JohnnyLV

Yes, but if we are going to go all in then part of me says just REALLY be all in.

This is 100% true and why I am so opposed to OT at 10. The bust potential and opportunity cost is GIGANTIC

It is not anymore. College football has completely changed over the last decade. WR has actually become one of the easier picks to evaluate and OT one of the most difficult.

Problem with this data is if you did it over the last 5 years or so WR would be in green and OT would be in the yellow. The spread offense has completely changed the development and assesment of players in the draft\,

I hear they also have 9 players on their list that they have labelled "he was #1 on our board and our target all along. We are ecstatic he was on the board at 10"

Yes we need a WR. No more first round OL

Any OT at #10. I have stated before why I think they are such a bad pick for the Jets. Agree on Brian Thomas, just seems ultra risky but JD likes the high upside guys. Bowers would not make me bonkers but would make me nervous.

I am not convinced Alt is a consensus best tackle among the GMs. If Arizona trades out of 4, I could totally see us trying to get the Chargers pick.

Total must watch for me. Have seen every one since 1989 though my first was actually the 1983 draft. Was tough to watch when I was in college. I think it is exceedingly compelling though like others I miss the all day Saturday and Sunday thing

Is it though? OL picks are not really safe anymore. College is not preparing OL for the NFL. WR is now much easier to project than OT

Maybe but I hope not. OL is not a safe pick any more and it has a ton of opportunity cost. Just not a good use of resources IMO. Yes, I realize the Jets gave an OL held together with post-it notes.

It could also be a reason he shies away from taking an OT as he does not want to draft another bust either.

Interesting. I don't see JD that way. Here's how I see JD. He targets very specific players in the 1st and 2nd round including the brain dead pick and us prone to wanting to trade up. He is too willing to spend too much opportunity cost to get the player he wants. The PFF nerds were right about the AVT trade being terrible He values up side potential over a higher floor. After the first round he relies increasingly and too much on athletic measurables JD knows without a playoff run he is gone and we are rebuilding totally in 2026 no matter what happens. So I see him having no tie to the 2025 picks so I see him using those to move up. It would not shock me if we trade some combination of 2 of our Top 3 picks next year. I don't see him as a value guy at all

He made it clear he would trade up for a certain player or two. I still think a small trade up us the most likely scenario

Which is why I am convinced we are trading up to 7 or 8