 Td in 4 games is not impressive.
#15
Posted 27 December 2010 - 12:39 PM
You mean the D that gave up 400 yards against the Steelers? That d?
Sanchez sucks. 1 Td in 4 games is not impressive.
You really think Sanchez was the reason we lost to the Bears?
Sanchez sucked against the Fins and Pats, but he's far from our biggest concern heading toward the playoffs. Can Josh Freeman play safety and blitz the QB, too?
Playing with an injured shoulder, Sanchez was one of the FEW to show up yesterday.
And I think he played JUST FINE against Pittsburgh.
Josh-*******-Freeman couldn't even FINISH Tampa Bay's game against Pittsburgh.
Edited by DireJet38, 27 December 2010 - 12:40 PM.
#16
Posted 27 December 2010 - 12:41 PM
Also of note: Josh Freeman hasn't beat a team with a winning record ALL YEAR.
NOT ONCE.
Losing 3 of 4 games down the stretch with 1 td pass to show for it is not impressive.
Put Freeman on this team and the guy is taking us to the SB. He's throwing to a rookie not Holmes, Edwards, Keller, Cotch, Lt playing with this ol. Please. Freeman is a stud.
#18
Posted 27 December 2010 - 12:51 PM
You mean the D that gave up 400 yards against the Steelers? That d?
Sanchez sucks. 1 Td in 4 games is not impressive.
Keller sucks.
Santonio sucks.
Both dropped SURE TD passes.
But keep hammering that black and white statistic.
There's plenty of gray laughing back in your face.
#19
Posted 27 December 2010 - 01:03 PM
You mean the D that gave up 400 yards against the Steelers? That d?
Sanchez sucks. 1 Td in 4 games is not impressive.
Misleading stat
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












