Jump to content
  • Posts

    • Well the difference is there isn't this tier of omg-level OT prospects like there are for WRs. Seems - for OT/OL - there's more of a group of several where it's a matter of opinion which will be better or more valuable, that it runs through approximately the end of the first round (give or take 10 picks), and thereafter there's a steep dropoff well before our 3rd round pick. For WRs, there's that tier of the top 3, and then a 2nd tier of guys seemingly as talented but who are considered bigger bust risks, and then there's a 3rd tier that more or less spills over into round 3.  I'm not saying they should therefore take an OT at #10 -- personally I'm happy with an elite WR or an elite OT (probably leaning more towards WR because the "you can get by with" alternative is probably easier to replace at OT than WR. Just that it was my understanding - correctly or incorrectly, since grading draft classes in advance is decidedly not my thing - that this draft class is supposed to be much deeper at WR than at tackle. 
    • Last season Conklin had 27 first downs on 61 receptions with Zach & friends throwing him the football. Last year’s next Travis Kelce had 29 first downs on 73 receptions from Josh Allen. 
  • Available Subscriptions

×
×
  • Create New...